So if any and all trade deficits numbers and comparisons are a red herring then we come back to my original theory trump lied about the whole trade issue and the security issue he used to justify his trade war, weaponized the u.s. economy to manipulate industry solely because he wanted a bigger slice of the pie.
the US is going to have a trade deficit with almost everyone on the planet.. it has the largest economy in the world, the highest per capita GDP in the world, and Americans are culturally major consumers (everyone wants bigger, more, etc..etc..)..
There are a number of countries where the US has a significant trade surplus like the Netherlands, Hong Kong, Australia, and the UK.. and there are a ton of countries where the US has a significant trade deficit like China, the EU, Mexico, Taiwan, Canada (the list where the US has a deficit is significantly longer than the surplus list)..
Surpluses and deficits are driven numerous factors.. exchange rates, global economic conditions, trade policies, domestic demand, production capabilities, etc..etc.. and have very little to do with whether a country is a good or "fair" trading partner..
Being good or fair certainly can impact pricing (tariffs, taxes, etc purposely imposed to limit access to a specific market.. like Canada desiring to protect its dairy market)... but "good" and "fair" are subjective terms.... i.e. if Canada desires to protect its dairy market and intentionally puts policy, tariffs, etc in place to keep the US out of its dairy market.. then is it unfair that the US decides it wants to protect one of its markets and intentionally puts policy and tariffs in place to keep Canada out of that market?.. it would appear that many Canadians believe that to be so..
We discussed the blurred lines between security issues and the tariff issues.. no doubt they exist..
That said, if this were solely the masking of security issues and attempting to leverage Canada into taking certain security measures through the implementation of tariffs, then why did Trump just amounce a 10% tariff on ALL products and services generated outside of the US (from any country on the planet), and reciprocal tariffs on more than 60 countries (including Canada)?
Trump likes making "deals".. the security issue is potentially one way a creative Canadian government could convince Trump to reduce certain tariffs or give some relief to certain markets.. Mexico stepping up on the security side definitely gave them some relief.. but Canadian leaders wanted to stand by the position that the amount of dope and criminals coming into the US from Canada is not substantial, therefore we don't really want to address it, AND we also want to go back and forth on tariffs..
I see the security issue as an opportunity for Canada.. how hard would it really be to commit to truly working toward a secure border (whether Canada thinks its necessary or not, clearly your southern neighbor believes it is necessary) in exchange for maybe the US providing measurable relief to the tariffs it is going to impose on Canadian oil, minerals, and automotive industries?
But instead, here we are..