Paul Babaz
AH senior member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2015
- Messages
- 81
- Reaction score
- 119
- Location
- Atlanta, Georgia
- Member of
- SCI, NRA, DSC, HSC,GSCO, WSF
- Hunted
- RSA, Mozambique, Tanzania
@Hank2211 Again, I am speaking for myself and not SCI when I say, I find it unfortunate, that PHASA was split and lost members, and a new group was formed. To be honest, can't say I support the resignations, because you had a group of dedicated folks who left over what was a very controversial issue and although they started a new group, it's just more hunters divided which is not good for the hunting community. I have friends in both organizations and intend to keep these friendships. I understand what the difference of opinion is, as I have attended the PHASA AGM before and have seen it first hand. This being said, I would guess that on the total, I would bet that both groups AGREE on 99% of everything else and it's unfortunate that the 1% split a group. Some of you may recall just a few years ago in Wisconsin, the Crossbow guys were in a tussle with the vertical bow guys over the archery season. It's never a good thing to have hunters split over a difference of opinion, we should be able to disagree, and still work together on the big picture.Paul, I do appreciate your presence on this forum.
With respect to this comment, I have to say I find it a bit ironic when you consider how many people resigned from PHASA over a decision it made with which they didn't agree.
I assume you support those resignations?
By the way, I'm not going to resign from SCI!