The Plunge Toward PC (Politically Correct)

In, fact, the way I see: It has a bit of everything.

How ever it is specific in one thing:

We are all here united by the passion for hunting, but in order to have real public debate, as real public social media, we miss one ingredient and that is the anti hunters.

Not that I miss them.


There are 419 members and 4065 guests online right now as I write this post.
This is a very public site.

..... It seemed like everything I googled would have some post from this site. .......

We don't tolerate trolls on this forum. If someones wants to enter into a rational debate, that is fine.

@Royal27 reminds me every so often, when he finds material from AH misused on other "public" sites, that we have very regular anti-hunting visitors here on AH.

All of you are free to start your own "I love hunting" FB page. :D
 
Last edited:
We are apparently very lovable, even though the antis won't admit it :cool:
 
We had better start talking, because the other folks are not going to stop yapping.
Sadly, their minority of bullies grabs attention through lies and manipulation and we hunters have to be ready with real hard facts.

Lies like this?

http://www.calgarysun.com/2017/02/14/group-wants-trophy-hunting-banned-in-alberta

Moderator: I don't really want to provide a link to facilitate them.
Please look it up yourselves.

http://www.bantrophyhuntingltd.com/
bantrophy hunting L t d dot com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@BRICKBURN , like I said, a lot of food for thought, I will slowly work at them.

First, SCI, I feel they really need to be smacked on the knuckles for the way they reacted. They just threw Palmer under the bus, they reacted to social media and didn't take time to get to the truth. SCI should have been there fighting for Palmer, and the rest of the hunting world.

I voiced my concern of this last year with an SCI employee last year. While they had a superficially thoughtful, plausible defense to their lack of defense of Palmer, I have purged it from from memory. It was a political answer.

I am on the board of the local SCI chapter. There are several things I think SCI should change, or at least de-empathize if I was President for the day. Making the changes would deny the enemy some of their ammo against us, and present a more conservation based theme to the non-hunters.

Actually, SCI has made some changes since Cecil. They are just very subtle. SCI should be very public about them though.

What the Calgary Chapter is doing:

http://www.sci-calgary.org/eye-on-the-antis

https://unitedhuntersfund.com/
 
I was cruising Field Sports Britain

and they mentioned a Canadian "news" program. (I use this term so loosely)
The bias of the interviewer and his ignorance of Africa is blatant.


Sadly, the hunter Jacine Jadresko (instagram @inkedhuntress) being interviewed has fallen into the trap of the regurgitated fabrications about "the Zimbabwe encounter" (ZE) being illegal.

The program interviewer regurgitates verbatim, falsehoods of the "Zimbabwe Encounter" (ZE) as though they are facts. Then uses footage of the lunatic fringe (8 anti-hunters with placards), to support the "wave" against trophy hunting.
The interviewer trying to flog "killing" versus "harvesting".
Jacine does not back down at the onslaught!

She is certainly "in your face" with her style, but stands up well on the Elephant hunting near the end. "What's the difference between that and a deer?" (y)
No response from the interviewer.

Her honesty is her best weapon. An unashamed hunter.
 
Last edited:
Louise Gray, author of 'The Ethical Carnivore' gets her first taste of wildfowling with the help of BASC and the Fenland Wildfowlers Association.


 
That news program was a piece of S! That last closing piece about elephants and lions was a sneaky dishonest way to avoid asking Ms Jadresko about that "endangered" idea. Or, maybe they did and her response did not fit their narrative?o_O. Good for her for standing tall!
 
That news program was a piece of S! That last closing piece about elephants and lions was a sneaky dishonest way to avoid asking Ms Jadresko about that "endangered" idea. Or, maybe they did and her response did not fit their narrative?o_O. Good for her for standing tall!

Using the audio tape of the kid talking about Tiger's was pretty underhanded.
 
I have long held the belief about Trophy Photos needing to be respectful. To over simplify: the limited blood, and a “no drama” version of trophy pictures. No poses with someone sitting on top of the animal, standing on it, etc.

Some of the video shot while hunting and then posted to the Web can be the worst. Often there is no thought whatsoever as to what is being shared, who will consume the story and, indeed, what “story” will be made of it.

The world has many different tastes and plenty of different cultures that will view the various materials from their own perspective. Suffice to say, disrespectful offerings are universally abhorred by the majority, both hunters and non-hunters.


