Politics

An interesting article.

From the article.
Some Trump advisers and friends have peddled the line that he merely wants a level tariff playing field. But the average U.S. tariff rate (2.7%) on foreign goods is higher than the average rate in Canada (1.8%), Japan (2%) and Europe (2%), and roughly the same as in Mexico, according to the World Bank. While other countries impose non-tariff barriers, so does the U.S.
 
Denmark ignores Greenland. They pay a paltry 600 million to Greenland welfare per year.

Greenland will eventually have a “Free Association” agreement with the US. The free world is safer with the US and Greenland association than Denmark. No shade on Denmark they actually have a formidable military for their size. But they will sit by and watch. Or worse allow China and Russia to elbow into Greenland.

Military leaders tried to talk Biden into taking this issue up. He talked about it, but did nothing about it.

It’s not a random Trump idea as biased people keep repeating.
 
Last edited:
From AI


A free association agreement, like the Compacts of Free Association (COFA) between the United States and the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM), the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI), and the Republic of Palau, is a treaty that establishes a special relationship between a sovereign state and another, granting the latter certain rights and responsibilities, including defense and economic assistance, while the former retains self-governance

The Triple Alliancewas a defensive military alliance between Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy. It was formed on 20 May 1882 and renewed periodically until it expired in 1915 during World War

Perhaps a 3 way. Denmark, Greenland and U.S.
 
The first persons statement is absolutely incorrect…

He states there is no military threat… the Russians aren’t a threat, etc..

No one is worried about a Russian armored division scooting across Greenland to get to the US through Canada… that is true..

The issue with Greenland is the artic is the shortest and most efficient route for Russian ICBMs to hit US and Canadian targets.. it’s also a fast and efficient route for Chinas nuclear threat…

It is also positioned along critical North Atlantic shipping lanes that are of strategic importance to both Canada and the US (and Europe if Europe intends on trading with the US and Canada)

The strategic military issue associated with Greenland is nuclear defense and naval defense of shipping lanes… no one is worried about an occupying force having to be thwarted…

Denmark has openly admitted it has failed to adequately adhere to its NATO commitments regarding Greenland and its defense…

What you say is basically right...even if the question of Denmark have done enough regarding NATO commitement at Greenland is debatable..

But there are other implications to this... If USA militarize Greenland heavily then Russia will answer...it will accelerate an arms race in the Arctic.

It may also cause trouble for Norway regarding control on Svalbard that is under our jurisdiction...something Russia repeatedly challenge us over. Svalbard is not militarized, a part of the Svalbard Treaty (of 1920). There is no doubt that Russia wants control on Svalbard..
 
Please educate us on Putin's process..... because like the Europeans we hear you condemn the actions of others while offering nothing but criticism for those who are actually trying to get something done.
You educate yourself about Putin and get your news from multiple sources instead of Russian sponsored media,
I don't have time for that.
 
The war in Ukraine is developing in an interesting way. Zelensky has rejected the minerals deal now that it has grown into something far more invasive and includes his nation's nuclear power assets. He also has rejected the Trump administration's claim that the aid provided (alleged to be 350 - 500 billion USD depending upon which idiot is talking) should be repaid. Repayment was never part of the original Congressional authorization and appropriation, and was never near 350 billion much less 500 billion.

Ukraine is currently killing Russians at an accelerating rate, to include picking off yet another general officer, US Three-star equivalent billet, just a couple of days ago. European 155mm production is finally reaching steady replenishment levels and their domestic drone and long range missile production is gaining real momentum. UA army units also are conducting successful regional counter attacks including erasing most of the last six month's of Russian gains (at horrific human cost) in the area around Toretsk, Most interestingly, the UA apparently has now pushed some three kilometers inside the Belgorod Oblast of Russia in an incursion mirroring their efforts in Kursk.

Meanwhile, Putin is demanding as a precondition to a ceasefire that the Ukrainian government be replaced by an international body until new elections can be held. Needless to say the Ukrainian people and government are soundly rejecting that notion.

Unless Donald Trump can find the courage, or perhaps independence is a better term, to use a big stick with Putin, Ukraine and Europe might as well fight on together. A Trump negotiated peace deal is looking more and more like abject surrender.
 
