Rafiki
AH enthusiast
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2023
- Messages
- 409
- Reaction score
- 882
- Location
- Florida and Minnesota
- Media
- 6
- Hunted
- Tanzania
They both are RSM's, It's simply that over the few years the made some slight modifications. Yours is a bit older than mine. Do a serial number lookup. Yours is a gen-1. Mine is a gen-2 vintage 2006. Other than a few of these small changes they are essentially the same rifle.I have a question on the RSM and there is obviously a lot of knowledge about them on this thread.
I bought a 375 H&H a couple of years ago and love it. Compared to my Kimber 300, it is definitely a heavier "clunkier" stock and very heavy barreled. But when I shoot it, I lose any complaints-good trigger, good action, the thickness and weight of the stock seems to steady everything off sticks for me and it groups extremely well. I used it on my hunt with Kowas in Namibia and it was no problem to carry, a joy to shoot and performed flawlessly.
My question is the two styles I see on the barrel band. Mine is in the forearm like the picture of @Bonk rifle in this thread. But a lot of them have the band on the barrel, free of the fore end, like the OP. My understanding is they are both RSM labeled but when/why the difference?
Send a picture if you have one.