So.... Practice? Practice rifles? Practice calibers?
My personal experience is that there are different practice rifles, and different practice calibers, for different practices, and that most of us need to practice it all, and a lot, and often...
Some think that practice is useless, and to each our own, but it reminds me of the classic "one does not know what one does not know", and I am tempted to suggest the interview of target or trap champions to ask whether they think practice is valuable or not..... 'nough said
I personally see several practices required, and several tools to do so. Without writing a thesis on each aspect of these practices (there is plenty of material easily available from peer-reviewed sources), let's mention in a particular order:
Body control, rifle control, respiration control, heartbeat control, trigger control, etc. in so many words: fundamental shooting form. Until the rifle is immobile when the shot goes, accuracy will always be elusive. This is where a quality .22 LR rifle is invaluable because it takes thousands of rounds to master proper
shooting form, and quality .22 LR ammo is king. Notice that I said "quality" because when the round does not go where it was supposed to, quality .22 ammo offers no excuse. Forget 4 MOA Thunderbolt, shoot at least 2 MOA ammo. You do not need to shoot expensive 1/4 MOA Eley Tenex, there is a middle road, I am personally comfortable that when I miss the 2" plate at 100 yards standing-off-the-sticks, with relatively affordable 1 MOA Eley Club, it is me at fault, not the ammo.
PS:
dry-fire at home is extremely valuable, but it does not provide evidentiary feedback. Nothing like a .22 hole 1" off the bull on the paper, or nothing like a plate that does not ring, to affirm the obvious: I missed. Dry firing does not do that.
Sticks practice. Much has already been said, all good. Start with a 6" steel plate at 100 yards. One is always amazed how many folks do not ring a 6" plate, 5 shots out of 5, at 100 yards,
standing-off-the-sticks (from the bench does not count, there are no benches in the bush). That is 6 MOA shooting... Easy, right? Try 5 series of 5 shots, any miss resets the count
View attachment 654672
Minimum practical safari training: 6" plate at 100 yards with good .22 LR rifle, decent glass, quality ammo, and tripod sticks.
When you get to 100% consistently on the 6" plate, and you will, switch to 5", 4" and 3" plates, and ultimately 2".
Practice on tripod sticks will make you a 3 MOA standing-off-the-sticks shooter.
Practice on quadpod sticks will make you a 2 MOA standing-off-the-sticks shooter.
This is also where we go back to the above about quality .22 LR.
View attachment 654675
5", 4" and 3" plates at 100 yards for .22 LR practice. Going smaller and smaller always delivers newly relearned lessons: in this case the groups are smaller as the plate size diminishes, illustrating glaringly "aim small, miss small".
PS:
shooting sub MOA from the bench is irrelevant, most of the shots in Africa are taken standing, and boy oh boy does that make a difference
Distance practice. Yes, technically a 6" plate at 300 yards is a 2 MOA shot, therefore the same shooting skills as a 2" plate at 100 yards. But somehow it is not quite the same, and one does not replace the other. Is your range-finder accurate? Do you know your ammo drop? Is your scope good enough? All those questions, you will not answer at 100 yards with a .22 LR.
This is where a still affordable, but yet easy and accurate round is invaluable. Here the .223 is king, and once more, forget American Eagle 5 MOA 55 gr bulk .223, it will not help you much. Again you do not need 1/2 MOA Federal Gold Match and there are plenty a good 1 MOA .223 ammo out there. I am having good luck with affordable Hornady Frontier 55 gr HP Match.
View attachment 654673
A quality .223 rifle, 6" plate, laser range-finder, good quality scope with BDC turret, and good quality ammo will practice you out to 300 yards, and will teach you how precarious hold-over techniques are on a 6" target.
Recoil practice. There are no two ways about it, DG cartridges recoil
control must be learned and can only be learned from a heavy recoil rifle.
BEWARE: learning recoil control does not mean getting used to uncontrolled recoil, and once you know how to do it, you do not need to batter yourself into pulp shooting thousands of rounds. A handful of shots at the end of practice sessions in the last month before the safari will do IF you have learned the technique.
