Politics

Yea if I can get personal, I'm not planning to become a father once I get older. I'm a naturally high stress and anxiety person and while I'm decent with small children, the stress of parenthood would literally kill me. However, the last thing I want is for America to have the same problem as Japan.

Good that you recognize your weaknesses, but I can tell you from personal experience that the anxiety can be overcome, and buried in a deep hole to never see the light of day again.

Being a Daddy is certainly stressful at times, but if you do your job, the payoff for it is more reward than anything you can possibly imagine. I'm sure nearly every Daddy on this forum can back me up on this. You really cannot imagine the abundance of joy your own children can bring you. Nothing can prepare you for those highs.
 
Good that you recognize your weaknesses, but I can tell you from personal experience that the anxiety can be overcome, and buried in a deep hole to never see the light of day again.

Being a Daddy is certainly stressful at times, but if you do your job, the payoff for it is more reward than anything you can possibly imagine. I'm sure nearly every Daddy on this forum can back me up on this. You really cannot imagine the abundance of joy your own children can bring you. Nothing can prepare you for those highs.

Yep, and then one magical day you become papa or grandpa. Suddenly there is a little bundle of joy who is quite convinced that you can do no wrong!
 
signal-2020-03-13-102814.jpeg


Yessir, just turned a year old in January, already in 3T clothes. I got him that t-shirt for his birthday - says "Straight outta Timeout!"
 
View attachment 335696

Yessir, just turned a year old in January, already in 3T clothes. I got him that t-shirt for his birthday - says "Straight outta Timeout!"

Awesome! My granddaughter just announced that mommy and daddy don’t think toots are funny... but papa does! [emoji41]
 
Well Joe Biden just did a online townhall, and not only does it appears he cant speak unscripted, but his team doesnt understand basic technology. What should is a but more concerning is he is directly asked about sport hunted trophy imports and his answer though rambling and confusing climate change and endanger species act, he does say he will stop imports and apply international pressure to do so.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/03/14/nolte-joe-biden-forgets-year-meanders-off-frame-in-disastrous-livestream/ ...about 2/3rds down is the full live stream, fast forward to minute 35:30. Dont try to watch the rest it is painful.

Interesting with everything going on, this is even a topic. But make no mistake, they are going to do everything they can to make it painful as possible to bring animals back.
 
The real issue with the Biden candidacy is: who will be the Vice President. If he were to win the election the next thing to check would be the line in Las Vegas for the number of days after inauguration before the Vice Pres became Pres.
 
Canada Ratifies USMCA Trade Agreement…

Canada completes the North American cycle with their ratification of the USMCA to replace NAFTA. Mexico and the U.S. ratified the new trade agreement last year and January respectively. The Canadian parliament did so yesterday.



CANADA – Canada on Friday formally approved the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), taking the last legislative step to implementation of the deal to replace the 25-year-old North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

The trade deal, ratified by the Mexican legislature last June and by Congress in January, was formally ratified by the Canadian Senate Friday, and shortly thereafter received royal assent, the Canadian governor general’s approval.

The deal was passed through the legislature before Parliament shut down for five weeks in response to the coronavirus pandemic.





Washington, DC – United States Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer today commented on the Canadian Parliament’s approval of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA):

“Now that the USMCA has been approved by all three countries, an historic new chapter for North American trade has begun. This landmark achievement would not be possible without President Trump’s leadership and determination to strengthen our economy, and the hard work of our negotiating partners in Canada and Mexico. USMCA is the gold standard by which all future trade agreements will be judged, and citizens of all three countries will benefit for years to come.”

Background:

USMCA was signed into law by President Donald J. Trump on January 29, 2020, after it received overwhelming bipartisan support in Congress. The President was elected on replacing NAFTA with an agreement that puts American workers, farmers, ranchers and businesses first. He achieved this goal with the USMCA, an agreement that will bring manufacturing jobs back, help service industry workers, and raise wages.

