Politics

[Tubby’s Canteen]

One thing to note, potash isn’t a fertilizer in itself, and not all regions/soil types require it. We never used the stuff in my part of Alberta.

To my understanding corn is a nitrogen depleting crop and it is required for continuous planting without rotational crop planting schedules but I could be totally off base on that the gentleman who explained it to me could qualify for a tinfoil hat and I have not yet had time to verify his explanation.

 

[Wyatt Smith]

To my understanding corn is a nitrogen depleting crop and it is required for continuous planting without rotational crop planting schedules but I could be totally off base on that the gentleman who explained it to me could qualify for a tinfoil hat and I have not yet had time to verify his explanation.

You are correct.

 

[Aaron N]

I agree with you that not all soils need K, but it is one of the three primary macronutrients (N-P-K), so by definition it is a fertilizer.

There you go waving your chemical degree around again! My mistake. Did you guys require it out east?

 

[Tubby’s Canteen]

You are correct.

Thanks Wyatt my farming experience is mostly limited to cattle that’s why I defer to you on planting matters.

 

[Aaron N]

Thanks Wyatt my farming experience is mostly limited to cattle that’s why I defer to you on planting matters.

Funny enough, when I think of Nova Scotia, cattle never come to mind!

 

[Wyatt Smith]

Thanks Wyatt my farming experience is mostly limited to cattle that’s why I defer to you on planting matters.

I’m not much of a cattlemen so we could make a good team.

 

[Tubby’s Canteen]

Funny enough, when I think of Nova Scotia, cattle never come to mind!

Agricultural is a major industry in Nova Scotia. Traditionally agricultural and fishing go hand and hand. Our fisheries are only seasonal employment. My mothers parents ran a hundred or so head of limousines and had a federally inspected slaughter house on property at the hight of the farm. Father and I ran twenty cow/calf pairs our best years and butchered farm gate style. Until the up turn in the lobster industry most men were involved in fishing as well as farming and forestry work.

 

[YancyW]

In the event of a Canadian federal leader having stones enough to actually shut of potash oil and electricity given the volatility of your president I would honestly fear U.S. military action.

What happened with China?

 

[Tubby’s Canteen]

What happened with China?

You lost me can you clarify the question?

 

[MauserM03Blog]

I agree with planting trees, the US has more trees then in recorded history. Trees like CO2. I do not believe that man made activities can change the climate in any appreciable fashion. Please convince me that I am wrong. Tell me if there are lifestyles that contribute to climate change.

Human culture and technology has been stunted in the past by “mini ice ages”. This has occurred on and off for the last recordable 800 years. With the exception of stratovarius violins I see nothing good taking place in these cold periods.

As a free thinking individual, I oppose ice ages, if you can convince me that my lifestyle contributes to global warming the I will adjust my wants for the global good. I will walk the earth with a giant carbon footprint, just call me Sasquatch. If forced to drive an electric vehicle I will tow a trailer burning tires. I have so much enjoyed the last 20 years of mild winters and will do my part to see that this continues.

And so my Australian friend, convince me that I can affect the climate and I will. I wish that this were true. So look at the irony, if I am made to believe that I am a factor In this then our lifestyles will cancel each other out. Hopefully you see the humor in this.

Hi Jeff. I'll be brief.

Our planet's climate is complex and interwoven. I don't know if you are a career scientist, but I am. I worked as a weapon systems development scientist, though some of my early studies included biology subjects. It was routine for me to review and assess studies of all manner of military related scientific investigations, covering a lot of territory, without being a subject matter expert across all topics. No one can be. But scientists understand the processes we all use to undertake good research and advance human knowledge. We know that when almost all of the researchers in a particular field (say, climate science) are providing the same advice, there is almost zero chance that they've got it wrong. To ignore this is to be unwise.

It is easy to understand how sensitive our climate is. You mentioned the mini ice-ages. No need for me to provide examples. You're aware of the impact of disruptions, but are you properly considering the consequences of tipping points? The impacts will not be minor. If you're worried about migration now, stand-by! Before then we'll be troubled by food security, fire impacts, or even just insurance costs. Don't buy a house near the coast.

You're right; the lifestyle of a particular individual can't make a difference. To slow anthropogenic climate change will require cooperation by many; billions of individuals, all helping. What I find so disturbingly fascinating is how the American ideals of freedom and individuality so often manifest in the form of selfishness and disregard for the welfare of others who share this beautiful planet. How can burning tyres ever be a sensible thing to do?

