I think Redfeild folded in 1998. Whoever the conglomerate is that owns Leupold owns the Redfield name. Here's a pretty good write up on the history of Redfield.
Yes, I hope the original family members who retain power on the board continue to retain a clear vision of the company's future based on it's successful past. Unfortunately, CEOs, CFOs and other major stockholders and unseen powers that be sometimes have a different vision. Marketing low end entry level merchandise is sometimes a troubling sign. I can fully understand buying a competitors brand name like Redfield- that makes sense and to some extent diversifying by purchasing other related and known brands of quality like Nosler. However, later selling Nosler may reveal other unknowns beneath the surface. Marketing and selling company named merchandise that seems below a company's normal standard remains troubling to me.
I have a lot of Leupolds
But I have a lot of Euros too
Ziess. Kahles. Swarovski
My High power Rifle sport. European Scopes
My. 22 or 22 hornet 222 rem sport Leupold
No reason just ended that way I will take Leupold any day
thanks for your reply bob , is it feasible to build a 444 on a P14/M17 , or is the no4 enfield easier to build? i know where i can buy a lothar walther barrel in 44, 1-38 twist , but i think with a barrel crown of .650" the profile is too light .
hey bob , new on here. i specifically joined to enquire about a 444 you built on a Enfield 4-1 you built . who did the barrel and what was the twist and profile specs ? look foward to your reply . cheers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.