All three countries are working together closely on implementation in advance of the Agreement’s entry into force. (link)
 

Attachments

  • robert-lighthizer-in-mexico.jpg
    robert-lighthizer-in-mexico.jpg
    93.5 KB · Views: 92
  • usmca-signing-freeland-seade-and-lighthizer.jpg
    usmca-signing-freeland-seade-and-lighthizer.jpg
    40.1 KB · Views: 98
FB_IMG_1523578178432.jpg
 
Seriously! How many on AH really believe in the mainstream media so called experts and all these percentages and numbers being toss about?

I'll say in again because of all the media hysteria and numbers and percentages being tossed about by all these so called experts doesn't mean squat!!!

All these numbers and percentages are bogus!!

i.e. Globally. 1 billion people have been infected by CV19 around the globe. Yet only 1 million people have been reported having CV19. Of the 1 million:

100 thousand are 0-5 years old:
100 thousand are 6-10 years old:
100 thousand are 11-15 years old
100 thousand are 16-20 years old:
100 thousand are 21-25 years old:
100 thousand are 26-30 years old:
100 thousand are 31-35 years old:
100 thousand are 36- 40 years old:
100 thousand are 41-50 years old:
100 thousand are 51-55 years old:
100 thousand are 56-60 years old:
100 thousand are 61-65 years old:
100 thousand are 66-70 years old:
100 thousand are 71-75 years old:
100 thousand are 76-80 years old:
100 thousand are 81-85 years old:
100 thousand are 85-90 years old:
100 thousand are over 90 years old:

Of the 100's of thousands listed by age group above only 100 million reported/ were "diagnosed", with CV19.

The other 800 thousand never reported being sick.

Hypothetically:

10 out of each age group: 0-5, 6-10, 11-15, 16-20, died from CV19.

5 out of each age group: 21-25, 26-30, 31-35, 36-40, 41-45, 46-50, died from CV19.

100 out of each age group 51 and over, of which 60,000 per age group has existing respiratory problems dies, and is blamed on CV19. Rather than 30,000 per remaining age group actually died of natural/other causes.

Hopefully, I don't have to continue the math and everyone gets the gest of what my conclusion is leading to!

Quit, listening to these bogus numbers, by supposed "media experts".

Until, which will never happen, every case of CV19 has been confirmed! Accurate numbers and percentages can not be determined!

When so called experts talk numbers, percentages, and graphs, turn the FREAKING CHANNEL!!!! ITS BOGUS INFORMATION!!! and nothing more than fear factor!!!

The higher the numbers the more accurate. The lesser numbers the more inflated and inaccurate the percentages!

So PLEASE STOP! quoting numbers and percentages, age groups, most likely to/not, etc.

As far as CV19,as serious it is or may be, ASK yourselves, with the CV19 distraction, what is really going on in the (US political field)? What is the (US) government covering up, avoiding/keeping from the Anerican people? (especially the Demcommie Nazis Socialist Party)!!..
 
China death rates through February 11:
Ages 10-29 = .2%
30-39 = .2%
40-49 = .4%
50-59 = 1.3%
60-69 = 3.6%
70-79 = 8%
80+ = 14.8%

Death rate for people without any pre-existing health problems was less than 1%. Which in turn means that 99% of deaths were people with pre-existing health problems. We are going to ruin our economy for this?

Contact your politicians.
 
China death rates through February 11:
Ages 10-29 = .2%
30-39 = .2%
40-49 = .4%
50-59 = 1.3%
60-69 = 3.6%
70-79 = 8%
80+ = 14.8%

Death rate for people without any pre-existing health problems was less than 1%. Which in turn means that 99% of deaths were people with pre-existing health problems. We are going to ruin our economy for this?

Contact your politicians.


How accurate are these numbers and should "we" (anyone) trust any government's numbers?

Especially a communist closed societies numbers?!.

Bogus Chinese numbers unless proven 100% accurate!

What is the validity for the 1%?

Mainstream media and their so called "experts", have created a panic, along with social media BS!

Governments are going into react phase to quell the chaos mainstream media caused!

Today's mainstream media should not be trusted! as being accurate, trusted news source! Mainstream media WILL: like, deny, conjure, manipulate, distort, do what ever it takes to make/sell
news!!!
 
Last edited:
Seriously! How many on AH really believe in the mainstream media so called experts and all these percentages and numbers being toss about?

