Nature Boy
AH enthusiast
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2017
- Messages
- 358
- Reaction score
- 288
- Location
- Denver, CO
- Media
- 1
- Member of
- SCI, RMEF
- Hunted
- Namibia, Mozambique
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/05/20/upshot/ukraine-us-aid-size.htmlBattlefields are indeed wasteful places. I have no doubt any number of munitions and small arms (NATO and Russian) will find their way onto the black market. It is a giant step to conclude Ukraine is not diligently employing the weaponry they have been provided as effectively as possible against the Russia's invasion.
And whatever is leaked off the battlefields of Ukraine is a pittance compared to what we left the Taliban in Afghanistan. That debacle is indeed worth additional review.
And no. The US government does not provide the Ukrainian government cash to buy weapon systems. US weapons are provided against the Congressional allocation, and direct contractor provided weapons are provided through DOD contracts written against that allocation. Even the NSAMS ADA system which is a joint Norwegian US project are being provided on DOD contract through Raytheon. Ukraine is not buying them with treasury dollars.
Jeez. Read what you posted. Yes there was planning to put mid-course interceptors in Poland. You do realize that Poland is a NATO member and is not Ukraine don't you? The interceptors also use a conventional warhead - not a nuke. Their placement there was to potentially engage Iranian missiles aimed a Europe.
Maybe this is wrong. Doubt that. lots of non wepaon money here