Source?
Source?
This is an interesting chart but how did they come up with the numbers and how did they verify them? I’m with you @redleg, what’s the source?Source?
Could be I suppose. There has been a lot of that sort of "analysis' floating around for a while. Lindell fell for some of it.This is an interesting chart but how did they come up with the numbers and how did they verify them? I’m with you @redleg, what’s the source?
That is truly funny.
Probably QAnan..Source?
Maybe, however New York is third state after CA and TX contributing most to US economy and keeping states like MS, AL, WV, LA afloat.Judge Engoron, is judicial scum. Many more of his ilk sit on benches across this country.
Political hitmen for the radical left.
New York is nothing but a wart on the ass of this country.
Apparently a massive phone outage is occurring now. AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile all impacted, according to news reports. Text still works. Wondering if this is a cyber attack. Get the foil hats ready!
![]()
Cellphone outage hits AT&T customers nationwide; Verizon and T-Mobile users also affected
AT&T has yet to say anything about a reported service outage impacting tens of thousands of customers nationwide Thursday morning.www.foxbusiness.com
Economics has nothing to do with my remarkMaybe, however New York is third state after CA and TX contributing most to US economy and keeping states like MS, AL, WV, LA afloat.
Looks like this was posted in Saidit which is both a news aggradation site with community chat much Reddit? It seems to offer no supporting evidence or methodology there as well. One comment by mrwizzard did say "it is all legit, i can vouch for the chart" so it must be true?
I get it but money is everything in the age we live in.Economics has nothing to do with my remark
Looks like this was posted in Saidit which is both a news aggradation site with community chat much Reddit? It seems to offer no supporting evidence or methodology there as well. One comment by mrwizzard did say "it is all legit, i can vouch for the chart" so it must be true?
It is quite possible, even likely, this is not the original source of the material, so perhaps there is supporting commentary elsewhere. There is apparently a three-year old source link in comments, but it is no longer functional. Nor is the link for the original post on a site called media.thedonald.win seemingly working.If that date is correct it makes the detail of the analysis even more remarkable.
I have no doubt there were voting irregularities in the 20 election. It is hardly a new phenomena in American politics. What I see no evidence of is some sort of national conspiracy to flip the election for Biden. Did the democrats take advantage of the whole COVID mail-in ballot opportunity with ground game? You bet they did. Where those rules are still in place, they will be prepared to do so again, and I see little evidence that the republican party is any more ready to counter that with their own effort this year than they were in '20.
Part of my job the past 30 years has been dealing with conspiracies, malfeasance, and collusion.
The falacy Americans operate under is the notion that most things are conspiracies of a sort like this: a star chamber, a smoke filled room of three piece suit wearing globalists, everyone votes like a scene from the Godfather, and they move forward with their plot. Life rarely works like that.
What does happen is natural forces, independent actors pushing for their own self interests without central organization.
There is no need for a central figure to preside over a conspiracy to screw up an election. Grassroots ballot harvesters. Self-interested criminals illegally voting. Illegals voting for more gimmies. One-party rule election officials choosing to prefer policies that benefit their party. Activist judges ruling in favor of counting rules or eligibility of late-entry ballots. Individuals voting twice. Individuals voting out of district where their vote matters more.
Conspiracies to break the system require no central coordination or cooperation amongst parties.
I have to agree with @rookhawk in this.
Any military needs good order and discipline to be effective. That with centralized command and control are keys to success!
A resistance needs only motive and local leaders to cause trouble for an establishment or opposing military force. If no one is in charge, there is no one to blame.
The novel Rifleman Dodd by C.S. Forester is a fictional accounting of what one barely literate professional soldier could do to instigate trouble for the enemy. In the end no one gave him any credit for his actions but he was happy to rejoin his unit.
I think there were and still are a whole bunch of anti-Trumpers, anti-conservative, ANTIFA and so on ready to cause whatever interference they can get away with!
No argument with any of that Rook - well maybe the corporate bribery thing. But it works exactly the same on both sides of the aisle. Charts similar to the one posted were everywhere following the 20 election because Trump couldn't have possibly lost.Part of my job the past 30 years has been dealing with conspiracies, malfeasance, and collusion.
The falacy Americans operate under is the notion that most things are conspiracies of a sort like this: a star chamber, a smoke filled room of three piece suit wearing globalists, everyone votes like a scene from the Godfather, and they move forward with their plot. Life rarely works like that.
What does happen is natural forces, independent actors pushing for their own self interests without central organization.
There is no need for a central figure to preside over a conspiracy to screw up an election. Grassroots ballot harvesters. Self-interested criminals illegally voting. Illegals voting for more gimmies. One-party rule election officials choosing to prefer policies that benefit their party. Activist judges ruling in favor of counting rules or eligibility of late-entry ballots. Individuals voting twice. Individuals voting out of district where their vote matters more.
As evidenced by median IQ, net worth, and incarceration rates, one party in America is more inclined to follow rules and lose cleanly, the other party is more inclined to be of "end justifies the means" ilk.
Conspiracies to break the system require no central coordination or cooperation amongst parties.
No argument there in regard to morals. It becomes murky on deciding whose Christian morals as it is not absolute, otherwise there would not be a huge divide in the country regarding reproductive care.So who draws the line and on what basis is the line drawn? The line was drawn in this country by our founding fathers. You can like it or dislike it, but you can’t change it, or the fact that the underlying principles are Christian morals.