It does not matter the country of origin; every Outfitter has a business to run and must be able to attract customers to obtain their business and then keep it. All form of media platforms have been used in this day and age: Hunting Shows, Hunting Conventions, Meet & Greets, Home pages on websites, newsletters, FB, Instagram, Twitter and of course the Forum where you get to interact in a timely fashion with a huge range of people in the community from around the world. Some of these methods take more skill and resources than others.


There was a Thunderclap in July 2015 in the World Media (they love to say it’s the world, it’s not really) when someone purported an illegal hunt of a Lion in Zimbabwe.

The words and phrases: Zimbabwe’s most Famous, Killer, Poached, Illegal, Endangered, Brutal killing, Outrage, Tragic, Cruelty, Cowardice, Lured, Beloved, Revenge, etc.


The illustrious (then leader) of the USFWS proceeded to head to the media and do exactly opposite of what his agency claims to be doing; “Following the facts”. How is a legal hunt tragic? The only tragedy was his abuse of power and authority.


“Ashe, in a post on Twitter, called the killing of Cecil the lion 'tragic' and said his agency will 'go where facts lead' in its investigation of the lion's death.”



Then SCI threw the hunter, an SCI member, under the bus very quickly without benefit of a hearing.

“Safari Club International is suspending the membership of the Minnesota hunter accused of illegally killing a protected lion in Zimbabwe and wants a "full and thorough investigation" into the lion's death.”

The hunter was NEVER charged, never mind convicted, of a wildlife crime in the case.

Then the public relations campaigns started: Announcements about banning the transport of “trophies” by major airlines. Although, the clear majority had never transported them in the first place. One more mob joined to feed the frenzy.

The Calgary Zoo, which was renting a facility to a local SCI fundraiser, was attacked under the guise of this big bad hunter’s association with the group.
“The Calgary Zoo does not have a relationship with Safari Club International. We are renting space in one of our venues to the Calgary Chapter of Safari Club International for their yearly fundraiser. As a public facility, we are open to all walks of life, industries, religions, and cultures; we do not discriminate against who can rent or attend events at our facilities.”

Nugent said: “The whole story is a lie. It was a wild lion from a ‘park’ where hunting is legal & ESSENTIAL beyond the park borders. All animals reproduce every year & would run out of room/food to live w/o hunting. I will write a full piece on this joke asap. God are people stupid.”

Zimbabwe will not charge American dentist Walter Palmer for killing a prized lion in July because he had obtained legal authority to conduct the hunt, a cabinet minister has said.

“We approached the police and then the prosecutor general, and it turned out that Palmer came to Zimbabwe because all the papers were in order,” the environment minister, Oppah Muchinguri-Kashiri, told reporters, adding that the American could not be charged.


https://www.theguardian.com/environ...will-not-charge-us-dentist-killing-cecil-lion

“The intensity of the backlash over the trophy killing has triggered a counter-backlash. Why, some are now asking, do people care so much about the death of a lion when so many human beings are suffering and dying? The surge of sorrow for a dead lion, they say, when compared to the relative quiet about other wrongs, reveals a moral flaw in our humanity, a defect in our moral compass.”

http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/31/opinions/ghitis-cecil-outrage/


“The Digital World leading to mobs to judge and shame.”

It was time to go after women.
Even though Zuckerberg hunts: “Teenage cheerleader turned hunter has trophy pictures removed by Facebook”

Some of the victims of the witch hunt, in fact Bullying:
Jones
Francis
Argys
Koeshall


“Bullying – use superior strength or influence to intimidate, typically to force them to do what one wants.”

In North America, there is great concern about children being Bullied. It appears that it is not just children who are the focus of this behavior. Any minority, that can be readily identified and whom some find to be disagreeable, can find themselves as the focus of this intimidation.

What is Bullying?
Many children have a good idea of what bullying is because they see it every day! Bullying happens when someone hurts or scares another person on purpose and the person being bullied has a hard time defending themselves. So, everyone needs to get involved to help stop it.
Bullying is wrong! It is behavior that makes the person being bullied feel afraid or uncomfortable. Some of these include:
Spreading bad rumors about people
Getting certain people to "gang up" on others

The most common types of bullying are:
Social Bullying - mobbing, scapegoating, excluding others from a group, humiliating others with public gestures or graffiti intended to put others down.
Cyber Bullying - using the internet or text messaging to intimidate, put-down, spread rumors or make fun of someone.

https://www.bullyingcanada.ca/what-is-bullying

It reminds me very clearly of other abusive and illegal behavior that is of major concern.

