Throwing gas on a fire that you have to put out by yourself is not the brightest of actions.
In the context of this forum or other hunting related media where the target audience understands and can appreciate the photos, stories, articles, and general discussion, I have no issue
at all with the photo.
In a perfect world, all would understand how conservation works and how hunting is and has always been a large part of our existence. We don't live there.
Showing old photos of your great-grandfather at a family reunion is appropriate. Purposely showing them to the old fart down the street from whom great-grandfather stole great-grandmother, just to piss him off, is not.
So, although I applaud the passion to fight and flip the finger, in the context of general social media and the fact the we have to fight and defend conservation by way of hunting at every turn, I take issue with the
idea of the photo
if it was being used just to jab the antis and melt snowflakes.
My anger and frustration with the persistent unreasonableness of the thought process of the anti-hunting sentiment is the same as everyone here. So I would love to scream and holler and sling crap at them every chance I got. But that would be very selfish on my part as all hunters would have to pay the price for my actions. We are already fighting a huge fire with no idea if it will just get away or not, so throwing gas on it when nobody else is going to help us put it out seems senseless to me.
Have you noticed that when a hunter does or says something that is perceived as negative, then all hunters are likened to them? But when a hunter is recognized for great conservation efforts and/or lifelong achievements to society he/she is deemed the exception.
This fire will never be put out. It is hard enough to try to control. If we keep throwing gas we're gonna get burned.