I don’t see natural resource depletion becoming an issue. That theory was proposed years before my time. It never happened. Perhaps water will be an issue when the sun expands and boils the oceans. That will not be my concern.It's not so much a population issue, as it is depleting natural resources, overcrowding, and the availability of the goods that we have today.
Something that, may, or, may not happen? It will be long after my demise.
Tanks, why do you have to harp on my belt!?!It is interesting that people will wear fancy watches and suits and pair it with a frayed belt.
View attachment 640981
Stop looking at this thread. Just a suggestion.Why is there a political discussion here? I visit sights like this to escape politics, not wallow in them.
Most of those had been here for decades. My housekeeper has been working for me since 1994, she and her family were some of those people. Her sister and BIL own a very successful machine shop. She owns her home and drove a nicer car than I did until recently. Her daughter is a dental hygienist and son is an attorney. These are much more productive members of society than hell of a lot of native-born citizens that live on various government subsidies.
Reagan was also duped by the democrats in congress, he agreed to the amnesty in exchange for clamping down on the border. The dems reneged.Most of those had been here for decades. My housekeeper has been working for me since 1994, she and her family were some of those people. Her sister and BIL own a very successful machine shop. She owns her home and drove a nicer car than I did until recently. Her daughter is a dental hygienist and son is an attorney. These are much more productive members of society than hell of a lot of native-born citizens that live on various government subsidies.
He is in fact a really good guy - friends and colleagues for 25 years. That is his personal bird and he flew it down there just a month after having both hips replaced. Ridiculous in this country that a 73 year old aviator is flying in supplies and “hoping” to get enough in before the real cold arrives.A good guy post. One of the tens of thousands who are helping.
I agree that businesses have no choice, but I think this argument ignores one point.
A person has two 'jobs' in an economy. Creating 'stuff', and consuming 'stuff'. Basic supply and demand. It doesn't matter how cheap or high quality a good or service is if there isn't a customer base with the interest and resources to take advantage of it.
Automation essentially focuses on removing people from the 'creating stuff' process. Remove people, add machines.
But, machines don't fulfill the other essential part of the equation. Machines don't 'consume stuff'.
It also seems to ignore the other key point, that if people can't 'create stuff', they may want to consume 'stuff', but no longer have the resources (wages) required to do so. At that point, they can demand whatever quality at whatever price they like, but they can't afford those goods, so they're no longer part of the economic system.
In the context of a single business, a single sector even, this is fine. Cheaper goods for everyone, not so much job loss that the overall customer base is hurt to any great degree and hey, maybe making it cheaper opens up a new (poorer) consumer base, like happened with the car, or air travel, or personal computers, or clothes, or fancy foods. Knock a dollar off COGS in exchange for losing 10,000 potential consumers (the employees you laid off to achieve the saving) and you're way, way in the black as a large company. Hence why it is in the interest of the consumer and the shareholders for a single business, planning independently, to take advantage of automation to as great a degree as possible.
But if it's across every company, or a lot of companies in a lot of industries to the point that the customer base IS significantly reduced, you have a problem. Knocking a dollar off COGS in exchange for losing 10 MILLION consumers who no longer have an income to buy your stuff, and your benefits are marginal. If it's 100 MILLION consumers in that position, you go bankrupt.
If (as I believe), we are in a period of job destruction through automation (at least in the West), not an era of job creation through automation, then the 'consuming stuff' element of the economy becomes increasingly important, and increasingly problematic. Effectively, the value of an individual in economic terms is increasingly weighted to their potential as a consumer, not a worker.
Something will need to be done about it. This might be simply producing 'stuff' efficiently to sell overseas at a price that opens up that market in exchange for a reduced living standards domestically. It might be producing 'stuff' cheaply enough that government support alone enables its purchase. We could simply let wages plummet as the availability of jobs drops and hope that goods drop in price quickly enough to approximate the same living standards in the US (whilst the 3rd world enjoys the actual benefits in increased living standards). Or we could directly recognize (financially) the essential value of 'the consumer' to economic success through the introduction of a universal basic income. All are options, and the one selected will depend on policy. But something will need to be done.
I don't have any good answers here, and those that I can think of fly in the face of a lot of my own opinions on free market economics. I think this is a difficult conundrum. But to simply ignore that fundamental issue is not a solution.
We are destroying mostly low skilled jobs and also some jobs that could never have been done by humans (silicone wafers etc.), obviously a computer chip with billions of transistors could never be done by a human (Apple's M1 chip has 114B). Automation allows us to improve technology.If (as I believe), we are in a period of job destruction through automation (at least in the West), not an era of job creation through automation, then the 'consuming stuff' element of the economy becomes increasingly important, and increasingly problematic. Effectively, the value of an individual in economic terms is increasingly weighted to their potential as a consumer, not a worker.
I think it could potentially give the Israeli government a way out if they want to. They can claim it as a victory along with the destruction of a great deal of Hamas’ capability.With Sinwar's elimination there is an opportunity to bring an end to the war in Gaza. What I find hard to believe is that he was casually wandering around without his shield of hostages, to be chanced upon by an Israeli patrol. Makes no sense. It wouldn't surprise me if his own gave him up for a reward, or just to get him out of the way so they can negotiate.
If Israel does declare victory and suspended the war, what will happen to the remaining hostages? Provided any are still alive.I think it could potentially give the Israeli government a way out if they want to. They can claim it as a victory along with the destruction of a great deal of Hamas’ capability.
Might depend on internal Israeli politics though. I’ve heard that Netanyahu likes the war as it keeps him off the hot seat for a number of internal controversies as well as the intelligence failure resulting in Hamas’ October 7th success.
I imagine it would be part of negotiations. It’s speculation on my part.If Israel does declare victory and suspended the war, what will happen to the remaining hostages? Provided any are still alive.
I think Hamas has refused to negotiate up to now, maybe they will be willing to come to the table now that the top 3 leaders are at room temperature.I imagine it would be part of negotiations. It’s speculation on my part.
I don’t think Israel has been overly enthusiastic about negotiation either but combat can’t go on forever for either side. At some point it will have to go back to the simmering pot it was before. Israel can’t exterminate Hamas completely and Hamas can’t stand up to Israeli force directly.I think Hamas has refused to negotiate up to now, maybe they will be willing to come to the table now that the top 3 leaders are at room temperature.
Ridiculous in this country that a 73 year old aviator is flying in supplies and “hoping” to get enough in before the real cold arrives.
We got pretty lucky during that. A new construction house (built in summer of 2020) on 6" studs and R19. We got down to 47 or 48 in our house. *Everybody* was wearing my hunting gear. Thankfully I have quite a lot of it.AMEN TO THAT!
@Red Leg
Remember the "Big Freeze" back in February 2021
The Great Texas Freeze: February 11-20, 2021
On February 11-20, 2021, a historical winter event occurred across the state of Texas that set many records, including being the first billion-dollar weather disaster of that year.www.ncei.noaa.gov
It was 9F in my living room for a week
View attachment 641025
They were literally flying bottled water into Austin with C17s because of all the frozen water pipes; although this was overkill and for optics, I thought it was a great display of what our nation can do when it wants to.
Then again Austin is fully Democrat and the situation was on the national news non stop.
Yup big issues ahead with this....same thing going on with the massive dam Ethiopia has built on the nile ....countries down river not happy especially Egypt.....
Why is Egypt worried about Ethiopia's dam on the Nile?
Egypt is concerned that Ethiopia is using water from the Nile to fill its giant Renaissance dam.www.bbc.com