Roughly a couple of hundred people on this forum know me personally.. more than a hundred have been in my home... Id venture a guess that to a man (and woman) they'd advise you that I am far from "on a bit of a tilt".. but don't take my word for it.. ask around..
I do however admit I don't suffer fools well, and will call one out every time they make ridiculous statements that are unfounded in any evidence or truth and try to declare them as they were facts..
you have a habit of doing exactly that.. so, don't be surprised when you continue to get called out when doing so..
Or.. feel free to bring evidence and facts to support your arguments.. you clearly told others to "do the work" yesterday... you could always hold yourself to the same standard..
FWIW, Im an equal opportunity caller outer.. and have on more than a few occasions raised points with people on the far right as well as those on the far left, and countless that fall somewhere in between when they present opinions as facts without any supporting evidence...
While you're clearly bitching about my responses to you.. I still haven't seen a single piece of evidence presented to support your statements... how about we start there before we decide who the fool is..
Or.. if you prefer, just keep blowing hot, unsubstantiated air.. and see how many people actually buy into your statements or care about your opinions..
One would think that of these legions of internet character references, were they of any character or particular standing, would probably agree that your comments are rude and crass. And that they demonstrate that for all the sermons about emotional responses you've been so eager to give, seems you're incapable of heeding your own advice.
Physician, heal thyself.
But please elaborate on where you would like me to "bring the facts" further, on matters almost wholly relating to opinion.
While also noting that you seem to operate and float not on fact, but on a self sustaining cloud of opinion and supposition when it comes to Trump and a few choice members of the inner circle.
Happy to elaborate to please your somewhat delicate sensibilities. And refusal to grasp an olive branch and find common ground when offered.
Please tell me what you'd have me elaborate on. Knowing based on your posts that I have more than a century of tenuous connection to draw on ala Halifax Explosion. Surely I can find something that will suffice.
Perhaps I'll ask a direct question back.
Let us know how and why you think Trump, and the actions of this administration, fit any definition of traditionally conservative. I'll be eager to see just how far and wide these particular goalposts will shift.
The only hot air being blown, and habitually so, are those that would bend every principle in their body to continue to defend Trump and his actions and claim they represent stoic conservatism somehow.
I'm just calling you out. Because like you claim, I also don't suffer fools.
You can have him as your guy. You can prefer him to Kamala. But you can't with a straight face claim he's the embodiment of conservative thought or any type of rationality and expect to be taken seriously except by those also enamoured by the cult of personality for the moment.
I suspect a good many of those hundreds you refer to are in the same boat. You're just the spokesman here claiming everything he does is 8d chess and anyone who would question it or his credentials as a Conservative political thinker is in the wrong.
With appropriate respect to you and your imagined Internet credentials, I find them wanting.
You're free to find mine wanting as well, as you obviously do, and I'm fine with it. I'm more trying to point out the foolishness of you doubling down on them and leaning on them.
