Survey: rings or rail

I’m not sure they do, yes the scope with a rail is heavier than the same model without rail but I think the extra weight of the rings would make it more or less the same.
Sorry I thought the post was about a pic rail versus rings. The original post said nothing about a European rail. Of course I do not want rings on a Blaser R8. I want a rail scope. It is a brilliant design!
 
Just to throw a little curve ball, just saw this mounting on one of Holts December offerings. Anyone have a clue on how this was attached? Half rings???

Lot 1254
1636964239603.png
 
For a bolt action I prefer rings just for the fact it gives me more room for fingers when single loading cartridges for any other action type rails are fine. If you are mounting your scope correctly there really should not be any alignment issues unless the drilled holes are out of straight and square. Never had an issue with that but I know of people who have.
 
Just to throw a little curve ball, just saw this mounting on one of Holts December offerings. Anyone have a clue on how this was attached? Half rings???

Lot 1254
View attachment 436444

Quite common. Braised on. This particular gun was built by a master. Looks like a ferlach to me.
 
Quite common. Braised on. This particular gun was built by a master. Looks like a ferlach to me.
Do I understand correctly that this means that the mount is now integral to the optic and cannot be removed anymore? Unless perhaps by destroying the optic in question?
 
Do I understand correctly that this means that the mount is now integral to the optic and cannot be removed anymore? Unless perhaps by destroying the optic in question?

Correct. And a German or Austrian master gunsmith would retort: moving it is unnecessary as I mounted it to absolutely perfection. And what if the optic breaks? Answer: it’s Austrian glass, it shall not break.

But just like rail mounts used until ten years ago, they are drilled or braised, one-time installation designs. Only the newest rails are adjustable and reusable.
 
Correct. And a German or Austrian master gunsmith would retort: moving it is unnecessary as I mounted it to absolutely perfection. And what if the optic breaks? Answer: it’s Austrian glass, it shall not break.

But just like rail mounts used until ten years ago, they are drilled or braised, one-time installation designs. Only the newest rails are adjustable and reusable.
The newer rails as for Swarovski and Zeiss are probably more practical, but wow is that a beautiful and elegant way to mount a scope! And it permits a little extra engraving surface. Thanks for having enlightened me!
 
The newer rails as for Swarovski and Zeiss are probably more practical, but wow is that a beautiful and elegant way to mount a scope! And it permits a little extra engraving surface. Thanks for having enlightened me!


It's important to understand that newer rails are not as low as the original rails of 10,20,30 years ago.

The old rails were ultra low becasue: the dove tail was tiny and the base mount clamped to the dovetail. Once eye relieve and adjustment was perfect, a hole was drilled through the dovetail of the scope to make it immune from recoil and to ensure the mounts were perpetually in perfect alignment. (that's why all used older rail mount scopes have holes drilled in them...from prior custom install)

The newer rails are much deeper. The additional depth provides some sort of way to prevent movement. Most frequently its geared teeth or notches so that recoil cannot shift the optic. This makes the scope adjustable if length of pull changes, and it also allows reuse of the optic on another rifle if upgrades occur. But the teeth take up space. In another design, its a blind internal raceway and that takes up space too.

The newer rails aren't necessarily "Better" because of the cons; more height, more complicated mounts, higher and heavier mounts. But the pros are; reuse, easier installation, thousands less parts to stock for mounts and "rings", and broader compatibility.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
57,969
Messages
1,244,250
Members
102,430
Latest member
normachapa
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Grz63 wrote on Werty's profile.
(cont'd)
Rockies museum,
CM Russel museum and lewis and Clark interpretative center
Horseback riding in Summer star ranch
Charlo bison range and Garnet ghost town
Flathead lake, road to the sun and hiking in Glacier NP
and back to SLC (via Ogden and Logan)
Grz63 wrote on Werty's profile.
Good Morning,
I plan to visit MT next Sept.
May I ask you to give me your comments; do I forget something ? are my choices worthy ? Thank you in advance
Philippe (France)

Start in Billings, Then visit little big horn battlefield,
MT grizzly encounter,
a hot springs (do you have good spots ?)
Looking to buy a 375 H&H or .416 Rem Mag if anyone has anything they want to let go of
 
Top