I'll say in again because of all the media hysteria and numbers and percentages being tossed about by all these so called experts doesn't mean squat!!!

All these numbers and percentages are bogus!!

i.e. Globally. 1 billion people have been infected by CV19 around the globe. Yet only 1 million people have been reported having CV19. Of the 1 million:

100 thousand are 0-5 years old:
100 thousand are 6-10 years old:
100 thousand are 11-15 years old
100 thousand are 16-20 years old:
100 thousand are 21-25 years old:
100 thousand are 26-30 years old:
100 thousand are 31-35 years old:
100 thousand are 36- 40 years old:
100 thousand are 41-50 years old:
100 thousand are 51-55 years old:
100 thousand are 56-60 years old:
100 thousand are 61-65 years old:
100 thousand are 66-70 years old:
100 thousand are 71-75 years old:
100 thousand are 76-80 years old:
100 thousand are 81-85 years old:
100 thousand are 85-90 years old:
100 thousand are over 90 years old:

Of the 100's of thousands listed by age group above only 100 million reported/ were "diagnosed", with CV19.

The other 800 thousand never reported being sick.

Hypothetically:

10 out of each age group: 0-5, 6-10, 11-15, 16-20, died from CV19.

5 out of each age group: 21-25, 26-30, 31-35, 36-40, 41-45, 46-50, died from CV19.

100 out of each age group 51 and over, of which 60,000 per age group has existing respiratory problems dies, and is blamed on CV19. Rather than 30,000 per remaining age group actually died of natural/other causes.

Hopefully, I don't have to continue the math and everyone gets the gest of what my conclusion is leading to!

Quit, listening to these bogus numbers, by supposed "media experts".

Until, which will never happen, every case of CV19 has been confirmed! Accurate numbers and percentages can not be determined!

When so called experts talk numbers, percentages, and graphs, turn the FREAKING CHANNEL!!!! ITS BOGUS INFORMATION!!! and nothing more than fear factor!!!

The higher the numbers the more accurate. The lesser numbers the more inflated and inaccurate the percentages!

So PLEASE STOP! quoting numbers and percentages, age groups, most likely to/not, etc.

As far as CV19,as serious it is or may be, ASK yourselves, with the CV19 distraction, what is really going on in the (US political field)? What is the (US) government covering up, avoiding/keeping from the Anerican people? (especially the Demcommie Nazis Socialist Party)!!..
OK so if that's the case where are you getting your enlightened numbers from? LOL. BTW nowhere close to all cases each year of the flu are reported either. Talk about a number that would be drastically altered. You really think Italy is faking all the dead stacked up in their mourges right now. The curse of modern America is that the majority of the population is at polar extremes. One side is panicky and thinks the world is always about to end, the other is like you and think everything is fake and there is nothing going on and you aren't going to change your life for anything or anyone. We have a severe lack of middle ground. There are thousands of people suddenly dead in the span of a couple months and that factual number is exponentially increasing every day at this point. Not terribly here yet, but that's simply because we are both behind the time line and some people are being sensible and following guidelines.
 
Politics - You are not going to have a unanimous vote anytime soon.

China blaming American Military and the shot back with the China Flu.
Gives people a focus for their fear and anger. Didn't change a thing.

The most of the rest of the world including South Africa, where many of us were schedule and are scheduled to travel to hunt, has banned AMERICANS from entry. They have also banned CHINESE from entry.

Now we all get to wait and watch as the sad social/medical experiment runs it's course around the world.

When any particular argument is proven wrong in the coming times is anyone going to admit they were wrong? If they are politicians they will scapegoat something or someone else and deny the information, etc. etc. eg. "It was the American Army" :rolleyes:

I sincerely hope that fewer people get it than projected. Fewer people become ill and everyone recovers.

Until then, everyone please stay healthy.
I'm off to bed.
 
