Mauser 98 vs Blaser R8

[Ravensview]

I don’t have any fancy high end rifles, the fanciest one I have is my Shiloh Sharps model 1874, but all of my rifles have a wooden stock on them except 2 (one being a tikka 1x .22 that I love), that being said if I was starting out fresh I would probably go the R8 route, a lot about it just makes sense to me. Good luck in your choice

 

[WesRic404Jeff]

I once saw a Blaser R8 that I thought looked very nice, It was some sort of custom variant, it had the classic sporter stock (the one with wooden sides covering the action) with ebony foreend, open sights and was very nicely engraved. Not over the top, but rather tasteful. It looked nothing like a Blaser, more like a Mauser M98 except for the difference in action design of course. The bolt was silver nitrated and also engraved.

Cant find a picture of it right now, but the stock was much like this one, only with better wood.
View attachment 665082

I once saw a Blaser R8 that I thought looked very nice, It was some sort of custom variant, it had the classic sporter stock (the one with wooden sides covering the action) with ebony foreend, open sights and was very nicely engraved. Not over the top, but rather tasteful. It looked nothing like a Blaser, more like a Mauser M98 except for the difference in action design of course. The bolt was silver nitrated and also engraved.

Cant find a picture of it right now, but the stock was much like this one, only with better wood.
View attachment 665082

Could it be this one?

 

[KJE81]

Could it be this one?

It looks very similar but the one I found had open sights and a banded sling swivel on the barrel.

 

[Red Leg]

I once saw a Blaser R8 that I thought looked very nice, It was some sort of custom variant, it had the classic sporter stock (the one with wooden sides covering the action) with ebony foreend, open sights and was very nicely engraved. Not over the top, but rather tasteful. It looked nothing like a Blaser, more like a Mauser M98 except for the difference in action design of course. The bolt was silver nitrated and also engraved.

Cant find a picture of it right now, but the stock was much like this one, only with better wood.
View attachment 665082

Less the engraving, it might have been like this one which has taken a couple of buffalo and a small host of plains game. It has the sadly discontinued classic sporter stock.

I love and own both Mauser based rifles and Blaser R8s. This is my Rigby .275 in use on my last safari to Zambia (much to @spike.t 's relief, I did not bring the Blaser).

Both can be wonderful tools of our trade. But, I have concluded, and frankly it is not really close, the R8 is the finest production hunting rifle ever created. It has the best ergonomics and trigger that I have ever found on a production rifle. The brilliant trigger magazine design creates the sort of handy, short action package that one only finds in something like a No. 1. The barrel/change of chambering capability works perfectly. Only a double rifle, with a far more limited utility envelope, is as easy with which to travel. They are a truly remarkable creation.

As Stuart @Tally-Ho HUNTING SAFARIS suggest, weight is important. In a .375, the standard barrels on the alloy receiver create a perfect rifle. With ammunition and scope, it will top out just over nine pounds depending upon stock. That is ideal for a rifle that might be carried all day following a buffalo or an eland.

 

[KJE81]

Less the engraving, it might have been like this one which has taken a couple of buffalo and a small host of plains game. It has the sadly discontinued classic sporter stock.

I love and own both Mauser based rifles and the Blaser R8. This is my Rigby .275 in use on my last safari to Zambia (much to @spike.t 's relief, I did not bring the Blaser).

Both can be wonderful tools of our trade. But, I have concluded, and frankly it is not really close, the R8 is the finest production hunting rifle ever created. It has the best ergonomics and trigger that I have ever found on a production rifle. The brilliant trigger magazine design creates the sort of handy, short action package that one only finds in something like a No. 1. The barrel/change of chambering capability works perfectly. Only a double rifle, with a far more limited utility envelope, is as easy with which to travel. They are a truly remarkable creation.

As Stuart @Tally-Ho HUNTING SAFARIS suggest, weight is important. In a .375, the standard barrels on the alloy receiver create a perfect rifle. With ammunition and scope, it will top out just over nine pounds depending upon stock. That is ideal for a rifle that might be carried all day following a buffalo or an eland.

Yes it is very close, aside from engraving the only difference was that If I recall correctly it was silver nitrated rather then blued on the action/bolt area.

I am sure that the Blaser R8 is of very high quality and probably superior to most other bolt action rifles, but it does not appeal to me in quite the same way as the Highland Stalker in your post does

However your Blaser R8 with the classic sporter stock and open sights does come much, much closer to a Mauser M98 then a regular R8 with the two part stock. If I were ever to buy a Blaser I would go for one with classic sporter stock. I actually had a Blaser BD880, but that was built before Blaser started with their more modern offerings.

 

[Ontario Hunter]

No Klingon rifles for me. Don't like the price tag and see no need for straight pull. Interchangeable barrels is a gimmick. If I'm too wimpy ro carry a normal two gun case to and from baggage check in, I'm WAY too wimpy to be hunting big game. Okay, to be clear I don't classify sitting over bait or a waterhole as real hunting.

 

[V.Veritas]

All I can say is that yall don't know what you are missing! If you are in the club you know.

"You know what you know.
You know what you don't know.
You don't know what you don't know.
You know what you know, but what you know it ain't just so."

This is one of my favorite sayings.

 

[roklok]

Mauser 98 for me. I have been tempted by the Blasers from time to time. They certainly have a list of advantages, and are highly regarded by many. You will never convince me the Blaser is as reliable as a time tested bolt action though. There is a term, "Blaser click" that was coined because of failures to fire with Blasers. I know, I know, it is user error, or improperly loaded ammo, or dust, or..... My PH recounted a story of an elephant hunter he guided that had three clicks in a row with his R8. Elephant wasn't taken. Luckily it went the other way. The dust in Namibia in October is extremely fine and airborne, it coats everything and gets into small spaces. In these conditions I would definitely feel more confident in a Mauser which has been proven in very adverse conditions for well over 100 years. I am not one who gets hung up on push feed vs CRF, but I do think its amusing how staunch CRF guys make an exception to the Blasers. Why ? Because they cost a lot of money ?

 

[uplander01]

It's a matter of style really, classic or modern. I've made it clear how I feel about Blaser Rifles,..but it can't be denied, they work quite well. I'd get 98's or Dakotas, much classier rifle, better open back up sights as well.