Bob Nelson 35Whelen
AH ambassador
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2018
- Messages
- 11,107
- Reaction score
- 27,432
- Location
- Wyong new south Wales Australia
- Media
- 130
- Member of
- SSAA
- Hunted
- Australia
@Brent JamesOnly hassle I run I to was with s&b brass. Whilst supposedly made to c.i.p standards, this is not the (case). The head height is considerably less than the U.S brass, did run Into head spacing troubles until I adjusted reloading dies accordingly.Have since dumped all of them, as I have mainly Remington & federal brass.I ran into this problem many years ago with ici/imi 243 brass, the case head height being far less than the U.S counterparts. This problem still exists to this day In continental made 22 hornet cases as compared to U. S made. Not only is the head height less , but the case rim height is greater. This gives all sorts of head spacing / case separation issues.
With the ruger #1 in 303 British, there are no problems with case stretching /separations, ( unless using s&b brass ).
Whilst I won't list loading data here, it's very easy to achieve velocities in excess of 200 fps over 308 factory ammunition with 180 grain projectiles, in the ruger #1.
However , my usual load is very mild, in keeping with the original loads @ 2450fps.
The 303 British headspace on the rim not the datum line on the shoulder. You could set your FLS die to set the shoulder halfway down the case and it will not affect the headspace.
Rim thickness plays a big part as a rim of 0.60 thou will cause issues.
The ideal rim thickness is 0.62 to 0.64 thou and will minimize headspace. Remington and Hornaday are good cases in this regard.
As for the 303 case being weak I very much doubt it nowdays as I load my 25/303 Epps Newton improved to 52,000 cup in my p14 and have NEVER had an issue with cases.
Bob