How do you organize your ammo wallet?

First of all, thank you all for your responses and great suggestions!

In reading these, some people suggest all soft points for buffalo and (it seems) that others suggest a mix of soft and solid.

Could I kindly ask of those who feel like responding again, would you explain the rationale for using, or not using, solids on buffalo?
Hi, @franzfmdavis

Very logical question to ask. Let me explain. When I first began hunting in Africa in 1974… the standard practice was to load a soft point for the first shot and solids for the follow up shot. In a magazine rifle, it was soft point in the chamber and solids in the magazine. In a double rifle, it was soft point in the first barrel & solid in the second barrel.

The logic was that (as a client hunter) your first shot would invariably be made from a perfectly broadside position (which your white hunter would get you to) and from this angle… the soft points of those days (for example: the RWS Kegelspitze Cone Point) could be reliably expected to penetrate into the heart-lung region behind the shoulder (provided that you avoided the heavy shoulder bone/humerus/scapula). After the first shot, the Cape buffalo would be either departing (i.e offering only quartering away or going away shots) or (relatively less commonly) charging (i.e offering only frontal shots). At these angles, the soft points of those days seldom could be reliably expected to penetrate deep enough into the vital organs. Hence, we had to rely exclusively upon the solid for follow up shots.

My initial set up (in .375 Holland & Holland Magnum magazine rifles) was one RWS 300Gr Kegelspitze Cone Point followed by RWS 300Gr nickel jacketed round nosed FMJ solids (and later, Remington 300Gr Hornady round nosed steel jacketed FMJ solids starting from 1982) in the rest of the magazine.
IMG_1794.jpeg
IMG_4097.jpeg
IMG_4096.jpeg
IMG_1795.jpeg

In this double barreled .458 Winchester Magnum Belgium made boxlock ejector, it was a (hand loaded) Hornady 500Gr soft point in the left barrel for the first shot and a (hand loaded) Hornady 500Gr round nosed steel jacketed FMJ solid in the right barrel for the follow up shot.
IMG_1789.jpeg


Aside from the fact that soft points generated larger wound cavities in the vital organs of Cape buffalo on body shots to the heart-lung region (which accelerated blood loss and led to the game hemorrhaging faster from blood loss), they possessed one more advantage. They did not over penetrate. You see, the vast majority of African Cape buffalo are hunted in herds. And using solid bullets always runs the risk of accidentally wounding another animal after your bullet passes completely through your intended target animal. During my first Safari to Kenya in 1974, I had (in fact) accidentally wounded a Cape buffalo cow (which I didn’t even notice) when my bullet (an RWS 300Gr round nosed nickel jacketed FMJ solid) had passed through my targeted bull. Back in those days, you could barely get away with this sort of thing. I hesitate to think of the legal repercussions if a client made such a mistake on a Safari today.

In the mid 1980s, the concept of the controlled expansion bullet was first developed. Swift came out with the A Frame in 1984. Jack Carter developed the Trophy Bonded Bear Claw in 1985. Barnes came out with the X in 1989. I was first introduced to the Federal Premium Trophy Bonded Bear Claw 300Gr factory load in 1993. And after just one Safari, I resolved to never employ solid bullets on Cape buffalo anymore. Here, we had a bullet which could cleanly penetrate a Cape buffalo from ANY angle while generating a desirably large wound cavity without any risk of passing completely through the target animal & accidentally wounding another head of game.
IMG_1356.jpeg
IMG_1355.jpeg
IMG_1354.jpeg
IMG_1353.jpeg
IMG_1530.jpeg
IMG_1807.jpeg

Even though (post 1993) I mostly used the Federal Premium Trophy Bonded Bear Claw, I used other types of controlled expansion bullets over the years on Cape buffalo as well. The Barnes TSX and Rhino Solid Shank in particular, are stoutly constructed enough to even reach a Cape buffalo’s vital organs with shots taken at acute angles. They can even reach the brain with a shot taken under the Cape buffalo’s boss. Hence, I completely abandoned the solid for my Cape buffalo hunting purposes.

I hope that this provides some useful insight to your question.

On a related subject: In my field experience, a non expanding bullet under .450 caliber can’t be expected to reliably kill a Cape buffalo with a heart-lung shot all too quickly anyway.
 
