Doug Hamilton
AH elite
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2020
- Messages
- 1,430
- Reaction score
- 3,694
- Location
- Washington State
- Member of
- Mule Deer Foundation, RMEF, SCI
- Hunted
- Zimbabwe, US, Canada
I would very.much.like to explain in layman's terms exactly how the two actions differ and why the CRF is superior, but I am.not enough of an engineer to do it. The CRF controls the round from the magazine well all the way into the chamber, and the heavy claw extractor pulls the empty case out with better reliability than than the small clip extractor on most PF rifles. One gunsmith friend of mine once told me that he had replaced many PF extractors that had broken. Although extraction was not the problem in the story I related, the PH had other reliability issues with that rifle as well and sold it. He now hunts and backs up clients with CRF rifles only. This seems to be true of most PH's as well. There are people who could explain it much better than I can.Thank you for this anecdote, could you explain in layman’s terms how a CRF and a PF work differently that the situation you described could not happen with a CRF?
I own both, and clearly prefer CRF over PF, but mostly this is for their smoothness and good looks, more than any difference in reliability or safety.
As a reference, my centerfire PF rifle is a Mauser M03. My CRF rifles are dumoulin/francotte actioned.
I really would like to better understand the mechanics of those differences and how one is superior to the other, as this is not completely clear to me.
Thank you
Is it possible that my story could have happened if the PH had been using a CRF rifle instead? Maybe, but it didn't. I tend to draw on my personal experience. To be fair, I have killed many deer, a couple of pronghorns, and some African PG with PF rifles and never had a failure, but just one at the wrong time could be catastrophic.