Why didn't Germany or Continental Europe develop big bore cartridges like the British did?

[PerH]

But that is something different than if, for example, a company like Mauser had brought a rifle onto the German market with the caliber "10.57x73/ 10.75x73 Mauser" instead of .416 Rigby or .404 Jeffery. But never mind. The Germans were vastly superior to the British when it came to repeating rifles and their calibers. While the British were unbeaten when it came to double-barreled rifles and their calibers, even though the competition from Germany, Belgium and Italy was already pretty strong at the time. You could also say that it was something like a civil arms race and, as in war, all means were permitted - on all sides

Barella msde double rifles in .404 Jeffery , at kleast one exist and it have no history of whom, what . Maybe owner had a .404 bolt also . Pictures online of it .

 

[PerH]

I almost forgot there were German rifles made in NE cartridges also , on GHG page there was about a Herman double rifle in .600 NE that went to Ondia together with its sibling , a single shot break action rifle same chambered .

I think since the British ammo in NE cartridges was made more easier to find around the world , it was cheaper to get some and build for one of them , then to develop something new .

 

[coreydb]

Yes I'm aware of the 500 Schuler but in general when you think big bore, dangerous game cartridges it's the British (and Americans) that come to mind. Sure Germany had the popular 9.3x62 but it's not quite in the same league as the following.

375 Holland and Holland
416 Rigby
450 NE
470 NE
500 NE
577 NE
505 Gibbs etc.

Was it because the British were more heavily invested in their colonial ventures throughout Africa and India?

Am I overlooking any big European thumpers that didn't originate in the UK?

 

[coreydb]

I know the British had the largest colonial presence on the African continent and as they expanded their presence, they needed guns to protect themselves from the large game they encountered, as well as to hunt them for food.

 

[PerH]

404 Jeffery, 404 Magnum Schüler, 416 WBY Magnum

• grand veneur
• Apr 22, 2020
• 8

The Schüler cartridge made with a 416 WBY brass after removing the belt. Interesting cartridge...

Did a little search and this came up, just a experiment it was , or didn’t go longer than that .

 

[grand veneur]

No one knows whether this cartridge was actually designed or was just a project. An original rifle for it was never found and cartridges never were found either. The cartridge 404 Magnum Schüler was designed by Mr Ziegenhahn based on what he was able to find in Schüler's workshop after it was closed down by the GDR authorities.

The cartridge is only mentioned in the famous catalog page.

 

[John Telford]

But that is something different than if, for example, a company like Mauser had brought a rifle onto the German market with the caliber "10.57x73/ 10.75x73 Mauser" instead of .416 Rigby or .404 Jeffery. But never mind. The Germans were vastly superior to the British when it came to repeating rifles and their calibers. While the British were unbeaten when it came to double-barreled rifles and their calibers, even though the competition from Germany, Belgium and Italy was already pretty strong at the time. You could also say that it was something like a civil arms race and, as in war, all means were permitted - on all sides

Jeffery never built his own rifles . He simply ordered the actioned barrels from Mauser and had the likes of Leonard finish them up. Similarly he borrowed many a caliber from the trade such as the .404 (10.75x73) and the .500 Schuler which was balistically ahead of its time. He just changed the neck angle due to feeding issues and renamed it the .500 Jeff.
The Germans most likely would have developed big bores but they ran out of time and colonies!

 

[John Telford]

No one knows whether this cartridge was actually designed or was just a project. An original rifle for it was never found and cartridges never were found either. The cartridge 404 Magnum Schüler was designed by Mr Ziegenhahn based on what he was able to find in Schüler's workshop after it was closed down by the GDR authorities.

The cartridge is only mentioned in the famous catalog page.

View attachment 653670

According to Casey Lewis there was one known rifle in .404 Schuler and he had a cartridge collector friend that paid 4000 DMarks in 1987 for an original cartridge.

 

[VertigoBE]

On a slight sidetrack, but does anyone know why the .500 Schüler/Jeffery was designed with rebated rim? Is it so difficult to put a magnum bolthead on the bolt of a standard mauser action?

 

[John Wasmuth]

On a slight sidetrack, but does anyone know why the .500 Schüler/Jeffery was designed with rebated rim? Is it so difficult to put a magnum bolthead on the bolt of a standard mauser action?

The 98 Mauser bolt is a one piece affair that is milled to accept whatever cartridge head is needed up to its size limitations. There is no separate “head”. The extractor is affixed to the bolt via a collar on the bolt. So it’s just a matter of milling the bolt face to accept the cartridge you want.

 

[mark-hunter]

does anyone know why the .500 Schüler/Jeffery was designed with rebated rim?

To fit standard mauser 98 action and bolt head. That would be my educated guess.
This is common reason for rebated rim cartridges.

 

[VertigoBE]

To fit standard mauser 98 action and bolt head. That would be my educated guess.
This is common reason for rebated rim cartridges.

So if on a standard action, the bolt head cannot be enlarged, this must be because the bolt itself on a standard action is smaller in diameter than on a magnum action? Meaning a magnum action is not only longer, it is also "larger"?

I've read about gunsmiths who would cut up two standard actions and solder them back together, in order to create a magnum action. This should not be possible if my first paragraph is correct.

 

[mark-hunter]

That sounds about right.
But for such rebated rim cartridge large casing, take a look at contemporary rifle capacity?
Probably two in magazine. The fat cartridge reduces magazine capacity.

Proper rifle magazine designed for double stacking, must be designed to stack cartridges in two stacks, in angle of 60 degrees on of top the next.
If this is not done, then space and capcity will be lost.

M98 action is the best action of all contemporary rifles of the era to make such gunsmithing like you mentioned (cutting the actions, etc). No other action was friendly for such work: like lee enfield or mosin nagan. As a result all others disappeared from sporting rifles history, except as occasional sporterized model here and there with same caliber, or re-barreled to caliber of same cartridge family.
M98 design, allowed many more further sporting developments including magnum size action

Speaking of action and sizes and magazine capacity:
In modern rifles:
My ZKK 602, 375 HH on magnum length action holds 6 rounds in magazine. (that is a jewel of factory rifles and design)
Rilfes Win m70 and zastava hold 3 rounds.

It gets even worse with some rifles: Bergara B14 in 375 H&H holds only two in magazine.
But for Bergara it is good at least that they have tried and managed to chamber this DG cartridge. 99% of other factories do not even bother with it. They in most cases stop with calibers at 300 win mag, and 9.3x62 because those fit perfectly in medium length action.
This leads to disappearance of some other calibers from market, such as 8x68, and others of 68 mm casing class.