Thank you for that update
 
The war in Ukraine is developing in an interesting way. Zelensky has rejected the minerals deal now that it has grown into something far more invasive and includes his nation's nuclear power assets. He also has rejected the Trump administration's claim that the aid provided (alleged to be 350 - 500 billion USD depending upon which idiot is talking) should be repaid. Repayment was never part of the original Congressional authorization and appropriation, and was never near 350 billion much less 500 billion.

Ukraine is currently killing Russians at an accelerating rate, to include picking off yet another general officer, US Three-star equivalent billet, just a couple of days ago. European 155mm production is finally reaching steady replenishment levels and their domestic drone and long range missile production is gaining real momentum. UA army units also are conducting successful regional counter attacks including erasing most of the last six month's of Russian gains (at horrific human cost) in the area around Toretsk, Most interestingly, the UA apparently has now pushed some three kilometers inside the Belgorod Oblast of Russia in an incursion mirroring their efforts in Kursk.

Meanwhile, Putin is demanding as a precondition to a ceasefire that the Ukrainian government be replaced by an international body until new elections can be held. Needless to say the Ukrainian people and government are soundly rejecting that notion.

Unless Donald Trump can find the courage, or perhaps independence is a better term, to use a big stick with Putin, Ukraine and Europe might as well fight on together. A Trump negotiated peace deal is looking more and more like abject surrender.
Thats been the observation overhere all the time. Trump is sidelined. But don`t worry. Trumps ego is bigger than europe, Putin and Ukraine all together. He will fix it,
 
The armybase in Greenland started with 10000 US personal. 6000 soldiers + 4000 civilians. Because of "threats" over the years its been cut down to 150 guys + some janitors. Let it sink in!!..

There’s nothing to sink in… the threat has changed…

Post WW2 everyone was worried about ground troops

Today the threat is ICBMs over the artic

Manning detection stations and/or anti ballistics mission stations is a very different proposition than positioning an armored division..
 
][emoji6][emoji6][emoji[emoji6]]" data-quote="rigbymauser" data-source="post: 0" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">

I hardly think an op-ed piece is a genuine indicator of federal government policy…

Your source is about as valuable as an article in the national enquirer..
 
Meanwhile in Bangkok, and not exactly political unless aid to the region becomes an issue, having a dip in the hotel's vanishing edge swimming pool takes on a whole new meaning.

I was in my 12th floor office in Herndon, VA back in August of 2011 and can testify that a 5.8 is no fun when a hundred miles away. I can't imagine what these folks experienced.

 
Meanwhile in Bangkok, and not exactly political unless aid to the region becomes an issue, having a dip in the hotel's vanishing edge swimming pool takes on a whole new meaning.

I was in my 12th floor office in Herndon, VA back in August of 2011 and can testify that a 5.8 is no fun when a hundred miles away. I can't imagine what these folks experienced.


A good buddy of mine, a former 18C is currently vacationing in the area… he’s ok, but reports it’s been quite a ride.. an 18A that’s been living in Bangkok for the last 20+ years also reports that he and his wife are ok, they they have extensive property damage…

I definitely feel for them… it’s going to be a tough recovery that’s going to take a while…
 
I'm sure you're aware of this, but at least for the EU, if you're an enterprise, you can reclaim VAT on all inputs, including goods or services paid for in the production of your own product.

As a general explanation:
"Here are the different types of VAT businesses must collect, pay, and calculate:

  • Output VAT: This is the VAT businesses charge on their sales (outputs). For example, if a business sells a product for £200 with a 20% VAT rate, they charge £240, with £40 as the output VAT.
  • Input VAT: This is the VAT businesses pay on their purchases (inputs). For instance, if a business buys raw materials for £100 and the supplier charges 20% VAT, the business pays £120, with £20 as the input VAT.
  • Net VAT payable: When businesses file their VAT returns, they calculate the difference between the output VAT and the input VAT. If the output VAT is higher, they pay the difference to HMRC. If the input VAT is higher, they can reclaim the difference."

In the example above, the TOTAL VAT payable to the Government would be 40 OUT - 20 IN = 20 on the GBP200 in sales. The consumer pays the full 40 to the company. The company keeps half to reclaim the 20 they already spent on raw material 'input VAT', the other 20 goes to the government. The total VAT charged to the supply chain for all the intermediary materials at the end of all the accounting drills = 0.

