Mark Sullivan shows us how to handle a Double Rifle

Not commenting on him or his methods, but he does have one thing absolutely correct: In A Fight- Front Sight.

I suppose those that just use scopes won't recognize the significance but those of us that went through Edson Range or Parris Island well remember the Tip of the Front Sight Blade and the visuals from when we used it in actual confrontations.

Well, I didn't do Paris Island but I did wear an AR to work for a rather long time. I use both. I make the first shot with a scope whenever possible due to its inherent accuracy and thus lesser resulting potential danger to the rest of the hunting party. I use open sites when the first shot may have gone wrong and a follow-up is required. Your point about the front sight is exactly correct - and why all too many shots under pressure go high.

What I despise is this blatant BS that one is somehow not manly enough if he goes "into battle" with a scoped rifle. I have been in battle, and even hunting dangerous game, isn't anything very much like a battle. It can be dangerous, but as I believe Ivan Carter once put it very clearly "we have the guns".
 
I appreciate bringing up the "go to war" and "going to battle" comments. It's completely offensive hyperbole that only someone who never served would dare use. In his mind he thinks warfare is like a DG safari. Idiotic.



Thank you to those that served.
 
I appreciate bringing up the "go to war" and "going to battle" comments. It's completely offensive hyperbole that only someone who never served would dare use. In his mind he thinks warfare is like a DG safari. Idiotic.

Yes indeed. Many of us know the difference.
 
Last edited:
He makes entertaining videos, and hes lived surprisingly long compared to his approach to buffalo hunting....

I really dont have a positive opinion of him, but i would keep it to myself.

I hunt more buffalo in a season than most guys in a lifetime, and what I've learned is to do the opposite of what mark tells you when approaching a wounded buffalo or your going to end up 6 feet under......

He can shoot though, and like his double, however I've stopped numerous buffalo and other dangerous game while carrying my 375 years back before my 470, and the closest i came to being killed was with a bad shot placement with the 470...... so yes, doesnt matter what caliber, shot placement is key and i love my 375 as well, and perfect for buffalo. However i do believe for a backup or ph rifle, you need at least 500gr for charging animals though...

Just my 2 cents
 
Last edited:
I'll show up to hunt with him carrying a Kreighoff .500 Nitro.

Sullivan doesn't like Kreighoff doubles, and he thinks the .500 nitro is for sissies.

The donation from Krieghoff was probably not high enough.
He is an entertainer and has a talent to make money.
Serious professional hunting is an other thing.
But the Heym double is wonderful.
Foxi
 
Interestingly, I thought I heard him state that his experience is that only 5% of the time will a Buffalo charge. I thought that an odd statement for someone who emphasizes the drama and danger of a charge.
 
Interestingly, I thought I heard him state that his experience is that only 5% of the time will a Buffalo charge. I thought that an odd statement for someone who emphasizes the drama and danger of a charge.


He's full of amoral contradictions.

"The animal chooses how it's going to die" vs "make no mistake, I'm picking a fight to get them to charge".

I'd love to see a client sue Sullivan for all he's worth for intentionallly endangering the client by making no effort to mitigate risk, furthered by his boasts that he actively seeks to heighten the risk to client by inducing a charge. This guy is uninsurable.
 
He's full of amoral contradictions.

"The animal chooses how it's going to die" vs "make no mistake, I'm picking a fight to get them to charge".

I'd love to see a client sue Sullivan for all he's worth for intentionallly endangering the client by making no effort to mitigate risk, furthered by his boasts that he actively seeks to heighten the risk to client by inducing a charge. This guy is uninsurable.

I think the problem there is that he doesn't hide what he intends to do, instead he makes it clear to his potential clients. Not sure how you can sue him for it, when you've signed up to it. Plus where do you sue him, in Tanzania? Good luck with that. I don't think you could sue him here in the USA.

But I do concur with your feelings about the matter, not a fan of the bravado. And as @Red Leg alludes to, it's a bit insulting to those who actually have fought in battle.
 
@PHOENIX PHIL not to sound disagreeable, but yes, anything ever happens to a client he gets sued in USA where the contract happened.

Sullivan's statements would be prima facie evidence of reckless endangerment. That's really the issue, he says "you can be as cowardly as you want" at one point. Risk mitigation is expected of a professional at all times and Sullivan is repeatedly affirming that he is intentionally throwing caution to the wind.

When, not if, someone is injured or dies on a Sullivan hunt it is going to bode very poorly for the hunting community and the average customer has no idea how much peril they were intentionally exposed to. (Those of us analyzing him are giving much more thought than an average client)
 
Sullivan talks as if we are at war with the game.....NOT :sick: :Vomit:
 
Now that I know, I am practicing wearing them around the house!

Well you never know when you may do battle with a mouse....so you'll be prepared now! (y)
 
@PHOENIX PHIL not to sound disagreeable, but yes, anything ever happens to a client he gets sued in USA where the contract happened.

Sullivan's statements would be prima facie evidence of reckless endangerment. That's really the issue, he says "you can be as cowardly as you want" at one point. Risk mitigation is expected of a professional at all times and Sullivan is repeatedly affirming that he is intentionally throwing caution to the wind.

When, not if, someone is injured or dies on a Sullivan hunt it is going to bode very poorly for the hunting community and the average customer has no idea how much peril they were intentionally exposed to. (Those of us analyzing him are giving much more thought than an average client)

Well I'm no lawyer so I'll take your word for it. But I'd wonder how far the lawsuit would go? As mentioned I don't believe the man hides what he intends to do, quite the opposite, he's very open about it. His bravado is part of the sales pitch. If a person signs up to this having been informed as to what to expect and signs an indemnity agreement, how do you win? You signed up to this shit, so don't be surprised or angry if you end up in a pile of it.....at least that'd be my line of thinking were I on the jury.

Now if as you say the average customer has no idea how much danger they're signing up to.....well that's a different situation, even with the indemnity agreement in place.

Whatever the case I won't be hunting with Mr. Sullivan.
 
A great video for the antis...

That´s a person I would not associate with in any aspect.
 
He's full of amoral contradictions.

"The animal chooses how it's going to die" vs "make no mistake, I'm picking a fight to get them to charge".

I'd love to see a client sue Sullivan for all he's worth for intentionallly endangering the client by making no effort to mitigate risk, furthered by his boasts that he actively seeks to heighten the risk to client by inducing a charge. This guy is uninsurable.

I personally find no glory in antagonizing a wounded animal. It seems very callous.
 
i am so pleased i now know how to wear my binos............as far as i got :E Shake Head:

Now you make me want to watch this just to see what you are talking about. Damn!


Proper Bino Carry.jpg


 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
57,938
Messages
1,243,321
Members
102,367
Latest member
Eviction Pest Control
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Grz63 wrote on Werty's profile.
(cont'd)
Rockies museum,
CM Russel museum and lewis and Clark interpretative center
Horseback riding in Summer star ranch
Charlo bison range and Garnet ghost town
Flathead lake, road to the sun and hiking in Glacier NP
and back to SLC (via Ogden and Logan)
Grz63 wrote on Werty's profile.
Good Morning,
I plan to visit MT next Sept.
May I ask you to give me your comments; do I forget something ? are my choices worthy ? Thank you in advance
Philippe (France)

Start in Billings, Then visit little big horn battlefield,
MT grizzly encounter,
a hot springs (do you have good spots ?)
Looking to buy a 375 H&H or .416 Rem Mag if anyone has anything they want to let go of
 
Top