“Does someone do this to you:
  • Embarrass you with put-downs?
  • Control what you do, who you see or talk to, or where you go?
  • Stop you from seeing your friends or family members?
  • Make all the decisions?
  • Tell you that you're bad or threaten you?
  • Prevent you from working?
  • Act like the abuse is no big deal or is your fault, or even deny doing it?
  • Destroy your property or threaten to kill you?
  • Intimidate you with guns, knives, or other weapons?
If any of these things or other types of abuse are happening, you need to seek help.”


Is no one recognizing the mob and its abuse, or addressing the problem or seeking help?

I had first gotten wind of what I call the "purification" a couple of years ago. Outfitters/ Professional hunters starting to advocate that ALL trophy pictures be removed from the industries’ websites. This was obviously a reaction to bullying that was occurring in the media.


Not to single John out, he is apparently a hell of a hunter and a gentleman, but, if you would like an example of a purified website:

View attachment 173936

The only whiff I can find that you might be able to hunt with John is a picture of John with a rifle on his shoulder and the button "Hunting in Africa". No Gallery.

This was the old website’s Home page:

View attachment 173938



This might be all well and good for those long-established outfitters that have hunted for thirty years and are soon to retire, but what of the others trying to gain recognition and indeed prove they can hunt.

Do we now have to request trophy pictures from the Outfitter?


Still, others have trophy pictures on their sites but you will notice a pattern emerging: Where did all the Lions go? Cheetah? Leopard?

This was from another long-established Outfitter. Their Homepage below and the “Gallery” went missing during the first wave of purification.



View attachment 173939

But more recently there has been a move back, by some, with the revival of their Photo Gallery. No longer a totally purified site, but the Lions are gone.


View attachment 173937




Where is the problem?

No bloody wonder Outfitters get confused with mixed messages like this.

Namibia Professional Hunting Association (NAPHA)
NAPHA Newsletter 18 March 2016
“Social Media
Given the tumultuous activities on Social Media, NAPHA requests its members to refrain from participating in online discussions, mudslinging and enhancing any debate. We furthermore ask members to refrain from posting of images with hunted trophies.
We rely on the cooperation of members in this regard.”



I encountered other Outfitters starting to move toward a "Conservation" message and considering removal of all trophy pictures from their booths at hunting conventions. Some have already done this and have landscapes or just one live animal, or a herd, in the booth backdrop.


At the African Professional Hunters Association AGM, at the SCI 2017 convention, it was being touted as the new philosophy: Remove the trophy pictures from Social Media.


I spoke with Cliff Walker, an Outfitter, PH, and a member of APHA, at the 2017 SCI convention, and asked about his web experience. Cliff has trophy pictures up in his booth at SCI and on his FB site. He told me his FB page is bombarded with "comments" (Bullying and Abuse) constantly about the Lion pictures, never the Crocodile pictures. He no longer even bothers to respond to these comments. He used to make an honest effort to engage these people and educate them. It was obviously a lost cause. The delete button is now used generously. I doubt Cliff will be dropping the trophy pictures from his media any time soon.



Africahunting.com has Outfitters operating in Zambia, Zimbabwe, Namibia, South Africa, Tanzania, Mozambique, Benin, Burkina Faso, Congo, USA, and Agents operating everywhere. I was curious to see if the purification campaign had reached the Sponsors of AH.

To determine this I decided I would review a few quickly observable factors on their websites:

Lions – Pictures present when I know they hunt lions.
Gallery- Trophy Pictures
Home Page - presence of hunting pictures
Entry- require a second link to enter the site
Faces – Faces are blurred in the trophy pictures
No trophies – No pictures


Then a couple of other points of interest as a side bar.

There were THREE Outfitter webpages that were not operational. What’s going on guys?
There was ONE that has not been kept current for 6 years! Outdated material.


Only FIVE homepages did not have trophy pictures. The rest, the clear majority, still have trophy pictures on their homepage somewhere.

There were THREE that had no Lion pictures, that I know for a fact hunt Lions. One is merely because they have just opened hunting. At the moment, they have no trophy pictures.

FIVE web pages require you to enter the site to actually see what is going on. Perhaps this is to reduce the simple searches and harassment factor. Everyone else is wide open and visible from the outset.