All people want freedom but not all of them are selfish. You would lend your neighbour a hose if their house was on fire. We'd see you running in to rescue them. You wouldn't pour petrol on the fire. In this light, how can you be insensitive to peoples' islands being flooded, or whole countries being flooded? The argument, 'There's nothing I can do,' doesn't hold up. Only minor adjustments to your lifestyle would be required to become part of the community that is helping instead of hindering. If you wouldn't pour petrol on your neighbour's house fire, why would you burn tyres? Now extrapolate.

I'm sorry but I don't see humour in your suggestion that we will cancel each other out. Rather, I see one more person who is unable to make the simple connection, 'I'm part of this.'

 

[Jeff505]

Hi gearguy.

You're right, Harris and her executive might not have done a 'better' job, however:

- Harris would not have set up a mafia state, with wholesale sackings of inspectors general, judge advocates general, military chiefs, FBI bureau chiefs, etc, etc, along with intimidation of Congress members, judges, journalists, media organisations, etc;
- Harris would not have set about making enemies of just about every friend America has;
- Harris would not stabbed Ukraine in the back by cutting off intel, at the cost of many lives;
- Harris would not have prepped Russia that it was about to cut off intel for Ukraine;
- Harris would not have extorted Ukraine;
- Harris and her VP would not have conducted themselves like thugs with a visiting President whose country is suffering an aggressive invasion, in a media ambush;
- Harris would not have thrown tariffs around in a tantrum, confusing the crap out of business people and frightening worldwide markets;
- Harris would not have tipped off her mates to buy the dip, as the tariffs are coming straight off again;
- Harris and her partner would not have released meme coins as avenues for bribes a day before inauguration;
- Harris would not have been chaotic in general, with pretty well everything;
- Harris would not lie, knowingly, openly and uncaringly, every time she spoke;
- Harris would not have made it impossible for American tourists to get a coffee or a meal anywhere in Europe (and broadly every where else quite frankly) without a thick layer of ten cooks' and waiters' spit over the top of it.

I have just one request. Are those of you who are Trump supporters so blind as to not be able to see what is happening to the good governance of your country? Trump is copying Putin and is creating a mafia state. He's already done it! Do you really think this is a good development?

I ask these questions as a person who genuinely understands the need for a pivot in the US's attention away from Europe and towards Asia. No issue, in fact as an Australian I welcome it. Harris could easily have accomplished the same, without ruining America's prosperity, reputation, self-respect, civic pride, trade balance and the prospect of a future without civil war. Getting a tax cut is not worth this.

The US voting population has made a decision to reject socialism and big government. The phrase “ The government that governs least, governs best” has been one of the driving factors in Trumps election. I do not agree with the drastic way that this is being implemented but appreciate the direction. It is understandable that this view may be at odds with someone from another country that is a believer in more government control. This is not a point of debate, vote and support policies that you believe are beneficial to your country and I will do the same. Obviously socialism and the hoax of climate change are important to you, I support your right to champion these ideas. My favorite rifle is a Winchester model 70 in 375 H&H, this gun will be accompanying me to Namibia next month. What is the firearm that gives you those warm and fuzzy feelings.

 

[Tubby’s Canteen]

What happened with China?

I assume this is some sort of retort to previous comments I’ve made in regards to potential Chinese investment in future oil projects yet I don’t see it.

If a Canadian leader well use trudeaus name as a place holder although we all know he would never have the fortitude to do it were to completely shut off Canadian oil exports while simultaneously causing blackouts to 1.5 million households in Michigan, Minnesota, and New York and stopping potash with the potential for crop shortages next fall. Trump would most likely consider it an act of aggression and attempt to retaliate with military force. How that would play out is unclear it would depend on how strong of a hold he has on the upper echelons of the military wether or not they would invade an allied nation that has not taken military action against the U.S. @Red Leg would have a better perspective on that.

Worst case scenario

Militarily the U.S. runs over Canada securing vital sectors Alberta oil potash in Saskatchewan major hydro electric damns in Quebec and Labrador. The rest of the world turns on America as a trading partner and ally. Most likely china makes large territorial gains in the pacific while that is going on. The only small consolation I can see is Russia is currently a spent force so mainland Europe might remain relatively unscathed depending if they bother to come to our aid or not.

 

[mdwest]

I think something pertinant here to consider is... after 2668 pages.. we're literally still talking about the same thing that started this thread 8 years ago... US/Canadian economic relations....