Last edited:
Politics - You are not going to have a unanimous vote anytime soon.
Mine was carefully worded to exclude politics and still referencing the reality of what we are facing with this virus.....
but ok, if you think it belongs here.... as I said you are the man in charge for a reason so I'm not going to argue it
 
The residual effects will be much longer lasting than the disease. the disease will run its course and vaccines and antibodies will be invented to deal with it. However if the people infected and in need of hospital treatment exceed the facilities, decisions on how the medical resources will be allocated will be made. What will the criteria for those decisions be as to when there is only one bed and two patients? one vial of vaccine and two patients? I don't know that I want a bunch of people willing to kill a baby because it's too young to have his/her name on a birth certificate to be deciding those issues.

But then, you're back to the ship that capsized and sunk. there are a hundred survivors in shark infested water and one life boat. the boat is designed to hold 12 people. If 30 people get in the boat the sides will be pushed below the water line and it will sink. If 29 people are in the boat and a small wave hits the boat it will sink. given the rough seas any amount over 25 is risking having a large wave hit the boat and sink it. So how many of the 100 are allowed into the boat? what is the criteria for those that are allowed in the boat versus what prevents them from being allowed into the boat? Substitute infected people for survivors and the amount of medical facilities for boat capacity and yu have the same question facing doctors now as the virus works its way through various communities.
 
OK so if that's the case where are you getting your enlightened numbers from? LOL. BTW nowhere close to all cases each year of the flu are reported either. Talk about a number that would be drastically altered. You really think Italy is faking all the dead stacked up in their mourges right now. The curse of modern America is that the majority of the population is at polar extremes. One side is panicky and thinks the world is always about to end, the other is like you and think everything is fake and there is nothing going on and you aren't going to change your life for anything or anyone. We have a severe lack of middle ground. There are thousands of people suddenly dead in the span of a couple months and that factual number is exponentially increasing every day at this point. Not terribly here yet, but that's simply because we are both behind the time line and some people are being sensible and following guidelines.


You are missing my point.

Is CV19 serious? Yes.

Should there be panic over CV19? No.

Are people dieing? Yes.

Is Cv19 the cause or multiplier as a cause of mass deaths? Don't know. Inconclusive data.

I'm at neither extreme. I prefer common sense middle.

i.e. You live in a central midwest town USA. Population 100. 25 people are under 15 years old, 25 people are between 15 and 40 years old, 25 people are between 41 and 60 years old, and 25 people are over 61 years old.

24 cases of CV19 infects your town.
News media instantly declares your town as a hot zone and ground zero for your area, and your state has no other cases of CV19, yet according to the media's numbers 25% of your state is infected and ground zero for your state.

Of the 24 cases 10 people die. That's less than 2/5ths. 2 children 15 and under: 1 developed pneumonia after contracting CV19, the other was already battling premature birth disorders after contracting CV19.

2 young adults: 1 athletic the other overweight and diabetic. The athlete survives, the diabetic dies.

4 adults over 50: 1 survives 3 die: 2 are over 80 near death since 6 months ago, 1 contracted CV19 24 hrs prior to death, the other negetive for CV19. 1 dies due to emphysema factory work related, contracted CV19 3 hours before death at age 60.

4 adults ages 20 to 40, good health, 1 dies from bronchial pneumonia 50/50 chance from CV19. The other 3: 1 common cold, 1 common flu, 1 seasonal bronchitis, all 3 developed fluid in the lungs, and treatment had no effects.

Suddenly, Breaking News, 25 %(+) children in your state under 15 years old will contract CV19, state population 15 and under 20,000. That means 5000 will be infected, 200 will die from CV19, 100 because of preexisting conditons.

The countries total population is 20 million under 15 years old. 500,000 under 15 years old will be infected, 20,000 will die, but only 10,000 due to preexisting conditions.

Your little town of 2000 people, just condemned, via the mainstream media, 20,000 kids under 15, but hey 10,000 already had preexisting conditions.

Now multiply that by 10, 100,1000 to represent an entire country. Then draw a pretty graph.

But hey mainstream media is selling it and the public is buying it, and the media people are running to the bank with their money in hand.

Obviously the graph will be twice as bad for the elderly. Compare 0 to 15 and 50 to 90+.

As far as Italy, that's totally government responsibility!

I have to do the math with real numbers and facts: but 1 hospital bed per 10,000+/- people: 1.5 doctors per 20,000+/- people: 1 respirator per 100,000+/- people.

Either Italians are extremely healthy or they have a super piss poor healthcare system!!