Only ONE web page included pictures where the hunter’s faces were blurred or altered.

Only ONE website had NO GALLERY. I mean zero trophy pictures.


It appears the purification campaign has not over-taken AH Outfitters.

On the very positive side, I noted ONE website that included the “CONSERVATION” angle on the Home Page. Their link not mine.
Community Development, Anti-Poaching, Ethics and Responsibility.

The links, with some pages under development, demonstrated first hand benefits to the communities where they operate and they also showcased the anti-poaching efforts being done by the Outfitter.

This is exactly what is required for the education of anyone who visits the websites of any hunting Outfitter.


Lessons learned.

There has been an excellent lesson played out in parallel to this proposed devolution in the hunting industry. Sex sells. I have to bring sex into this discussion, as most discussions devolve into discussions of sex and this one should be no different.


View attachment 173940



“Exactly a year after Playboy pledged to ban nudity from its magazine, the company has decided to bring it back.

In a statement released on Monday, Playboy's Chief Creative Officer, Cooper Hefner—Hugh Hefner's son who took over the publication last year—in partnership with the content team have unveiled the latest creative evolution of the brand with a new philosophy, which includes reinstating nudity starting with their March/April 2017 issue.


"I'll be the first to admit that the way in which the magazine portrayed nudity was dated, but removing it entirely was a mistake," Cooper explained. "Nudity was never the problem because nudity isn't a problem. Today we're taking our identity back and reclaiming who we are." “



Can the hunting industry learn from that mistake?



“Clean up the industry” was a message from Presidents addresses at AGM’s
NAPHA AGM Address by immediate-past president Kai-Uwe Denker:
“It is no longer acceptable to try and justify unacceptable hunting practices by claiming that ethics and morals are matters of personal opinion. The worldwide community has clearly told us that with this, you have crossed the line. It is no longer good enough for a professional hunter to just drive a Landcruiser off the road and shoot a big boar with a rifle,” Denker said.
The strategy to win back public support for trophy hunting would also involve education and awareness campaigns to teach the hunters about the basics of conservation and sustainable use of wildlife resources.
The out-going association president called for the introduction of a new professional hunter training curriculum that would prioritise conservation, with emphasis on aspects like functioning ecosystems, habitat aspects and populations dynamics.



Then the repudiations and blame by others at a different AGM seem to support the mob attitude. Although recognizing the problem as “Hype” they go on to generalize and condemn and fail to provide a solution.


"…………..The similarities with captive lion breeding are obvious and if we have not learned from the lion situation and the Cecil hype – which after all has put us in the present crisis – we don’t deserve any better."
PHASA AGM Panel Discussion


Being bullied into hiding what we do is not the solution. I have to agree with Denker, that a move to clean up the industry must “involve education and awareness campaigns to teach ….. the basics of conservation and sustainable use of wildlife resources.”


Here is a strong supportive conservation message from Pohamba Penomwenyo Shifeta, Minister of Environment and Tourism for Namibia in which they state,


“The mission of the Ministry of Environment and Tourism is to promote biodiversity conservation in the Namibian environment through the sustainable utilization of natural resources and tourism development for the maximum social and economic benefit of its citizens.
Conservation (Trophy) hunting and the sustainable use of our wildlife is a constitutional obligation in Namibia. Our utilisation of wildlife is guided and informed by sustainability and the application of science. In March 2016, the Namibian Cabinet endorsed our position on conservation hunting and called for a collective campaign against attempts to restrict legal trophy hunting and the export of wildlife products from Namibia.

I have said repeatedly, that banning trophy hunting, which is a significant revenue generator for Namibia and specifically for conservancies, will damage our conservation efforts and destroy the significant successes we have achieved to date. It is a proven fact that sustainable utilisation of wildlife and natural resources is fundamentally and inextricably connected to successful wildlife conservation in our country. Trophy hunting currently adds N$450 million to Namibia’s GDP through the private sector.

All of this is the result of legislation passed 20 years ago to empower local communities to actively manage and use their wildlife.

Legal hunting is an integral part of this conservation strategy, which resulted in healthy national populations of giraffe, leopard, lion, crocodile, rhino, buffalo and cheetah. It is also a lifeline for our communities today …...