Several Canadians were very upset in 2018 over these same discussions.. and if you read what was being said then, much of the same rhetoric from both sides is almost identical to what it was 8 years ago..

Whats changed is Trump made the same threats last time, and everyone got offended.. but no one really thought he was going to follow through.. vs today, he's making threats, everyone is getting offended... and everyone is convinced he is going to do what he's been saying he was going to do literally since the first couple of months he was in office the first time (going to tariff our neighbors... but is willing to not do that if our neighbors drop their tariffs... going to drop out of NATO if NATO doesn't start carrying its share of the load, etc..etc..)

The only thing "new" that we're talking about is Ukraine.. and that's because Ukraine happened during the period that Trump wasn't in office..

Theres truly almost nothing at all new here... Both the US and our friends have had 8 years to prepare for this... and neither clearly have..

 

[YancyW]

I assume this is some sort of retort to previous comments I’ve made in regards to potential Chinese investment in future oil projects yet I don’t see it.

If a Canadian leader well use trudeaus name as a place holder although we all know he would never have the fortitude to do it were to completely shut off Canadian oil exports while simultaneously causing blackouts to 1.5 million households in Michigan, Minnesota, and New York and stopping potash with the potential for crop shortages next fall. Trump would most likely consider it an act of aggression and attempt to retaliate with military force. How that would play out is unclear it would depend on how strong of a hold he has on the upper echelons of the military wether or not they would invade an allied nation that has not taken military action against the U.S. @Red Leg would have a better perspective on that.

Worst case scenario

Militarily the U.S. runs over Canada securing vital sectors Alberta oil potash in Saskatchewan major hydro electric damns in Quebec and Labrador. The rest of the world turns on America as a trading partner and ally. Most likely china makes large territorial gains in the pacific while that is going on. The only small consolation I can see is Russia is currently a spent force so mainland Europe might remain relatively unscathed depending if they bother to come to our aid or not.

Oh come on, I enjoy these conversations, but the idea the US is going take military action against Canada is looney bin bullshit. Zero chance of that happen, same chance as Canada cutting off oil, gas and electricity.

 

[Tubby’s Canteen]

Oh come on, I enjoy these conversations, but the idea the US is going take military action against Canada is looney bin bullshit. Zero chance of that happen, same chance as Canada cutting off oil, gas and electricity.

I never once said it was going to happen if you look back @WAB and I were discussing the fact that a Canadian politician felt comfortable voicing the threat at all. As WAB said in a previous post it would be almost impossible for a Canadian leader to stop potash let alone oil.

 

[Certus]

Like I said earlier in my response to @Tanks. It’s absolutely shocking the amount of people that are MAGA yet receive some sort of government support. Being from small town Oklahoma you’re likely to see someone entering an Indian casino wearing a MAGA hat, I think that speaks volumes.

Woo Okie! Wife’s from Enid.

 

[Certus]

I think something pertinant here to consider is... after 2668 pages.. we're literally still talking about the same thing that started this thread 8 years ago... US/Canadian economic relations....

Several Canadians were very upset in 2018 over these same discussions.. and if you read what was being said then, much of the same rhetoric from both sides is almost identical to what it was 8 years ago..

Whats changed is Trump made the same threats last time, and everyone got offended.. but no one really thought he was going to follow through.. vs today, he's making threats, everyone is getting offended... and everyone is convinced he is going to do what he's been saying he was going to do literally since the first couple of months he was in office the first time (going to tariff our neighbors... but is willing to not do that if our neighbors drop their tariffs... going to drop out of NATO if NATO doesn't start carrying its share of the load, etc..etc..)

The only thing "new" that we're talking about is Ukraine.. and that's because Ukraine happened during the period that Trump wasn't in office..

Theres truly almost nothing at all new here... Both the US and our friends have had 8 years to prepare for this... and neither clearly have..

Still got back to the point quicker than my coworker telling a story, she could talk for hours before finishing point.

 

[Scott CWO]

Hi Jeff. I'll be brief.

Our planet's climate is complex and interwoven. I don't know if you are a career scientist, but I am. I worked as a weapon systems development scientist, though some of my early studies included biology subjects. It was routine for me to review and assess studies of all manner of military related scientific investigations, covering a lot of territory, without being a subject matter expert across all topics. No one can be. But scientists understand the processes we all use to undertake good research and advance human knowledge. We know that when almost all of the researchers in a particular field (say, climate science) are providing the same advice, there is almost zero chance that they've got it wrong. To ignore this is to be unwise.

