I've just sent my Swarovski binoculars (SLC 10x50) in for repair. They were bought new in 1999. They have had a pretty tough time of it - a lot of stalking and hind shooting in Scotland, being thrown in the back of the argocat, and so on. Anyway, the hinge went. These were sent for repair at the beginning of the year, and two days ago I had an e-mail advising that the repair would be free of charge.
The only thing I don't like about them is the Teutonic eagle which they brand everything with. It seems a bit Nazi-ish to me.
In terms of quality, Swarovski, Leica, and Zeiss are all much of a muchness. To my way of thinking, Swarovski wins on after-market care. Good second tier brands are Opticron and Noblex. Noblex, previously Docter, were the old East German Zeiss, previously marketed as Zeiss Jena.
I noticed at the end of the last century, when computer-controlled manufacturing was adopted in a big way by optics firms, that the quality of binoculars and telescopes improved dramatically. Anything pre-1990, say, is now superseded by much better glass.
One thing you might like to think about is a stalking telescope, although you will need someone to show you how to use it (it does not have a screw-in attachment for a tripod, and is supported on either a stick or, if lying down, your lower leg):
https://grahamsonline.co.uk/optics-c17/telescopes-c33/the-gray-co-stalking-telescope-p1021