bruce moulds
AH legend
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2018
- Messages
- 2,871
- Reaction score
- 4,832
i cannot accept the figures of case capacity where the whelen is given greater capacity.
the shoulder of the 9.3 is noticeably further forward.
the only way those figures could be right is if the 9.3 has thicker brass by a long shot.
the comparison of 280 vs 7x64 might not be as valid as the 280 vs 270 in this discussion.
the differences in diameter are similar to whelen vs 9.3mm.
the 280 holds a bit more powder, and shoots bullets of similar s.d. at about the same speed, and bullets of the same wt faster when loaded to similar pressure.
with similar s.d. bullets, the 280 is noticeably a better killer than the 270.
the 280 is better top end as it has heavier bullets.
same for the 9.3x62 vs the whelen.
probably a good way to look at this debate is that the whelen approaches the 9.3x62 more closely than some might think.
bruce.
the shoulder of the 9.3 is noticeably further forward.
the only way those figures could be right is if the 9.3 has thicker brass by a long shot.
the comparison of 280 vs 7x64 might not be as valid as the 280 vs 270 in this discussion.
the differences in diameter are similar to whelen vs 9.3mm.
the 280 holds a bit more powder, and shoots bullets of similar s.d. at about the same speed, and bullets of the same wt faster when loaded to similar pressure.
with similar s.d. bullets, the 280 is noticeably a better killer than the 270.
the 280 is better top end as it has heavier bullets.
same for the 9.3x62 vs the whelen.
probably a good way to look at this debate is that the whelen approaches the 9.3x62 more closely than some might think.
bruce.