Hawk,
I completely understand. If you want a 9.3, by all means get one. If you don’t, you WILL regret it. Just like I and many others here and elsewhere, you will always think about the 9.3 or any other cartridge that was intriguing to you and what could have been? Compromise is bittersweet. It may be the logical choice, but you’ll never get that “what if” out of your thoughts.
CEH
Thank you for understanding!
Yes, the 9.3x62 has intrigued me for just a little while. But not as much as the 35 Whelen.
I know, now, with the newer powders, both of the old gals can have some pep added to their step, if you know what I mean. I'm glad they can.
I used to have a .375 H&H a long time ago, and I loved it. I can't imagine me not liking the 9.3x62. it doesn't kick as much, not that the 375 was all that bad, to me.
I imagine the 35 Whelen and the 9.3x62 aren't in the patty cake area of kick, but I'm thinking they're not as bad as my 300 Win Mag either.
With lower powder levels, and being extremely efficient when burning those powder columns, and having much heavier bullets, I would think the recoil would feel more like a shove, than a rapid mule kick to the shoulder and face.
But, I do digress.
I believe I will send off the "new" Savage 110E to JES, and have him rebore it to 9.3x62, since it will fit inside the Savage long action quite nicely.
Then, when I go elk, or moose hunting in well established Grizz territory, I won't have to worry about the darned critters a comin' and gnawing on my shin bone, instead of ending the confrontation immediately, or close to immediately.
Hawk