Last edited:
I’ve never used solids and for me it’s totally based on PH preference. A-Frames have been all I’ve used and I’ve had great performance from them. I would not hesitate to go with TSX personally either, but pass throughs would be something to look out for with them.
 
After listening to the big game hunting podcast with Kevin Robertson. I’m going with in my 375 H&H, North Fork 350 grain soft as my first shot then 350 grain CPU for follow up.
He really rated these for the follow up shots. Since he literally wrote the book on the perfect shot as well as trained PH and worked as one that’s good enough for me. I’ve also looked at the stats which are bloody good.
That’s my plan anyway.
 
Could I kindly ask of those who feel like responding again, would you explain the rationale for using, or not using, solids on buffalo?
Solids on buffalo, the old school:
The rationale of this arrangment is from old times, when soft points were of poor quality (cup and core type). No premium bullets then.
The idea was - shoot soft point first, when buffalo turns to run, shoot solid for maximum penetration in diagonal or Texas heart shot.

Modern school:
Swift a frame has entered the scene! (and other premium ammo, TSX, Woodleigh, Bear claws)

Controlled expansion, and deep penetration.
Shoot them in any situation, broad side, frontal and diagonal, they will penetrate
They will not make exit wound most probably, but will be stopped under skin on opposite side.
I accept modern school theory.

Solids: Risks of exit wound, and complications:
Buffalo is herd animal, and if you get exit wound with solid, you can have a second buffalo wounded.
Having two types of ammo on the belt, pouch or in rifle complicates the things. I like it simple.

Next issue is the rifle to have same point of impact with soft points and solids. Its complicated, and I like it simple. Zero the rifle with a frames, and go hunting. As simple as that.

Below:
Three swift a frames taken from my buffalo on opposite side under the skin of my buffalo.
1750145041300.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Solids are for targets of opportunity, like the T10...or whenever the PH says to load them. ;)

@franzfmdavis - Picture as promised. Not the exact placement of them when I'm wearing it, but you get the idea.
View attachment 692736
@BeeMaa - I really like that Cross Draw knife sheath, looks like you could draw that knife easily ——and quickly if needed
 
I have Murray Custom leather belt ammo holders for .375 and then a canvas culling belt for my double. They will be all loaded with Barnes TSX and just a few solids for the odd occasion. With TSX there is no need for solids on buffalo. That is old news but seems to live on! Shooting solids is why you see so many videos of Buffalo being shot over and over again with little reaction.
 
Solids on buffalo, the old school:
The rationale of this arrangment is from old times, when soft points were of poor quality (cup and core type). No premium bullets then.
The idea was - shoot soft point first, when buffalo turns to run, shoot solid for maximum penetration in diagonal or Texas heart shot.

Modern school:
Swift a frame has entered the scene! (and other premium ammo, TSX, Woodleigh, Bear claws)

Controlled expansion, and deep penetration.
Shoot them in any situation, broad side, frontal and diagonal, they will penetrate
They will not make exit wound most probably, but will be stopped under skin on opposite side.
I accept modern school theory.

Solids: Risks of exit wound, and complications:
Buffalo is herd animal, and if you get exit wound with solid, you can have a second buffalo wounded.
Having two types of ammo on the belt, pouch or in rifle complicates the things. I like it simple.

Next issue is the rifle to have same point of impact with soft points and solids. Its complicated, and I like it simple. Zero the rifle with a frames, and go hunting. As simple as that.

Below:
Three swift a frames taken from my buffalo on opposite side under the skin of my buffalo.
View attachment 693124
Good explanation.
 
I was going to give Dick a call and see if he does a left-handed belt that would be the mirror image of yours. That way I could put the buckle in the back.
He will make anything you want.
 
I carry all TSX bullets. They work.
If I were to hunt ele's, then I would carry whatever the PH told me to carry.
I have not been a fan of mixed bullet types.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
61,544
Messages
1,347,826
Members
116,027
Latest member
JefferyZeM
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

Salahuddin wrote on STEAR's profile.
Thank you.
ghay wrote on DobeGrant45c's profile.
Hi Ethan,
Just checking to see if you know when you will be shipping yet?
Thanks,
Gary
2RECON wrote on Riflecrank's profile.
Hallo Ron, do you remember me? I´m Michael from Germany. We did some Wildcats on the .338 Lapua Case.
.375 i did, and a .500 and .510 you did.
Can you please contact me again (eMail please)

Best
Michael
 
Top