As a general rule we in the US, along with sensible people worldwide, believe in free speech. I find it hard to believe a general discussion about the topic at hand violated any site rules and therefore find it off putting that the thread was deleted. If said discussion did in fact violate site rules then why not say so? If the thread was so inflammatory why not address the matter it in a firm and direct manner and be done with it? Simply deleting the thread has a very bad look to it..
This is absolutely not a "free speech" issue.
This site is a business venture. It is a business that offers a set of beneficial products and/or rewards to the ownership and subscribers. To put it simply, the business model offers a particularly useful, even unique, information service to the membership, and through sponsorships, provides a bit of income to the owner.
In turn, that sponsorship model provides a means for other businesses (outfitters, travel agents, gunmakers, optics producers, etc) to advertise and sell their products through the site. Anyone who has booked a hunt or purchased a product through one of those sponsors has benefitted from that business model.
Jerome has also provided a classified section where members can sell the occasional rifle, scope, even old Courteney boots, without paying a listing fee or becoming a sponsor. I would argue that the sale of personal items through classified listings or thread dialogue is rather obviously different than running a sales business through the same chat service. A business, even a hobby business, is pretty obviously not a classified listing.
I have no idea what personal interaction occurred. I have enormous respect for Jerome, the risks he has taken in creating this forum, and appreciation for the service it provides. I also am a great fan of Gary's knives and would guess I am likely second to @ActionBob in quantity I have purchased. He has a business listing which I will visit periodically.
Last edited by a moderator: