Allure of the Ruger No1

I had purchased a used Leupold VX-I 1-4x20 “Shotgun/ Muzzleloader” scope for my No. 1 with the hope that I could get a clear sight picture but still cannot get a clear picture of the edges of the reticle without moving my head unnaturally forward on the stock.

Which scopes have ya’ll had the best luck with?
 
I’ve had the same issue of needing to “crawl” up the stock a bit on my No 1 to see the full image with no black ring.

Has to do with the available scope mounts keeping the scope just that much too far forward.

There are reportedly some cantilevered rear mounts out there that let the scope come back but I’ve never found them.

I run a Leupold VX6HD 1-6 and just live with it. Not really a big issue once I practiced with the rifle/scope setup.
 
Which scopes have ya’ll had the best luck with?

Based on scopes that other shooters have said worked for them, I get the feeling that I require additional eye relief to get most scopes to work for me. I definitely need a generous amount with my bad eyesight & glasses. Quite often, that has translated into some of the pricier scopes. In the past, I've had a Swarovski z5 2.4-12x50, Swarovski z6 1.7-10x42, a Schmidt & Bender 1.5-8x42 Stratos and a Schmidt & Bender 3-12x42 Klassik mounted on mine which have worked really well...at a cost.

Recently I did a scope reshuffle on all of my rifles & was able to move some older scopes to my Rugers that I like better because of their smaller size. The last scope that worked well for me was the Meopta R2 1-6x24 RD that I have on my 303 British. There was one in the classifieds for sale here recently.

My 275 Rigby RSI has a Redfield Revolution 2-7x33 on it. My 6.5x55 SE has a Leupold 6x42 fixed. My 9.3x74r has a Minox ZA5 1.5-8x32.

Because I had so much trouble getting scopes to work for me on my various falling blocks, I got into the habit of drafting various scope models I was thinking of buying onto a cardboard template. Then I would hold them up against a mounted scope that worked great & I was able to judge how far back the rear ocular would be based on where the template contacted the rings and could make an informed decision about its potential suitability.

AH_Scope_Template.jpg


I have a couple of affordable Hawke Optics scopes on my smaller 17 HMR & 22 pneumatic. Several of their scopes (1-6x24, 1-8x24, 1.5-6x44, etc.) looked promising using the above method. The Tract 1-8x24 scopes looked like they would work as well.
 
Ruger sells offset rings for the #1 that positions the scope farther to the rear so that you don't have to crawl the stock. Certainly worth a look.
 
Based on scopes that other shooters have said worked for them, I get the feeling that I require additional eye relief to get most scopes to work for me. I definitely need a generous amount with my bad eyesight & glasses. Quite often, that has translated into some of the pricier scopes. In the past, I've had a Swarovski z5 2.4-12x50, Swarovski z6 1.7-10x42, a Schmidt & Bender 1.5-8x42 Stratos and a Schmidt & Bender 3-12x42 Klassik mounted on mine which have worked really well...at a cost.

Recently I did a scope reshuffle on all of my rifles & was able to move some older scopes to my Rugers that I like better because of their smaller size. The last scope that worked well for me was the Meopta R2 1-6x24 RD that I have on my 303 British. There was one in the classifieds for sale here recently.

My 275 Rigby RSI has a Redfield Revolution 2-7x33 on it. My 6.5x55 SE has a Leupold 6x42 fixed. My 9.3x74r has a Minox ZA5 1.5-8x32.

Because I had so much trouble getting scopes to work for me on my various falling blocks, I got into the habit of drafting various scope models I was thinking of buying onto a cardboard template. Then I would hold them up against a mounted scope that worked great & I was able to judge how far back the rear ocular would be based on where the template contacted the rings and could make an informed decision about its potential suitability.

View attachment 693848

I have a couple of affordable Hawke Optics scopes on my smaller 17 HMR & 22 pneumatic. Several of their scopes (1-6x24, 1-8x24, 1.5-6x44, etc.) looked promising using the above method. The Tract 1-8x24 scopes looked like they would work as well.
Thats a brilliant idea! Thanks for detailed summary!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
61,606
Messages
1,349,788
Members
116,368
Latest member
LethaLigar
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Elite Hunting Outfitters
Salahuddin wrote on STEAR's profile.
Thank you.
ghay wrote on DobeGrant45c's profile.
Hi Ethan,
Just checking to see if you know when you will be shipping yet?
Thanks,
Gary
 
Top