Acceptable accuracy in a rifle! What’s that mean??

In my experience, I haven’t seen many vintage rifles that were low accuracy. Handloads or different factory ammo often turn a 4” group dullard into a 1” group rifle. I’m happy shooting any rifle that can produce 1.5” groups at a 100 yards considering almost all my hunting is inside of 250 yards.

Similar experiences here.

I’ve owned plenty of new as well as plenty of old rifles that didn’t shoot well with factory ammo…

Once I brewed up a decent hand load, it’s a rare rifle that can’t produce a decent group (assuming there’s nothing functionally wrong with the rifle like barrel shot out, chamber pitted, etc)…

Granted, all are not tack drivers…

But getting 1.5” groups out of most rifles isn’t a huge challenge… which for most hunters shooting at typical hunting distances, is plenty good enough…

Doesn’t matter if we are talking a $250 beat up old savage axis or Ruger American… or a $3500 brand new seekins precision.. almost everything can be made to shoot well enough for hunting…
 
Similar experiences here.

I’ve owned plenty of new as well as plenty of old rifles that didn’t shoot well with factory ammo…

Once I brewed up a decent hand load, it’s a rare rifle that can’t produce a decent group (assuming there’s nothing functionally wrong with the rifle like barrel shot out, chamber pitted, etc)…

Granted, all are not tack drivers…

But getting 1.5” groups out of most rifles isn’t a huge challenge… which for most hunters shooting at typical hunting distances, is plenty good enough…

Doesn’t matter if we are talking a $250 beat up old savage axis or Ruger American… or a $3500 brand new seekins precision.. almost everything can be made to shoot well enough for hunting…

My favorite rescue is on rifles with throat erosion. Going with heavy for caliber bullets closer to the lands, or going with copper bullets that are volumetrically larger seems to turn trash into treasure.
 
My favorite rescue is on rifles with throat erosion. Going with heavy for caliber bullets closer to the lands, or going with copper bullets that are volumetrically larger seems to turn trash into treasure.
I did that with a Lee enfield.303 had problems with 150gr ammunition and corrosive primers
Ran a bore brush dipped in Naval Jelly on an electric drill and reamed out All the rust, copper, primer junk , then mix of diesel and transmission fluid soak , then a coat amsoil gun oil , then started using 180gr Remington Cor-Lok .
And it was night and day.
Imo .303 needs 180gr + , anyway
 
For a double rifle, if you can hit a paper plate from the sticks at 60-70 yards it's more than acceptable to me.
 
For a double rifle, if you can hit a paper plate from the sticks at 60-70 yards it's more than acceptable to me.
aka "minute of paper plate".
e-lol.gif
 
Here's how I go about all this...

Figure out the vital zone of what I'm after and at typical distances.

Figure out what the rifle & ammo combination consistently produces in group sizes during field practice (sticks, off-hand, etc.)

Then, whatever the verdict, I then double the expected group size to account for all the field variables I'm likely to encounter (adrenaline dump, out of breath, lousy shooting position, uncooperative animal, etc.)

I find this approach keeps me, for the most part, out of trouble dealing with poor shots, long tracking sessions, lost animals, etc.

YMMV.
Well said. One thing to add is "Figure out what the rifle & ammo combination consistently produces in group sizes during field practice (sticks, off-hand, etc.) with a cold barrell."
 
For me acceptable is minute of deer :giggle:
@MS 9x56
Minute of deer is fine for deer but not good enough for rabbits. They are a lot smaller so you may miss a lot. You will need minute of bunny for that not minute of Bambi
Just saying. Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha
Bob
 
Accuracy, to me when hunting, is hitting what I’m aiming at, roughly where I’m aiming, and what I hit dropping on the spot. I do a lot of culling and as long as the animal drops dead I am happy.
Target shooting is a different kettle of fish( I do wonder why they put fish in a kettle)
Gumpy
 
@MS 9x56
Minute of deer is fine for deer but not good enough for rabbits. They are a lot smaller so you may miss a lot. You will need minute of bunny for that not minute of Bambi
Just saying. Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha
Bob

That’s why rabbits are hunted with shotguns…

:D
 
Accuracy, to me when hunting, is hitting what I’m aiming at, roughly where I’m aiming, and what I hit dropping on the spot. I do a lot of culling and as long as the animal drops dead I am happy.
Target shooting is a different kettle of fish( I do wonder why they put fish in a kettle)
Gumpy

Wonder no more.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7409.jpeg
    IMG_7409.jpeg
    12 KB · Views: 12

Forum statistics

Threads
57,878
Messages
1,242,130
Members
102,228
Latest member
forloh
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Grz63 wrote on Werty's profile.
(cont'd)
Rockies museum,
CM Russel museum and lewis and Clark interpretative center
Horseback riding in Summer star ranch
Charlo bison range and Garnet ghost town
Flathead lake, road to the sun and hiking in Glacier NP
and back to SLC (via Ogden and Logan)
Grz63 wrote on Werty's profile.
Good Morning,
I plan to visit MT next Sept.
May I ask you to give me your comments; do I forget something ? are my choices worthy ? Thank you in advance
Philippe (France)

Start in Billings, Then visit little big horn battlefield,
MT grizzly encounter,
a hot springs (do you have good spots ?)
Looking to buy a 375 H&H or .416 Rem Mag if anyone has anything they want to let go of
Erling Søvik wrote on dankykang's profile.
Nice Z, 1975 ?
Tintin wrote on JNevada's profile.
Hi Jay,

Hope you're well.

I'm headed your way in January.

Attending SHOT Show has been a long time bucket list item for me.

Finally made it happen and I'm headed to Vegas.

I know you're some distance from Vegas - but would be keen to catch up if it works out.

Have a good one.

Mark
 
Top