Kevin Peacocke
AH ambassador
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2018
- Messages
- 6,119
- Reaction score
- 21,969
- Location
- Harare Zimbabwe
- Media
- 108
- Articles
- 2
- Member of
- Cleveland Gun Club
- Hunted
- Zimbabwe, SouthAfrica
Well said, there is hope.Thanks for sharing. It's really great that writers like you are bringing the issues in South Africa to the American public. It is important for hunters to be informed. But, I personally think there are notable differences between South Africa and Mugabe's Zimbabwe. Significantly, Mugabe came up on a tide of animus and used that to overturn land ownership, while Mandela diffused that animus and, in a sense, protected the landowner from the mob.
The ANC did not use those divisive racist tactics like Mugabe did when the issues were red hot, and so they don't have a lot of momentum for it now. In a sense, Mandela diffused that type of social upheaval. Also, the success of the DA in recent elections cannot be overlooked. That is good for South Africa, and her racial minorities.
My betting is the ANC is trying to poach votes from the EFF to keep power, but they don't have the momentum to create new converts to their racist ideology. For them it's a numbers game. Poverty will always create opportunities for revolutionary rhetoric, so that gives the EFF some power, and the ANC wants some of it. Thats how they will hedge against recent electoral setbacks. But if we are looking at recent elections, it would seem South Africans know what they have to do to move their country forward.
The bigger threat is that no one gives two bits for hunting unless they have some connection to the industry, so they are passive observers of changes to wildlife laws; thats how Botswana happens. However, I imagine, if the people of South Africa know hunting pays the bills, and if their leaders don't have interests in photo-tourism outfits, then there will be a political will to preserve it.