Based on scopes that other shooters have said worked for them, I get the feeling that I require additional eye relief to get most scopes to work for me. I definitely need a generous amount with my bad eyesight & glasses. Quite often, that has translated into some of the pricier scopes. In the past, I've had a Swarovski z5 2.4-12x50, Swarovski z6 1.7-10x42, a Schmidt & Bender 1.5-8x42 Stratos and a Schmidt & Bender 3-12x42 Klassik mounted on mine which have worked really well...at a cost.
Recently I did a scope reshuffle on all of my rifles & was able to move some older scopes to my Rugers that I like better because of their smaller size. The last scope that worked well for me was the Meopta R2 1-6x24 RD that I have on my 303 British. There was
one in the classifieds for sale here recently.
My 275 Rigby RSI has a Redfield Revolution 2-7x33 on it. My 6.5x55 SE has a Leupold 6x42 fixed. My 9.3x74r has a Minox ZA5 1.5-8x32.
Because I had so much trouble getting scopes to work for me on my various falling blocks, I got into the habit of drafting various scope models I was thinking of buying onto a cardboard template. Then I would hold them up against a mounted scope that worked great & I was able to judge how far back the rear ocular would be based on where the template contacted the rings and could make an informed decision about its potential suitability.
View attachment 693848
I have a couple of affordable
Hawke Optics scopes on my smaller 17 HMR & 22 pneumatic. Several of their scopes (1-6x24, 1-8x24, 1.5-6x44, etc.) looked promising using the above method. The
Tract 1-8x24 scopes looked like they would work as well.