So that's my perspective. What say you all? What importance do you place on the retention of a trophy? Why is it important to you? If you couldn't take one for whatever reason, would you still wish to do the hunt?
I can hunt without a trophy.
I also, generally do not hunt, unless I eat the venisson, exemption is pests - foxes and such.
Finally, I have limited space, for trophies, and came to conclusion that I hunt for hunt sake, and in some cases for experience only. Africa, is experience. For example, I wouldnt mind hunting tuskless elephant sometime in the future.
But, mind, there are intrinsic and extrinsic motives. And mine are generally intrinsic.
There certainly are hunters motivated by trophy, only. (extrinsic) to the point, they can even ask Ph to shoot for them, and to complete big 5, spiral slam, whatever...
Once a trophy is taken, it is a memory that will last for ever. Memories are immortal. Memories can be passed to next generation. We are trying to save that moment for ever. I think it is deepest human drive, as described by Freud, to fight for immortality.
How to preserve something that will last for ever?
Scripture, letters, alphabet, is one way of preserving the idea, stone monuments another... in wider perspective of human culture.
But in hunting culture , to cut the story short, nobody else has described it better then Robert Ruark, in Horn of the hunter, 1952:
“
You are not shooting an elephant,” Selby said. “You are shooting the symbol of his tusks. You are not shooting to kill. You are shooting to make immortal the thing you shoot. To kill just anything is a sin. To kill something that will be dead soon, but is so fine as to give you pleasure for years, is wonderful. Everything dies. You just hasten the process. When you shoot a lion you are actually shooting its mane, something that will make you proud. You are shooting for yourself, not shooting just to kill”