Permanent war economy and the Military industrial complex.

I would urge those with whom this resonates, to study economics - maybe just a little. It makes one less susceptible to this sort of propaganda from the left - or at least it was the left until a couple of years ago when a third of the republican party became de facto members of Code Pink - and seemingly just as blatantly ignorant.
During the World War II, the US was spending just over 40% of GDP on the military. That is a
war economy. During the Cold War, the US was spending approximately 8-10% of its GDP on the military. Today, it spends just under 3.5%. Neither of the latter represent anything remotely like a "war economy," but facts like that are irrelevant to those people more interested in what they feel and want to believe rather than reality (another set of what were until recently leftist traits).
Secondly, hauling mothballed equipment out of storage and prepping it for deployment is not the sort of thing that interests the defense industry in the slightest. On the other hand, a trillion dollar new fighter program or multi-trillion dollar missile defense shield, those are the opportunities that excite investors in the defense industry. Those are two
Trump initiatives announced over the last two days - maybe his ever trusting followers can figure out how to blame Zelensky for that?
By the way, Trump is also demanding that NATO nations spend 5% of their GDP on defense. I wonder if that will include the US?
Boeing has won a contract to develop the F-47 next-generation combat aircraft for the U.S. Air Force which throws a lifeline to the company’s struggling military aviation business.
aviationweek.com
The proposed “Iron Dome for America” system is heavily reliant on space-based sensors and potentially controversial space-based interceptors
spacenews.com