Politics

Wouldn't it be great if someone poisoned him for a change?! Or, the bars were removed from the windows of his office so he could fall out while trying to get some fresh air? One can only hope...

My concern is party leaders in Russia that appear to be possible replacements don’t look like they’d be any better for Russia or the rest of the world…

It’s going to take a half dozen or so senior Russian officials falling out of windows before things improve I’m afraid..
 
My concern is party leaders in Russia that appear to be possible replacements don’t look like they’d be any better for Russia or the rest of the world…

It’s going to take a half dozen or so senior Russian officials falling out of windows before things improve I’m afraid..

There are always a few who do in a regime change
 
][emoji6]][emoji6][emoji6][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]" data-quote="Scott CWO" data-source="post: 0" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">
This has got to be the most foolish thing that you have ever posted on AH and that is saying something! You need to educate your self on fracking and the environmental hoops that oil companies have to jump through in the USA compared to Russia. You really have to expand your sources of information. You have been brainwashed.

I’m hoping his comment was made sarcastically.
 
Russia does not dominate the market on political leaders that should be “shown the window” :cool:

No but it is a dangerous precedent to set , when one starts executing tyrants great care must be taken lest we become tyrants our own selves. Putin probably thinks he’s a swell guy and all of his actions are justified.
 
This will hit Europe especially hard. The EU automakers who are assembling in Mexico for the American market have just found their plants superfluous. Look for EU automakers to start building plants in America if they still want the American market.

It will also hit US consumers hard.
Even if they build a plant here(which takes years) the cars will cost a lot more.
US labor is very expensive compared to where they're built now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cls
It will also hit US consumers hard.
Even if they build a plant here(which takes years) the cars will cost a lot more.
US labor is very expensive compared to where they're built now.

Yah, let's keep that manufacturing elsewhere.
 
America had less than $1T of debt when Reagan started rearming. It now has over $36T in debt. Last years interest expense was over $1T. America is broke. As is Europe. America voted to fix it's internal issues and step back from being the worlds policeman. Europe wants to continue the war but has no military.

Russia is a neighbor to Europe. It is smart for Europe to rearm. Why is it America's responsibility to continue the war instead of trying to figure out a way towards peace?
First Trump administration increased the debt $7.8 trillion.
What makes you believe he'll do it this time?
Tax cuts is not the way to reduce it nor the tariffs.
Also, peace is not a one way process nor it's an agreement where one side gets all they want.
I guess you don't want to see or understand how Putin is approaching this process.
 
Yah, let's keep that manufacturing elsewhere.
You want to build everything here?
Be my guest and see how it ends up.
I'm sure you're not buying or using anything made here including the parts.
 
If Ukraine and Europe cave in you will be left with a very short list of friends globally..
Then why don't our global friends meet their NATO obligations in defense spending as they were required to do years ago and never did?

Because it's easier to sit back and let the USA handle everything while EU countries spend their money on migrants and stick to their tried and true method of international military lack of action and preparation.

Germany when asked about their NATO obligations while funding Russia's war machine with energy purchases........
Screenshot 2025-03-27 114818.png
 
First Trump administration increased the debt $7.8 trillion.
What makes you believe he'll do it this time?
Tax cuts is not the way to reduce it nor the tariffs.
Also, peace is not a one way process nor it's an agreement where one side gets all they want.
I guess you don't want to see or understand how Putin is approaching this process.
Please educate us on Putin's process..... because like the Europeans we hear you condemn the actions of others while offering nothing but criticism for those who are actually trying to get something done.
 
You want to build everything here?
Be my guest and see how it ends up.
I'm sure you're not buying or using anything made here including the parts.

So you want to have everything made elsewhere? Be my guest and see how that ends up.....oh wait, we've already gone down that path a bit too far haven't we?

I'm sure I don't have much of anything that was entirely made here. Don't get so hung up on labor costs, it's only one part of the total cost to manufacture. There are plenty of other ways to offset those costs.

How would I know? Well my company manufactures all over the world. This is for a number of reasons. The primary reason would be that in order to sell our products all over the world competitively there are those regions that require us to manufacture within their region. You know, the same sort of policy your criticizing.

One of those manufacturing facilities is without question in one of the most expensive countries on the planet, specifically in Europe. There were other countries competing for that facility, less expensive locations. So what might you think they did in order to win our factory so that we could maintain price competitiveness?
 
