Should one prefer to hunt more often in Africa under not so dreamy conditions, or should one make for the same money only one expensive safari in a wild area of Africa once in lifetime?
Tomorrow is promised to no one.
If you have funds to hunt plains game on budget do it. Do it now
Try saving money for wild areas, for later and hope for the best.
On this forum you can find often "cancelation" hunts. These things happen, Those were hunts planned and booked, but clients had to cancel them, on force majeure of some kind. These things happen.
So, if saving will delay your safari for 5 years or more, there is no guarantee you will make it at all.
Go when you can, on budget that you have.
That is my way of thinking.
I also repeated often a word that someone else once said: last 200 meters of stalking is always the same. So, it is very questionable what are "less dreamy" conditions to hunt.
Despite of all the romance that Safari brings in mind of people who have never been to Africa, Africa has changed in last 100 years, just as America has changed, and Europe has changed.
Globally hunting is not the same as 100 years ago. Things change. And today we hunt in modern day Africa.
I think if you find a proper outfitter in South africa, you can have a safari of lifetime.
I hunted 3 times central farmland in Namibia, and once Caprivi strip in Namibia. Yes, there is the difference in ambient, and in biotop, and in animals density and in general impressions, but this does not reduce my previous hunts experiences for a bit.
Do safari as you can, plan another one within reasonable time, and with available funds.