If you're BMW, you buy steel, you pay VAT, you make parts, you pay VAT, and so on and so forth. At the end of all of that, you work out all the VAT you already paid, then subtract that from the VAT you collect from your final goods you sell to a consumer. Effective net VAT in the supply chain = 0. The only time VAT is actually paid is when the consumer buys the car...

The reason that taxes paid to make the item aren't listed on a receipt is because there effectively AREN'T any taxes paid on materials used to make the item. Just the same as the US. The only time VAT is charged and NOT reclaimed is when the end consumer buys the end product. The maximum that the consumer has to pay is always 20% of the final sales price. That's it.

As such, no, VAT is not 'paid at each stage of development', or rather, it is, and then it's reclaimed.

For a good manufactured elsewhere, the same applies. VAT charged during production of the good is obviously 0, it was made elsewhere. The total VAT charged on the imported good is 20% of the final purchase price paid by the end consumer. The difference? All 20% goes straight to the government, as there's no 'pre-paid in-process VAT' that the company can reclaim (because they didn't pay any in the supply chain anyway). No net benefit to the company either way.

Even assuming your statement was true (which again, it isn't), I fail to see how EU governments willfully making their own internal enterprises less efficient would somehow lead to it being a barrier to trade for US companies trying to break into their markets and compete with them on price. If anything, it would rather seem that the opposite would occur...
20% is still highway robbery--something all governments are good at...
 
The war in Ukraine is developing in an interesting way. Zelensky has rejected the minerals deal now that it has grown into something far more invasive and includes his nation's nuclear power assets. He also has rejected the Trump administration's claim that the aid provided (alleged to be 350 - 500 billion USD depending upon which idiot is talking) should be repaid. Repayment was never part of the original Congressional authorization and appropriation, and was never near 350 billion much less 500 billion.

Ukraine is currently killing Russians at an accelerating rate, to include picking off yet another general officer, US Three-star equivalent billet, just a couple of days ago. European 155mm production is finally reaching steady replenishment levels and their domestic drone and long range missile production is gaining real momentum. UA army units also are conducting successful regional counter attacks including erasing most of the last six month's of Russian gains (at horrific human cost) in the area around Toretsk, Most interestingly, the UA apparently has now pushed some three kilometers inside the Belgorod Oblast of Russia in an incursion mirroring their efforts in Kursk.

Meanwhile, Putin is demanding as a precondition to a ceasefire that the Ukrainian government be replaced by an international body until new elections can be held. Needless to say the Ukrainian people and government are soundly rejecting that notion.

Unless Donald Trump can find the courage, or perhaps independence is a better term, to use a big stick with Putin, Ukraine and Europe might as well fight on together. A Trump negotiated peace deal is looking more and more like abject surrender.

Personally, I feel that the US has proven itself highly unreliable as an ally. Ukraine is smart to focus future alliances with European neighbors, and tell Trump to go stuff himself.

The thing I think is interesting is that our current administration, led by Trump, does not seem to connect the dots. They don’t seem to realize that leaving allies hanging out to dry will come home to roost in our negotiations in other areas. Greenland or the Panama Canal come to mind. Being untrustworthy makes you a very undesirable partner in business and politics.
 
Now if we could just get Trump to stop going off on tangents, it would be great. Or, maybe Vance can take over sometime soon.

I guess I'm not feeling like Vance is a 100% more certain option? That Oval Office Zelensky dust-up left me a little shaken.
 
Last edited:
20% is still highway robbery--something all governments are good at...
On this, we totally agree.

5% in the US is bad enough, but I do not miss VAT at all.

If the average EU citizen wants to suck it up, then I guess it'll stay though.

The purpose of my post was to clarify what it is and how it is applied, in response to a suggestion that it was somehow 'doubling the costs of complex goods' and a separate post suggesting it was a barrier to US trade. Which in both cases it very evidently isn't.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
60,081
Messages
1,306,223
Members
109,888
Latest member
tefarin649
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

MooseHunter wrote on Tyguy's profile.
Im interested in the Zeiss Scope. Any nicks or dings? Good and clear? I have on and they are great scopes
Available Game 2025!

White Wildebeest.
CAustin wrote on ZANA BOTES SAFARI's profile.
Zana it was very good to see you at SCI National. Best wishes to you for a great season.
 
Top