I have a 94 in 357, and I think it is superior to the 30-30, at close range. It is also a lot cheaper to buy ammo for than the 30-30. But it convinces me the 30-30 is better because of the range advantage, and the magic that cartridge has with a Barnes. It is almost like shooting broadheads.
My 357 is pretty nice, but it is a Puma, and the chance of hitting a deer cleanly at 300 yards is about the same as hitting a golf ball 300 yards, for a hole in one.
Also, as the trends continue the average barrel length of the 357s is like 16 inches. Myself, as a guy used to carrying a 68" weapon in the woods, to get close shots at deer, I am more in the Lever Evolution camp of a 22 inch barrel. As close to having a gun with a suppresor as one is likely to get in Canada.
My 357 is pretty nice, but it is a Puma, and the chance of hitting a deer cleanly at 300 yards is about the same as hitting a golf ball 300 yards, for a hole in one.
Also, as the trends continue the average barrel length of the 357s is like 16 inches. Myself, as a guy used to carrying a 68" weapon in the woods, to get close shots at deer, I am more in the Lever Evolution camp of a 22 inch barrel. As close to having a gun with a suppresor as one is likely to get in Canada.