How many people have a 35 whelen?

I guess if I had asked for a rifle to shoot a good, tough 225 or 250 grain 35 caliber bullet accurately with a 2500 fps MV, for an average range shot of 75-100 yards on an animal of elk size and toughness, I could not have found a flaw in going with the Whelen. However, that would have been a pretty narrow range of ideal circumstances and I never asked that question- simple as that. When I had two of them I was asking questions like, "what is the ideal 300 yard pronghorn or mule deer or caribou caliber in my safe or what one caliber/rifle would work best for impala and wildebeest and kudu and eland and buffalo?" :)
75 Yards?? You are just pulling @Bob Nelson 35Whelen chain, or you have never actually examined the Whelen's ballistics.
 
CEH,
My double rifles all begin with a 4. as do some of my lever guns.
My mid size rifles includes .308, .338, 357,
 
i shot a cow buffalo with a older MS rifle in 9.2x62 and it didn,t complain, 250 gr barns x at 2400+ fps, a 35 whelen would have done the same thing with a 250 gr bullet a the same speed.

DSCN9562 (4).JPG
DSCN9559 (4).JPG
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My neighbor has a 35 whelen Ackley improved it's very nice but I can't play keep up with the Joneses so I have a 350 Remington Magnum and a 33806 LOL
 
I will reiterate. When I was putting together my Alaskan Guide Rifle I put a 19" barrel on a Mauser 98 action in .35 Whelan. Why? Because 5 rds of 250 gr at 2500 fps equals a metric shit ton more horsepower than 3 rd of 250 gr at 2650 fps when one is following a blood trail into an alder patch.
 
I will reiterate. When I was putting together my Alaskan Guide Rifle I put a 19" barrel on a Mauser 98 action in .35 Whelan. Why? Because 5 rds of 250 gr at 2500 fps equals a metric shit ton more horsepower than 3 rd of 250 gr at 2650 fps when one is following a blood trail into an alder patch.
contradict me, iffen you have the experience.
 
@318AE
I have a soft spot for a lot of old midbores. As a kid I fell in love with the 318WR and 350 Rigby and always wanted a 404 and a Schultz and Larson 7x61 Sharpe and hart.
Alas I will never have any so I chose the 35 Whelen. Closest I could get to a 350 rigby and be able to afford it. It is as close as I could get and is an awesome round. It give an insight into what the old cartridges were really capable of and how well they worked. To me it's a shame the new cartridges have overshadowed some of the old that have the same capabilities.
Bob
Bob,
With all the flak and teasing your subject to with your promotion of and espousing the accolades of the .35 Whelen, I have to say I do admire a certain “economy of scale” with regards to not only the Whelen, but the .358 Winchester and .35/.303 (don’t remember the wildcat name). By that I mean, plentiful, inexpensive military cartridges (and thus reloadable brass) adapted for hunting with better bullets. Then, you neck them up to .35 with an appropriate bullet and you have now an original military cartridge that can now take very large game animals. Many other cartridges have done the same thing, but not with the quantity of the inexpensive military brass available back in the day.
CEH
 
Bob,
With all the flak and teasing your subject to with your promotion of and espousing the accolades of the .35 Whelen, I have to say I do admire a certain “economy of scale” with regards to not only the Whelen, but the .358 Winchester and .35/.303 (don’t remember the wildcat name). By that I mean, plentiful, inexpensive military cartridges (and thus reloadable brass) adapted for hunting with better bullets. Then, you neck them up to .35 with an appropriate bullet and you have now an original military cartridge that can now take very large game animals. Many other cartridges have done the same thing, but not with the quantity of the inexpensive military brass available back in the day.
CEH
@CoElkHunter
The 35/303 in Australia was called the 35 Territorian, as bout the same as a 38/55 in the old SMLEs.
Bob
 
I have a .35 Whelen, but I also have a .35 Remington, a .358 Winchester, a 9X57 Mauser, a .350 Rigby Magnum, a .358 Norma Magnum, a .350 G&H Magnum and a .35 Brown Improved Whelen, with a .400/.350 Rigby and a .350 No. 2 Rigby in the works. Do I seem to have a preference for .35 Caliber?
Yes, very impressive collection of .35s. When you finally build a .35 Territorian (Bob said) (.35/.303), you will have reached Shangri-la in the .35 cartridge world. Good luck and God speed!
 
@Cousin Bongo
Love the idea of the scout style set up. All you need is the 10 round mag and it would fulfill all the criteria..
Only thing is it would spoil the beautiful clean lines of your rifles. They are very nice.
Bob
Thanks, Bob. You're very kind.

Both rifles are pseudo-Scouts but I like them. (FWIW, there is actually no 10 round magazine criteria requirement for a Scout rifle.) I took the second rifle (the one with the walnut stock) to the Sconce and showed it to Jeff Cooper and he was okay with it as a pseudo-Scout, which is how I presented it. (I was friends with Jeff and took several of my Scout attempts to him over the years for critique and evaluation.)

