Leupold VXR 2-7x33 vs VX6HD 1-6 for 375HH

Question is do you want straight tube scope for plains game or something with a bigger objective? I'm currently scope hunting and considering a 1.6-8x42 by Kahles if I can find one. Also baby a 1.5-6x42. I'm an illuminated dot kinda guy and think that helps with fast target acquisition...
 
Question is do you want straight tube scope for plains game or something with a bigger objective? I'm currently scope hunting and considering a 1.6-8x42 by Kahles if I can find one. Also baby a 1.5-6x42. I'm an illuminated dot kinda guy and think that helps with fast target acquisition...

I think the straight tubes are purchased for
1) cosmetics and sometimes weight
2) that's how very low magnification scopes are made for whatever reasons and those are your choices.

If you found a 1.5ish-8x42 that you are happy with the quality and weight, then that's just about perfect. You are going to get a lot more field of view at the higher powers which imo matters a lot. I always start at the lowest power but anything over 50-60 yards gets moved up to 5 or 6 power but you still want to be able to find them quickly
 
Both of the OP's options are good choices.
I personally favor the VX-R 2-7. I put one on my son's rifle a few years ago. After the first season with it on his rifle I ended up buying a few more for myself to top my .270, .275 & .375. Being 4oz lighter helps with balance on the rifle and is significantly less stressful to the mount screws. So far I haven't had any hindrance by the bottom end FOV up close or the top end at distance.

As my second choice for my .375 is the Swarovski Z6i 1.7-10x42. It's heavier then the VX-R and I find the reticle a little hard to find in low light without the illumination on.
 
I hadnt considered tube length for mounting but figured there is an easy solution for that, even if it means mounting a rail. As to eye relief, the VXR beats the VX6 by 1/2in. Field of view , the 1 power obviously will have more but I guess that leads me back to my original question: Has anyone ever found the FOV at 2x lacking so much that hey couldn't make the shot where having a 1x would have made a difference?
I have Leupold VX6HD 1-6 and VX6HS 2-12 scopes.

For me, the true one power of the first far outweighs the extra factor of 2 magnification of the second.

Looking through the 1X setting of the 1-6, the view seen through the scope transitions without interruption to the view outside the scope, if you shoot with both eyes open, giving true binocular vision, as with eyes only. Not so for 2X (or 1.25 X, 1.5x, 1.7X). The advantage of the continuous field of view is huge, in speed of target acquisition and tracking capability on moving game.

For the 1X, the field of view is twice that of the 2X, a benefit certainly, but I don't see it as a make-break factor in the comparison. FOV of the 2X is adequate for close work. But the scope FOV-reality FOV transition leaves a big blind spot for the 2X, a discontinuous total FOV.

A max 6 or 8 power upper magnification is good for 400 yds no problem. The 6 power brings a 400 yd target to 67 yds; the 8 power brings a 400 yd target to 50 yds. Unless shooting bumblebees, this seems adequate to me. Of course you may be a bit more comfortable with greater magnification, but probably don't really need it. For longer ranges, the picture of course changes.

I've wanted a true 1X scope for 60 years. The great sighting advantage of the scope isn't its magnification but its no-alignment sight picture - just place the cross hair and pull the trigger, no messing around with old-school iron sight alignment. I think this is 60% of the advantage of a scope. Another 30% of its advantage is in giving a clearer sight picture under low-light conditions. These are a big deal to older shooters. A little magnification is nice, but is a secondary benefit to the scope sight.

Unless you'll never have to quickly acquire a sight picture in your shooting, especially on running game, strongly, strongly consider the true 1X bottom power scopes. LeupoldVX6 1-6, Swarovski Z8i 1-8 are excellent sights that I've used. Expensive - yes. The best available - in my opinion, yes, hands down. The Swarovski Z8i especially offers an ideal magnification range, and its circle-dot illuminated reticle is very very good. Other makers probably have as good products, I'm just not familiar with them.

Get your hands on a true 1x and test what I mention about the FOV continuity. Don't buy a scope without looking at this. Unless the true 1X is price-prohibited, which can easily be the case. Then the 1.25-4 is pretty good.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
57,908
Messages
1,242,732
Members
102,300
Latest member
joe laws
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Grz63 wrote on Werty's profile.
(cont'd)
Rockies museum,
CM Russel museum and lewis and Clark interpretative center
Horseback riding in Summer star ranch
Charlo bison range and Garnet ghost town
Flathead lake, road to the sun and hiking in Glacier NP
and back to SLC (via Ogden and Logan)
Grz63 wrote on Werty's profile.
Good Morning,
I plan to visit MT next Sept.
May I ask you to give me your comments; do I forget something ? are my choices worthy ? Thank you in advance
Philippe (France)

Start in Billings, Then visit little big horn battlefield,
MT grizzly encounter,
a hot springs (do you have good spots ?)
Looking to buy a 375 H&H or .416 Rem Mag if anyone has anything they want to let go of
Erling Søvik wrote on dankykang's profile.
Nice Z, 1975 ?
Tintin wrote on JNevada's profile.
Hi Jay,

Hope you're well.

I'm headed your way in January.

Attending SHOT Show has been a long time bucket list item for me.

Finally made it happen and I'm headed to Vegas.

I know you're some distance from Vegas - but would be keen to catch up if it works out.

Have a good one.

Mark
 
Top