It is easy to understand how sensitive our climate is. You mentioned the mini ice-ages. No need for me to provide examples. You're aware of the impact of disruptions, but are you properly considering the consequences of tipping points? The impacts will not be minor. If you're worried about migration now, stand-by! Before then we'll be troubled by food security, fire impacts, or even just insurance costs. Don't buy a house near the coast.

You're right; the lifestyle of a particular individual can't make a difference. To slow anthropogenic climate change will require cooperation by many; billions of individuals, all helping. What I find so disturbingly fascinating is how the American ideals of freedom and individuality so often manifest in the form of selfishness and disregard for the welfare of others who share this beautiful planet. How can burning tyres ever be a sensible thing to do?

All people want freedom but not all of them are selfish. You would lend your neighbour a hose if their house was on fire. We'd see you running in to rescue them. You wouldn't pour petrol on the fire. In this light, how can you be insensitive to peoples' islands being flooded, or whole countries being flooded? The argument, 'There's nothing I can do,' doesn't hold up. Only minor adjustments to your lifestyle would be required to become part of the community that is helping instead of hindering. If you wouldn't pour petrol on your neighbour's house fire, why would you burn tyres? Now extrapolate.

I'm sorry but I don't see humour in your suggestion that we will cancel each other out. Rather, I see one more person who is unable to make the simple connection, 'I'm part of this.'

Have you ever even been to Africa or other third world or developing places? Please list them. If you have, then you should know that the US is much cleaner and spewing far less CO2. I have been to Tajikistan, the CAR, Cameroon, Senegal, Botswana, Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Ethiopia and South Africa. Some of those more than once. We could go to zero CO2 emissions and it wouldn’t matter compared to most other countries outside of Europe and the US. Why do you think African sunsets are so beautiful to photograph? It’s because the whole continent is on fire in the remote areas. Billions of acres of grass are burned and the skies are full of smoke all the way to the dirty cities. The major roadways are full of smoke-spewing vehicles and trucks like you’ve never seen. It can be difficult to breathe on these roads. Ever been to China? I have traveled throughout China. Incredible pollution there. I landed in Beijing one time and couldn’t see the terminal from the parked plane!

The vast majority of people in the above countries are just trying to survive the day. They will NEVER give a damn about climate change! Their governments can’t even provide basic services! Meanwhile, your ilk are trying to bankrupt the US and Europe with over-reaching ridiculous climate policies that will not make a dent. Wake up to the reality and give up your guilt complex you were taught.

 

[mark-hunter]

The vast majority of people in the above countries are just trying to survive the day. They will NEVER give a damn about climate change! Their governments can’t even provide basic services!

I confirm this. You defined the problem in two sentences!
I have been to more then 60 countries of the world.
Many third world countries, first impressions:
I dont know about CO2 emmitions (or how to measure CO2 myself), but I have seen plastic everywhere. On canals, on road sides, in rivers, in suburbs, and in town centers. Plastic, plastic, plastic.... bottles, bags, packs... everywhere. Cans, soft drinks.
The pollution is wide spread. Big rivers stink

Waste segregation, landfills, recycling? Forget about.

 

[MauserM03Blog]

The US voting population has made a decision to reject socialism and big government. The phrase “ The government that governs least, governs best” has been one of the driving factors in Trumps election. I do not agree with the drastic way that this is being implemented but appreciate the direction. It is understandable that this view may be at odds with someone from another country that is a believer in more government control. This is not a point of debate, vote and support policies that you believe are beneficial to your country and I will do the same. Obviously socialism and the hoax of climate change are important to you, I support your right to champion these ideas. My favorite rifle is a Winchester model 70 in 375 H&H, this gun will be accompanying me to Namibia next month. What is the firearm that gives you those warm and fuzzy feelings.

Hi Jeff. I have no problem with the American electorate choosing policies that suit them. I agree with many. My concern is with the effects beyond your borders, exacerbated by the destruction of good governance in the interests of eliminating opposition. Opposition is healthy for democracies.

I spend time here for exactly the reason you've highlighted. We all have something in common that we care about quite deeply. We care about doing a good job when we take the life of a big animal. We care about using quality equipment, to help do this job well. It seems incongruous to care in this respect, but not in others.

Climate change is not a hoax. It's bizarre to see a large number of people deciding that it is, because it suits them. It doesn't work this way. We don't get to decide that something isn't happening, when clearly it is.

My favourite rifle is a Mauser M98 Magnum in 375 H&H. The balance, lines and technical features of this rifle are perfect to my eyes.