Hah!
Holy cow, I forgot having one of those a long time ago! Forgettable I guess is the word that comes to mind now. It would hit a paper plate at 50 yards, some of the time. Ironically, those were and are one of the most popular 22s ever produced in the US. Even today there seems to be a wide division between the two camps of opinion about the 10-22- put diplomatically. I borrowed one to shoot a metal sillywet, field course competition one time. It shot OK with decent ammo. But nothing to write home about. The one I owned for a short time was not accurate at all no matter the type of ammo.
The rage (and joke) a few years ago was to buy a 10-22 for $250 then spend another $500 to $1000 on it so it would shoot with decent accuracy. A friend did one up that way then bragged that the only original Ruger parts on it were a couple of screws. I've owned a couple of Win 52s over the years and used one to shoot competition a really long time ago. I still have one, a 52B Sporter. The difference between an inherently accurate 22 like the Win 52 and the average 10-22 is eye opening for those who have never seriously compared. I know, I know the 10-22 was/is simply a mini rattle battle toy mostly for younger shooters- but good grief, they should at least shoot with some degree of consistency and accuracy for introducing young shooters to the shooting sports.