I mean no disrespect to Italians, only to your government for not meeting your needs in time of healthcare crisis.
 
You are missing my point.

Is CV19 serious? Yes.

Should there be panic over CV19? No.

Are people dieing? Yes.

Is Cv19 the cause or multiplier as a cause of mass deaths? Don't know. Inconclusive data.

I'm at neither extreme. I prefer common sense middle.

i.e. You live in a central midwest town USA. Population 100. 25 people are under 15 years old, 25 people are between 15 and 40 years old, 25 people are between 41 and 60 years old, and 25 people are over 61 years old.

24 cases of CV19 infects your town.
News media instantly declares your town as a hot zone and ground zero for your area, and your state has no other cases of CV19, yet according to the media's numbers 25% of your state is infected and ground zero for your state.

Of the 24 cases 10 people die. That's less than 2/5ths. 2 children 15 and under: 1 developed pneumonia after contracting CV19, the other was already battling premature birth disorders after contracting CV19.

2 young adults: 1 athletic the other overweight and diabetic. The athlete survives, the diabetic dies.

4 adults over 50: 1 survives 3 die: 2 are over 80 near death since 6 months ago, 1 contracted CV19 24 hrs prior to death, the other negetive for CV19. 1 dies due to emphysema factory work related, contracted CV19 3 hours before death at age 60.

4 adults ages 20 to 40, good health, 1 dies from bronchial pneumonia 50/50 chance from CV19. The other 3: 1 common cold, 1 common flu, 1 seasonal bronchitis, all 3 developed fluid in the lungs, and treatment had no effects.

Suddenly, Breaking News, 25 %(+) children in your state under 15 years old will contract CV19, state population 15 and under 20,000. That means 5000 will be infected, 200 will die from CV19, 100 because of preexisting conditons.

The countries total population is 20 million under 15 years old. 500,000 under 15 years old will be infected, 20,000 will die, but only 10,000 due to preexisting conditions.

Your little town of 2000 people, just condemned, via the mainstream media, 20,000 kids under 15, but hey 10,000 already had preexisting conditions.

Now multiply that by 10, 100,1000 to represent an entire country. Then draw a pretty graph.

But hey mainstream media is selling it and the public is buying it, and the media people are running to the bank with their money in hand.

Obviously the graph will be twice as bad for the elderly. Compare 0 to 15 and 50 to 90+.

As far as Italy, that's totally government responsibility!

I have to do the math with real numbers and facts: but 1 hospital bed per 10,000+/- people: 1.5 doctors per 20,000+/- people: 1 respirator per 100,000+/- people.

Either Italians are extremely healthy or they have a super piss poor healthcare system!!

I mean no disrespect to Italians, only to your government for not meeting your needs in time of healthcare crisis.
Well, to put it bluntly despite the poor Italians, they have a piss poor healthcare system unfortunately. This is where it gets troubling, based on the available beds per capita we are not much different, and that is where this will all hinge. If we exceed that capacity we will look like Italy. And since we are now on the politics page anyway, despite my rule to NEVER EVER post on politics, this is why you see our president who went from being a deny-er to saying it's a huge issue, no more than 10 people should be around each other, and pushing for Senate help for americans. He finally saw what will happen if we can't slow this down, by staying away from eachother. It's as simple as that, yet a gigantic mountain to climb to achieve.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
60,686
Messages
1,324,152
Members
112,421
Latest member
richardhoare71
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

Incredible 54" Kudu Bull Hunted In South Africa!!​

Hunting a 45” Sable Bull | South Africa | Elite Hunting Outfitters​

Another Great Trip, with Another Happy Client! Can't beat fair prices, for great trophies!
xb40 wrote on Ivorygrip's profile.
You have the wrong person. I have no idea what you are talking about..
Safari Dave wrote on GUN & TROPHY INSURANCE's profile.
I have been using a "Personal Property" rider on my State Farm homeowner's policy to cover guns when I travel with them.
I have several firearms, but only one is worth over $20K (A Heym double rifle).
Very interested.
Would firearms be covered for damage, as well as, complete loss?
I'll can let the State Farm rider cover my watches...
 
Top