Saul
AH elite
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2014
- Messages
- 1,658
- Reaction score
- 3,306
- Location
- Key Largo, Florida
- Hunted
- USA, UK, Hungary, Argentina, Mexico
I thought it would be better to create a new thread instead of derailing the Tiny 10 thread. For those of you with an AR-type rifle, why did you choose the one you did? I am in the market for one and @Red Leg has me considering Daniel Defense...
I am in the market for an AR for defense, range, and just in case there is a ban.What's the purpose?
Saying you're in the market for an AR is only slightly less vague than saying you want opinions on which hunting rifle to buy?
I am in the market for an AR for defense, range, and just in case there is a ban.
I am intrigued by the Rock River Arnms LAR-15.
Rock River makes a good middle of the road rifle.. they arent a bad choice at all (IMO).. affordable and reliable..
youre not going to get the same fit and finish from a RRA as you will with a Daniel Defense.. but you will get a reliable rifle that will shoot where you point it.. and do it every time you pull the trigger..
For defense I'd think about looking at 300 BLK.. its not quite a cheap to shoot as 5.56.. but its not expensive by any means.. all of the components to include 556 magazines work with 300 BLK.. the only difference is the barrel (so if you end up not liking it, its just a $75-$200 barrel swap depending on what sort of barrel you want).. and you now have a 556 gun..
Ammo is easy to come by.. and if you reload, the parent case is the 5.56 NATO case (so millions upon millions of cases out there.. you just have to run them through a 300 BLK die and youre good to go..).. and the projectile is a .30 projectile (so also easy to come by.. tons available)..
Ballistically, for shooting at home defense (or even inner city, house to house and block to block type stuff) it delivers significantly superior down range ballistics.. with almost negligibly more recoil... and the same mag capacity as 556..
If youre wanting to take a 400 yard shot.. 300 BLK isnt the better choice..
but for 150 yards and closer, it blows the 5.56 completely out of the water IMO..
Totally agree on where investment matters. Before taking it home, we replaced the trigger on the DDm4 with the match grade version on my .308 and other 5.56. The DDm4 is primarily a ranch defence weapon - one that could be used inside or out. For that, I find the 5.56 hard to beat. It is equipped with a red dot.I like accuracy. Mine are custom rigs, match triggers, very good barrels (two have black hole polygonally rifles barrels). To give you an idea, my 6.5 Grendel shoots sub 2”, 5 shot groups at 300, I have a 5.56 that shoots about the same and a DPMS in 7.62 that shoots moa out to 600. The uppers and lowers are a mixed bunch, I don’t know how much that matters, they all seem about the same. The barrels, triggers and optics are where I put my money.
I am in the market for an AR for defense, range, and just in case there is a ban.
I am intrigued by the Rock River Arnms LAR-15.
Mine is very accurate, and has a very usable two-stage trigger. I have it equipped with Trijicon scope and a suppressor.
Most conversions seem to be jamomatics. This rifle feeds extremely well regardless of magazine size. Also, the magazines are designed to cleanly fit the AR receiver. It doesn't look like someone jammed a .22 mag in the receiver base as an afterthought. Good little rifle.That is good to know/hear..
I've considered picking one of those up to use as a squirrel/raccoon/armadillo/whatever gun.. but didnt know how well they functioned... all of the old 22 conversion kits I messed around with in the late 90's pretty much sucked.. I was hopeful S&W worked out the bugs by designing and building a .22 from the ground up.. but I have never spoken to anyone that actually owns one to know how well or poorly it performs..
I have an old Aimpoint Comp ML sitting in the safe that combined with a reliable semi-auto .22 would make for very bad days for squirrels..