It is very interesting that you see English rifles starting to come around to the various accuracy features found on competition rifle for years. I think it is a bit of the difference between art and tools. Too many smiths see their work as "art" and not a tool to be used. I've had discussions with very well known smiths who said that they didn't care for bedding, pillars, or similar...and that 1.5 MOA accuracy was fine. They opined that it wasn't needed to true up a Mauser and that barreling was only measured to the thousandth...
Same group of smiths were proud that you had to paint the "bedding" on with a fine brush...which is contrary to the basic material properties of the bedding material. It's normal for competition rifles to be inletted well overside so that the bedding material can be thick and strong, well bonded to the stock...
That would be unheard of in the world of rifles used for any sport or where an accuracy standard was required....
Plus, those customs were 30k$ rifles...for that money, it should have bedding and an accuracy guarantee.
Heck, a factory Model 70 is usually a MOA gun for less than 1k.
Sometimes, I wish more smiths would spend time on Snipershide, in the Gunsmith section. Longrifles Inc has it down to a science...inletting, bedding, and so on.
Then again...they have rifles that won olympic gold under their belt.