9.3x62 - Large or Large Magnum Primers?

Fenstar

AH senior member
Joined
Jun 11, 2023
Messages
74
Reaction score
135
Location
Arizona/Idaho/Texas
Hunted
Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, South Africa
I’ve been a handloader for a long time- but I tend to be old school and big bore. Primers types were always easy to determine. The 9.3x62 has had my attention for a long time… just now, it has my focused attention. From what I gather, 286g bullets work best with RL-17 and Big Game powder. 250g bullets work best with RL-15 and Varget. I know with testing I could probably deduct which primer to use- but w primers in short supply, I figured I would ask the professionals for basic rules of thumb, plus past experience proof. Thank you in advance. Fenstar
 
Anything with around 70 and more grains of powder my rule of thumb is magnum primers
 
I don't reload the cartridge 9,3x62, but the cartridge 9,3x64. For latter I mostly use Large Rifle Magnum primers, although it is not always recommended, not even in the reloading manual from RWS for example. For the cartridge 9,3x62 I would use Large Rifle primers, as recommended in most European reloading manuals.
 
I use both and haven’t seen any difference between the two. And don’t negate Alliant power pro 2000 Mr. Some really great powder for the 9,3
 
I would use magnums for the ball powder (big game) and standards for the two stick types. Most manuals suggest the use of magnums and other ball powders, so I do.
I would hate to tell you how many pounds of WW 760 I have set off with a standard primer in the past however.
 
I use LRM for everything, including 6.5x55. That one uses a slow powder, though for the rather heavy-for-calibre 156g bullets.

I think Norma's reloading data is all based on LRM as well.
 
I have developed some good 285 gr. bullet loads for my 9.3x62 with both RL 15 powder, and Ramshot BG.
I use Std primers in the 58 gr. / RL15 loads and Mag primers in the 65 gr. / Ramshot BG loads. For no more scientific reason than I decided long ago to use magnum primers when powder charges exceeded 60 grains or when using ball powders, and the RSBG load meets both criteria.
 
I’ve been a handloader for a long time- but I tend to be old school and big bore. Primers types were always easy to determine. The 9.3x62 has had my attention for a long time… just now, it has my focused attention. From what I gather, 286g bullets work best with RL-17 and Big Game powder. 250g bullets work best with RL-15 and Varget. I know with testing I could probably deduct which primer to use- but w primers in short supply, I figured I would ask the professionals for basic rules of thumb, plus past experience proof. Thank you in advance. Fenstar
With 62.5 gr of 2000MR and CCI LR, I'm getting about 2475 fps with 286 gr A Frames, COAL at 3.32. And even at that length, I still have about a 0.06 jump.

3.291 is the official max coal for 9.3x62. I own 2 - a Zastava Mauser and a Sauer 100. I get to 3.38 max coal for them both - measured both with Hornady's tool and the old school way with a wooden dowel.

Use LRM if it suits you, I don't believe it's necessary for this work horse.

Measure your seating depth. I can almost guarantee you can go longer than what any of the reloading manuals say, by quite a bit.

Hornady's data for their 286 gr is absurd - 3.125. That isn't a type-o: 3.125. Same length in manuals IX, X, and XI
 
@sgt_zim what brass are you using and what load density are you getting with that load?
Norma, I'm away from my PC and GRT load data until next week.

There is still a bit of room with the A Frames at 3.32, but the 258 gr Hammers at 3.3" are pretty close to needing a roll/taper crimp with the seater.

Ball powders like 2000MR and Big Game seem to work better in a full case
 
@sgt_zim what brass are you using and what load density are you getting with that load?
After I handed Charlie my GRT data, to get the predicted in line with observed, he calculated a 0.2" jump, which shows 97.3% at 62.5 gr or 2000MR - calculated is about 20 fps slower ( 2455 fps) than observed (2475 fps) at that data point. Pressure is calculated at 55244 psi.
 
I use both for hunting and haven't noticed any difference!
 
I used to use LR primers for mine and my sons 9.3x62. But when the current round of shortages hit a few years back, I had way more magnum primers on hand, so have been using them for the last few years. I cant see much difference. Certainly not a problem using mag primers, but would work the load up again just to be safe.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
56,530
Messages
1,207,001
Members
98,794
Latest member
Kdbull
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Longfeather1 wrote on Cmwkwarrwn's profile.
Hello Clark
Thanks for the interest in my rifle. If you want to discuss it further you can email me direct at [redacted] or call my cell number [redacted].
Look forward to talking with you.
Regards,
Jack Kramer
quacker attacker wrote on JMV375's profile.
Hello, My wife and I hunted with Marius 2 years ago. He fit us into his schedule after a different outfitter "bailed" on us. He was always very good with communications and although we didn't end up meeting him personally, he called us multiple times during our hunt to make sure things were going well. We were very happy with him.
TERMINATOR wrote on Cuthberto's profile.
Reach out to the guys at Epic Outdoors.

They will steer you right for landowner tags and outfitters that have them.

I have held a membership with them for years and they are an invaluable resource.

Way better that asking random people on the internet...WAY better

Raskolnikov743 wrote on skydiver386's profile.
Skydiver386,

Did you ever find your 30-06 CZ550? I own a fairly solid conditioned one, if you wanted to talk.

[redacted]
 
Top