We invite trophy hunters from all over the world to experience a true African hunting adventure, knowing that it will make a difference to the livelihoods of the people who live and look after wildlife and that your contribution will enable us to protect those wilderness areas for future generations as called for in our constitution. “



My best wishes to all, in your continued CONSERVATION HUNTING efforts!
@BRICKBURN
Very enlightening and informative.
I especially like the part were the Namibian govt has written hunting into theiconstitution. A very smart and wise move.
As a hunter/conservationist I a m continually telling people of the benefits of hunting both in my own country and Africa.
I am constantly amazed at people's ignorance. I have found that over time even people that are non hunter can be swayed to understanding the benefits of hunting when done in an empathetic way.
When it is explained how the animals are used, our goals of minimal suffering to the animal (one s hot one kill) and how the money from hunting goes back into conservation and antipoaching they seem to understand a lot more and a lot even become more interested in the hows and why's of hunting.
Thank you again for a great article. We can learn a lot from the playboy example.
Bob
 
Jerome, first let me echo your sentiments about Brickburn's post. It is excellent.

Now, let me take issue with your quote: "how afraid some "brave hunters" are of the noise the antis create!"

We've been over this lots of times on this site in various threads. Many hunters are simply not in a position to risk their livelihoods or more by posting trophy pictures. It's easy for those of us (and I include myself here) who have little to lose to poke fun at those who have much to lose, and even easier to suggest they are lacking in courage. But a picture takes on a life of its own on the internet, and the hunter won't be there to explain anything to everyone who sees it. I'm advised that many organizations today do internet searches of social media sites before hiring a candidate for a job. Would or should a young person risk losing a job for the sake of making a point about trophy pictures and trophy hunting? Many can't afford to do that.

When I went hunting with my youngest a couple of years ago, I posted trophy pictures with his face - but not mine - blurred. He is just starting a career in New York, which as we all know is not exactly a hunting mecca. I thought he would have been foolish in the extreme to have put pictures of himself with dead animals on the internet, and he reluctantly agreed.

It is unfortunate in the extreme that this is the situation today. But it is what it is. So it behooves those of us who have little to lose to fight the battle for those who have much to lose. And hopefully we can do that without taking shots at those who aren't so privileged.

I don't mean to sound preachy, and apologies if I do. I know you and I know it's not your intent to make fun of anyone. But reading the quote, that's how it hit me.
@Hank2211
Yes it is up to the strong to protect the ones that are not in the same fortunate position as ourselves (I will not use the term weak as they are protecting themselves from unfortunate discrimination)
My son is 16 and regularly posts his hunts on Facebook. When I told them of the possible consequences he just said if people don't wish to understand me the don't have the right to employ me. The can employ me on my qualifications not my sport/hobby.
Hunting makes him a more rounded and compassionate person with a better understanding of the bush and animals than any greenie will ever be. He has been there done that and has the trophies to prove it, not just the brain washing of the unenlightened book learners.
Bob
 
I am really enjoying ruminating on your article. Thanks!

The trouble we have from a PR prospective is that we kill things. We very deliberately practice and practice some more to be the best we can be at killing animals. Taken out of the larger context that goal runs against most people's basic inclination to avoid harming other creatures. We are a successful species because our basic nature is to help not hurt. Cats don't have big cities and large sporting events because they seem largely inclined the other way!

This article concludes with the hope there is another alternative to hunting in the conservation arena:

https://www.africahunting.com/threads/trophy-hunting-can-help-african-conservation-study-says.35726/

More humans live in cities today and that may be the problem. The context is missing from the act of hunting. They are removed from the basic cycle of life and death in a rural subsistence environment. I can't fault the sentiment of do no harm because I too don't "like" to kill animals. But I greatly enjoy hunting. I enjoy bring home the meat. I take pride in developing a knowledge of the wild animals. I am motivated to stay in shape to cope with the environment. All very cool things. Nothing controversial with this.

"Conservation hunter" captures that sentiment.

The challenge is putting the act of hunting in context. I think more education is required and constant education. More direct comparison studies between areas that are hunted and those that are not. The number one threat to wildlife is habitat loss. Everyone knows that but few can follow the concept to understand utilization of open spaces for conservation. The conservation debate must focus on the protection of the environment in which hunting can occur and not on any one particular species.

I am a conservation hunter. I work to ensure there are huge areas of untamed land. That is my goal.

