I can hear it now, "But nobody warned us". Other than that, Darwin got it right.
When in close proximity, wild animals can fix it.
Disney gave them names, personalities, and portrayed them as compassionate and caring; Steiff made them soft and "cuddley". As a child, who didn't want to sit atop the lion on the merry-go-round?
Our society is infected with people who boast of their political correctness, and put "virtue signaling" at the forefront of their every day lives. They become enraged if referred to by an improper pronoun, believe men can have babies, and buy their children litter boxes if they identify as cats. For them, the sex of a child is not determined at birth by standard equipment, they are "going to let the child decide".
Shop classes have been replaced with diversity training and Drag Queen Story Hour.
The concept of responsibility for one's actions with the realization of consequences has been replaced by entitlement, and the utterance of "I'm offended" grants immediate absolution.
Their thoughts of a particular concept or situation go no farther than to feel good about themselves.
Human/animal interaction such as this almost always end in the same manner - dead human. The event is labeled "tragic", and the dead human is now the "victim".
As evidenced by some of the comments posted on this forum, mine included, our reactions are predictable and along similar lines: Well - no sh*t, What was she thinking?, F around and find out, all saying what we know to be true. These are wild animals, they behave instinctively, and people - listen closely here: They did NOT watch "The Lion King", they did NOT have cuddley little human toys to share their bed, they couldn't care less about a selfie, and if you're not something to mate or eat - you're a threat which must be killed or avoided.
The tragedy of this event lies in the misinterpretation of the actual victim, it isn't the woman - it's the elephants. It will be interesting to see how this develops, will it be as simple as - "She shouldn't have done what she did", or will the response reflect a more sensitive nature catering to indignant cries of, "She just wanted the experience of being among them".
This complete misunderstanding of what goes on in the real world is what we as hunters continually face.
How can we possibly think to reason with these people and convince them of the benefits of hunting?