I really like the 35 Whelen. It was my go-to cartridge for a number of years when I lived in Alaska...until the late Don Johnson, during one of our conversations out a Bear Lake Lodge, recommended I give the 375 H&H a whirl due to its greater capability and international résumé. (I built a 375 H&H pseudo-Scout and it became, and remains, my go-to medium bore. This one:
KtpdLrP.jpg
)

CB
 
Last edited:
Bob,
With all the flak and teasing your subject to with your promotion of and espousing the accolades of the .35 Whelen, I have to say I do admire a certain “economy of scale” with regards to not only the Whelen, but the .358 Winchester and .35/.303 (don’t remember the wildcat name). By that I mean, plentiful, inexpensive military cartridges (and thus reloadable brass) adapted for hunting with better bullets. Then, you neck them up to .35 with an appropriate bullet and you have now an original military cartridge that can now take very large game animals. Many other cartridges have done the same thing, but not with the quantity of the inexpensive military brass available back in the day.
CEH
@CoElkHunter
The 35/303 in Australia was called the 35 Territorian, as bout the same as a 38/55 in the old SMLEs.
Bob
Yes, very impressive collection of .35s. When you finally build a .35 Territorian (Bob said) (.35/.303), you will have reached Shangri-la in the .35 cartridge world. Good luck and God speed!
@CoElkHunter
If you build a 35/303 on my case design for my 25 and put it in a P14 it will go close to the Whelen.
Bob
 
75 Yards?? You are just pulling @Bob Nelson 35Whelen chain, or you have never actually examined the Whelen's ballistics.
Nonsense! Have had two of them. After reading what you guys say about the Whelen it’s darn near a 9.3 because of the SD potential with heavier bullets… which reading the stuff about the 9.3 is darn near a 375 because of the SD potential of heavier bullets and so and so forth. So logic therefore dictates the Whelen is really darned near the equal to the 375. Whatever anyone thinks… no argument from me. Bob’s OP asked a simple question about who owns a Whelen? I’ve owned two. worked up loads in both with multiple bullets, powders and used a chronograph. Shot them a lot, then sent them down the road. My opinion remains unchanged. The Whelen is not a bad cartridge. But IMO it seems to be kind of a Jack of all trades but master of none- sorry :)
 
@CoElkHunter
The 35/303 in Australia was called the 35 Territorian, as bout the same as a 38/55 in the old SMLEs.
Bob

@CoElkHunter
If you build a 35/303 on my case design for my 25 and put it in a P14 it will go close to the Whelen.
Bob
Bob,
If it's your case design, it must be the .35/.303 Nelson Improved? I think I'd still rather build a .35/7.7 Jap, eventually to be known as a .35 Banzai Nelson Express on a good, strong Arisaka 99 action. Apparently they are much stronger actions than the Mauser 98 or P14 actions according to you per a previous post somewhere here regarding P.O. Ackley's experiments with rifle action strengths.
CEH
 
Bob,
If it's your case design, it must be the .35/.303 Nelson Improved? I think I'd still rather build a .35/7.7 Jap, eventually to be known as a .35 Banzai Nelson Express on a good, strong Arisaka 99 action. Apparently they are much stronger actions than the Mauser 98 or P14 actions according to you per a previous post somewhere here regarding P.O. Ackley's experiments with rifle action strengths.
CEH
@CoElkHunter
You could always call it the Arizona Elk Slayer.
Or the th 35 sushi
Bob
 
If you want better performance try 60.5 grains of varget and a 225gn accubond. Or the following
View attachment 415162
Or try speers online loads with the 250 grain hotcore for 2,700fps
Bob
With the air quality being so bad here in Ludifisk land and my lungs still not up to par because of Covid I decided to do a little scope swap. I took my 3x15 ED glass Nikon and put it on my 375 Whitworth and take the Leupold VX5HD 3x15 and put on the Remington 35 Whelen, I'm Convinced that the Whelen will be the rifle I take to Namibia in 2023.Of course this means I need to sight the Remington in again but all I have left are 250g Speers. I have been doing my research but maybe you already have a hot set up for me. I like Velocity but not at the expense of accuracy, so what do you guys think?
 
With the air quality being so bad here in Ludifisk land and my lungs still not up to par because of Covid I decided to do a little scope swap. I took my 3x15 ED glass Nikon and put it on my 375 Whitworth and take the Leupold VX5HD 3x15 and put on the Remington 35 Whelen, I'm Convinced that the Whelen will be the rifle I take to Namibia in 2023.Of course this means I need to sight the Remington in again but all I have left are 250g Speers. I have been doing my research but maybe you already have a hot set up for me. I like Velocity but not at the expense of accuracy, so what do you guys think?
@Rob404
Here's a load for the 250s that is both very potent and accurate.
Bob
Screenshot_20210711-135801_Drive.jpg

2,700 fps That should get your attention
 

Forum statistics

Threads
58,002
Messages
1,244,998
Members
102,476
Latest member
Mcodora
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Grz63 wrote on roklok's profile.
Hi Roklok
I read your post on Caprivi. Congratulations.
I plan to hunt there for buff in 2026 oct.
How was the land, very dry ? But à lot of buffs ?
Thank you / merci
Philippe
Fire Dog wrote on AfricaHunting.com's profile.
Chopped up the whole thing as I kept hitting the 240 character limit...
Found out the trigger word in the end... It was muzzle or velocity. dropped them and it posted.:)
Fire Dog wrote on AfricaHunting.com's profile.
2,822fps, ES 8.2
This compares favorably to 7 Rem Mag. with less powder & recoil.
Fire Dog wrote on AfricaHunting.com's profile.
*PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS FOR MY RIFLE, ALWAYS APPROACH A NEW LOAD CAUTIOUSLY!!*
Rifle is a Pierce long action, 32" 1:8.5 twist Swan{Au} barrel
{You will want a 1:8.5 to run the heavies but can get away with a 1:9}
Peterson .280AI brass, CCI 200 primers, 56.5gr of 4831SC, 184gr Berger Hybrid.
Fire Dog wrote on AfricaHunting.com's profile.
I know that this thread is more than a year old but as a new member I thought I would pass along my .280AI loading.
I am shooting F Open long range rather than hunting but here is what is working for me and I have managed a 198.14 at 800 meters.
That is for 20 shots. The 14 are X's which is a 5" circle.
 
Top