I think so anyways....
@Pheroze
Mate I will put it in simple terms.
I'm not a CONSERVATION hunter.
IM A GREENIE WITH A GUN. I promote conservation with my hunting. I am a protector of wildlife by removing diseased or older animals to improve genetics of the species. I also remove feral animals to help the native wildlife thrive.
I also promote the bush and am against it's degradation as no bush no animals.
Bob
Forever a greenie with a gun.
 
I was cruising Field Sports Britain

and they mentioned a Canadian "news" program. (I use this term so loosely)
The bias of the interviewer and his ignorance of Africa is blatant.


Sadly, the hunter Jacine Jadresko (instagram @inkedhuntress) being interviewed has fallen into the trap of the regurgitated fabrications about "the Zimbabwe encounter" (ZE) being illegal.

The program interviewer regurgitates verbatim, falsehoods of the "Zimbabwe Encounter" (ZE) as though they are facts. Then uses footage of the lunatic fringe (8 anti-hunters with placards), to support the "wave" against trophy hunting.
The interviewer trying to flog "killing" versus "harvesting".
Jacine does not back down at the onslaught!

She is certainly "in your face" with her style, but stands up well on the Elephant hunting near the end. "What's the difference between that and a deer?" (y)
No response from the interviewer.

Her honesty is her best weapon. An unashamed hunter.
@BRICKBURN
Jacince has more balls than a lot of people non hunters and hunters alike that I know . She says it how it is and doesn't give a flying f### about what others say about it. I like her attitude and how she had the interviewer on the back foot in a polite and respectful manner.
Ten points to her.
Bob
 
The message is good.but the fact is you will hardly ever convince an anti hunter that hunting is beneficial. Why not birth control! Do what you can and know your right but the urbanized world is ever growing. I love my time in the wild but time marches on. I’m not ever going to apologize or antagonize. Play your hand as you see fit. I will never criticize a fellow hunter because there is never an inch given in the name of compromise that results in a gain for our side.Enjoy the sporting life!
 
Louise Gray, author of 'The Ethical Carnivore' gets her first taste of wildfowling with the help of BASC and the Fenland Wildfowlers Association.


I go Fowling in the same spot with that very club. We do stacks of conservation work in the local area. Anyway the other day I went to do a job for a lady who was very much against it all and was saying stuff like all hunters are nasty people and she can tell them a mile away. All along she was saying what a nice young man I was (she needs glasses). Just as I left I pointed to a few nesting tubes that we as a club put up and that I was a hunter. Well her face dropped and couldn't believe it. I pointed out the merits of what we do and the fact that we have a self imposed bag limit etc.
She did change her mind but there are those that will soak up misinformation and take it as gospel.

@BRICKBURN you hit the nail so hard and straight on the head it drove right the way in with one hit!! That was well put and IMO should be published.

The bullying of hunters is a nasty thing. Some of you may or may not know I was the victim of such an act. It resulted in me almost losing my job. I had to point out to the company I work for that what I do in my own time is none of there business and if the did dismiss me I will be taking them to court for bullying and unfair dismissal. Needless to say they soon dropped that like a hot turd!!

What the antis did do for me was open up many doors in the UK hunting community. Since the newspaper articles I have been invited to hunt at some of the best private hunting estates in the UK and get to go back time after time at no financial cost (I do take LOTS of alcohol for people though).

Its good to know that there is a brotherhood out there and we look out for each other. I just want to give a shout out to @Vanguard2279 (I look to him like a brother) for supporting me through all of it and everyone I met at the DSC in 2019 it was the tonic I needed at that time. :D Cheers: :D Cheers:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
57,969
Messages
1,244,274
Members
102,432
Latest member
mv0636
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Grz63 wrote on Werty's profile.
(cont'd)
Rockies museum,
CM Russel museum and lewis and Clark interpretative center
Horseback riding in Summer star ranch
Charlo bison range and Garnet ghost town
Flathead lake, road to the sun and hiking in Glacier NP
and back to SLC (via Ogden and Logan)
Grz63 wrote on Werty's profile.
Good Morning,
I plan to visit MT next Sept.
May I ask you to give me your comments; do I forget something ? are my choices worthy ? Thank you in advance
Philippe (France)

Start in Billings, Then visit little big horn battlefield,
MT grizzly encounter,
a hot springs (do you have good spots ?)
Looking to buy a 375 H&H or .416 Rem Mag if anyone has anything they want to let go of
 
Top