Acceptable accuracy in a rifle! What’s that mean??

[mdwest]

In my experience, I haven’t seen many vintage rifles that were low accuracy. Handloads or different factory ammo often turn a 4” group dullard into a 1” group rifle. I’m happy shooting any rifle that can produce 1.5” groups at a 100 yards considering almost all my hunting is inside of 250 yards.

Similar experiences here.

I’ve owned plenty of new as well as plenty of old rifles that didn’t shoot well with factory ammo…

Once I brewed up a decent hand load, it’s a rare rifle that can’t produce a decent group (assuming there’s nothing functionally wrong with the rifle like barrel shot out, chamber pitted, etc)…

Granted, all are not tack drivers…

But getting 1.5” groups out of most rifles isn’t a huge challenge… which for most hunters shooting at typical hunting distances, is plenty good enough…

Doesn’t matter if we are talking a $250 beat up old savage axis or Ruger American… or a $3500 brand new seekins precision.. almost everything can be made to shoot well enough for hunting…

 

[rookhawk]

Similar experiences here.

I’ve owned plenty of new as well as plenty of old rifles that didn’t shoot well with factory ammo…

Once I brewed up a decent hand load, it’s a rare rifle that can’t produce a decent group (assuming there’s nothing functionally wrong with the rifle like barrel shot out, chamber pitted, etc)…

Granted, all are not tack drivers…

But getting 1.5” groups out of most rifles isn’t a huge challenge… which for most hunters shooting at typical hunting distances, is plenty good enough…

Doesn’t matter if we are talking a $250 beat up old savage axis or Ruger American… or a $3500 brand new seekins precision.. almost everything can be made to shoot well enough for hunting…

My favorite rescue is on rifles with throat erosion. Going with heavy for caliber bullets closer to the lands, or going with copper bullets that are volumetrically larger seems to turn trash into treasure.

 

[poco]

My favorite rescue is on rifles with throat erosion. Going with heavy for caliber bullets closer to the lands, or going with copper bullets that are volumetrically larger seems to turn trash into treasure.

I did that with a Lee enfield.303 had problems with 150gr ammunition and corrosive primers
Ran a bore brush dipped in Naval Jelly on an electric drill and reamed out All the rust, copper, primer junk , then mix of diesel and transmission fluid soak , then a coat amsoil gun oil , then started using 180gr Remington Cor-Lok .
And it was night and day.
Imo .303 needs 180gr + , anyway

 

[Doubleplay]

For a double rifle, if you can hit a paper plate from the sticks at 60-70 yards it's more than acceptable to me.

 

[Hogpatrol]

For a double rifle, if you can hit a paper plate from the sticks at 60-70 yards it's more than acceptable to me.

aka "minute of paper plate".

 

[MS 9x56]

aka "minute of paper plate". View attachment 644161

For me acceptable is minute of deer

 

[KTMpilot]

Here's how I go about all this...

Figure out the vital zone of what I'm after and at typical distances.

Figure out what the rifle & ammo combination consistently produces in group sizes during field practice (sticks, off-hand, etc.)

Then, whatever the verdict, I then double the expected group size to account for all the field variables I'm likely to encounter (adrenaline dump, out of breath, lousy shooting position, uncooperative animal, etc.)

I find this approach keeps me, for the most part, out of trouble dealing with poor shots, long tracking sessions, lost animals, etc.

YMMV.

Well said. One thing to add is "Figure out what the rifle & ammo combination consistently produces in group sizes during field practice (sticks, off-hand, etc.) with a cold barrell."

 

[Bob Nelson 35Whelen]

For me acceptable is minute of deer

@MS 9x56
Minute of deer is fine for deer but not good enough for rabbits. They are a lot smaller so you may miss a lot. You will need minute of bunny for that not minute of Bambi
Just saying. Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha
Bob