@Red Leg you've conflated these topics a few times.
Three things being discussed, you blend them together as a strawman or ad hominem whether accidentally or intentionally.
1.) We talked about drones known as UAPs that defy physics. I cited the government's reports and the government clearing house on that topic. Most of the credible reports are multiple corroborations of the same event. Pilots visually, their instrumentation, and ground/naval instrumentation. Those defy the laws of physics according to the reports and video going above and below water and speeds and maneuvers that have not been explained to the general public.
2.) We talked about meatheads using civilian drones in closed airspace. Terror? A-holes?
3.) We discussed the November madness on the east coast where numerous photos and videos showed government quality drones the size of automobiles flying around New Jersey and Pennsylvania. My comments above were about point (3) herein. The amount of Federal, State, and Local government work spent trying to identify these was exhaustive. Months of speculation occurred. Sitting members of congress were suggesting they were foreign powers launching them off the coast. The Feds were saying nothing constructive other than we'll look into it. But now, as of two days ago Trump issues a statement that they were authorized flights known to the FAA and other Federal agencies? If it wasn't something nefarious, wouldn't a simple phone call from the operators to the FAA have cleared the mystery immediately, rather than requiring a damned press release from the sitting US President 75 days later? What mission do automobile sized drones need to fulfill every night over the Eastern seaboard over citizens homes, outside of US bases?
Point 3 is the topic. Lets not warp the conversation by mixing point 1 as they are unrelated technologies, locations, and observations.
