I know many of you seem to believe their is an alternative business case, or that Delta's decision will come back to haunt them where it hurts economically, but I don't see it.
What percentage of their annual cargo transport is made up of African trophies? I'd bet a really good dinner in Dallas at DSC, it is less than .01% of their total cargo business. Remember, they fly 170 million passengers a year. What percentage of those are hunters? Only around 15,000 Americans participate in African safaris of any type each year. I would be stunned if more than half flew Delta. But for the sake of argument let's say all of them hold Delta tickets. And what percentage is that of 170 mil? I would have to see the actual cube and weight, but I bet the total trophy cargo lading per year could be handled by four or five flights - likely as few as two. Remember only a portion of those 15000 American visitors are actual hunters - a meaningful proportion are family and or observers. No one builds a international transport business case out of those numbers.
It is no wonder that Delta leadership is inevitably a lot more afraid of the mob than they are concerned about us. Can't blame them.
They will eventually respond to logic - I hope. It is our best weapon and we need to use it effectively. That is why I hope there is a consolidated push by our various organizations.
That said, this morning I witnessed a local deer hunter react almost gleefully to the ban. He was genuinely pleased that "all those rich fat bastards" going to Africa were getting put in their place.