Then why don't our global friends meet their NATO obligations in defense spending as they were required to do years ago and never did?

Because it's easier to sit back and let the USA handle everything while EU countries spend their money on migrants and stick to their tried and true method of international military lack of action and preparation.

Germany when asked about their NATO obligations while funding Russia's war machine with energy purchases........
View attachment 674835

Europe is now rearming...800 billion euros are on the table.

Sure..we need to do it..Hegseth is to reduce your military spending with 40%...8% pro anno from now..so perhaps you will have to pull out of Europe by necessity..
 
I am all for bringing our manufacturing back to the states. I justt wonder how many years it will take to get some of this manufacturing up and running in the U.S. and at a comparable / reasonable market price.
 
No but it is a dangerous precedent to set , when one starts executing tyrants great care must be taken lest we become tyrants our own selves. Putin probably thinks he’s a swell guy and all of his actions are justified.

"Putin probably thinks he’s a swell guy"...

I almost spewed morning coffee reading that. It makes me think of bad guys in movies who eventually say something, on the cusp of being killed by the good guy, to the effect of "it wasn't personal."
 
]][emoji6][emoji6]" data-quote="Wheels" data-source="post: 0" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">
For the past [emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]] years Europe has excluded American products with tariffs, VAT, etc.

Kindly explain how VAT tax, a sales tax, applied to most goods on the market, regardless of the place of origin and including local and imported goods at the exact same rate is excluding American, or for that matter any other country’s product?
 
I am all for bringing our manufacturing back to the states. I justt wonder how many years it will take to get some of this manufacturing up and running in the U.S. and at a comparable / reasonable market price.
Thus I think is a very pertinent question, and one not considered often enough.

Most people think that there's some magic button businesses can press and suddenly change up their entire supply chain, but it's not true. Stuff takes time.

As an interesting case study, Hyundai recently opened a plant in Georgia (state, not country) to manufacture their evs for the us market.

They started planning the project in 2021 in response to the Biden administrations 'green economy' stuff. They broke ground a few months later, and the first car rolled off the line in 2024. That was significantly ahead of schedule.

The Hyundai example also underlines another consideration. The risks of a changing political environment.

Biden was fairly supportive of evs, and Hyundai planned that facility based on projections under his administration. Trump however is rather less supportive of the green agenda, and I expect that Hyundais initial business case is now looking rather less rosy. But they've already spent all the money, the plant is operational. Sunk costs are sunk, and now they have to deal with a crappy roi. I expect that even under the initial business case, the plant wouldn't pay for itself until 2030 or so.

So tariffs.

if Toyota responds to tariffs by onshoring lexus car production, we might expect the first us made lexus to roll off the line in 2027 or so. It might be as late as 2030. In the interim, us consumers simply have to pay more for japanese made lexuses.

For Toyota to do that, they also need to be very confident that tariffs are here to stay. Not just through this term, but through the next term, and probably the one after. That's the time horizon to recoup the investment after all.

If I was a Toyota exec, I wouldn't be very confident in that. Trump is mercurial and changes his mind constantly. I have no idea if this is bluster or policy. I have no idea if the next candidate will be an r or a d, and even if they are an r, will they promote Trumps agenda? As such, there is an enormous risk premium to that enormous investment. That might be enough for me to simply stick with japan, eat what tariff cost i can, and pass the rest onto the consumer.
 
Then why don't our global friends meet their NATO obligations in defense spending as they were required to do years ago and never did?

I believe everyone should pay their own bills and do what they can to provide security for themselves. Now, regarding the “no one is meeting their agreed obligations” mantra repeated a lot as of late. Below is a graph from NATO’s website showing each of the member states’ spending. According to the official data eight countries are not meeting their agreed spending targets. There are 32 members states.

Image1743176637.111150.jpg



 

Forum statistics

Threads
60,061
Messages
1,305,653
Members
109,818
Latest member
AndrewCull
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

MooseHunter wrote on Tyguy's profile.
Im interested in the Zeiss Scope. Any nicks or dings? Good and clear? I have on and they are great scopes
Available Game 2025!

White Wildebeest.
CAustin wrote on ZANA BOTES SAFARI's profile.
Zana it was very good to see you at SCI National. Best wishes to you for a great season.
 
Top