View attachment 654676
There are no two ways about it: to learn how to shoot your cannon (here a .458 Lott), you will need to fire it. BUT ONLY AFTER you learn proper shooting form; shooting standing-off-the-sticks; and recoil control techniques.
Bad practice. This brings one of the problems with individual practice. As previously mentioned "one does not know what one does not know" and practicing bad shooting form, improper sticks position, poor recoil control, etc. is counterproductive.
Allow me the use of upper cases, I am not yelling, just making the point clear: IF YOU HAVE NOT RECEIVED
FORMAL SHOOTING TRAINING, YOU MUST
TAKE THE TIME TO LEARN THE FUNDAMENTALS. Just because you have shot game effectively does not mean you know how to shoot.
The problem is that not all those who volunteer to teach are qualified to do so, be it on the internet, at the local range, or amongst friends, because none of these are peer reviewed..................
But there are good resources out there, easily available in print or video, and sometimes face to face. Just be selective on who does the teaching.
View attachment 654677
Not every internet blogger, next-table shooter at the range, gun shop clerk, or even friend or parent, is necessarily qualified to teach proper shooting form, shooting standing-off-the-sticks, recoil control techniques, etc. Beware internet "experts" and rely on peer-reviewing...
Good enough tool. Like many I started with a decent man-size .22 LR (in my case, 3 actually, a modern iteration of the Winchester 52 made by Miroku, a Walther KKJ, and an Anschutz 1418) with decent glass (Zeiss Conquest) and I lived with the less than ideal different trigger, different stock, different ergonomics, etc. And I even saved money by shooting Thunderbolt bulk ammo.
It got me to 6 MOA standing-off-the-sticks, then down to 4 MOA, which means a
predictable / repeatable hit on a 8" target (i.e. the size of the vital area of most medium plains game) out to 200 yards.
I will be categorical: it is not ideal, but it is good enough. As long as the rifle is bolt action, man-size, and holds 2 MOA with decent ammo, it will do the job, and you could do a lot worse than a CZ 452.
The same reasoning applies to a .223.
View attachment 654679
View attachment 654680
View attachment 654681
Winchester 52, Walther KKJ, and Anschutz 1418 all keep the Thunderbolt bulk ammo in 4 " at 100 yards (4 MOA). Good enough to ring the 6" plate, but you will need better ammo to become a 2 MOA shooter standing-off-the-sticks, and ideally you would want to shoot the "same" rifle as the one you will be hunting with.
Ideal tool. It is all a matter of money and how you spend it. Ideal practice tool but cannot afford a safari anymore? Wrong calculus! But if you can afford it there is no arguing that shooting the "same" rifle in practice and in actual hunting is best. My own solution is the Blaser R8 with both .22 and .223 training barrels, and .257 Wby, .300 Wby, .375 H&H and .458 Lott barrels.
If you ask me, yes, I think the ideal tool makes a difference. No later than yesterday, I unbolted the .22 LR barrel with which I shoot a couple dozen rounds a every weeks at 2" plates at 100 yards in my backyard, bolted the .300 Wby, drove 15 minutes to a friend's ranch, and fired standing-off-the-sticks 5 shots at 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 yards on 4", 5", 6", 8" and 10" plates respectively. These are 4, 2.5, 2, 2, and 2 MOA shots. The plates rang 5 times.
View attachment 654678
Blaser R8: practicing with the same rifle you hunt with, from .22 LR and .223 to .458 Lott, through .257 Wby, .300 Wby and .375 H&H: priceless.
Even though, like
Red Leg I competed for years, and won medals, in Three Position .22 LR 50 meters; I went through regimental sniper training; and I hunted very successfully the French Alps for decades,
I promise you (as they are fond of saying n South Africa) that I was utterly incapable of hitting the 6" plate at 100 yards standing-off-the-sticks consistently 5 times in a row before or during my first safari. No we did not loose any game, but I was not very proud of my shooting, and it took a few more rounds than it should have.
Why do we insist on shooting standing-off-the-sticks? Because it is "99%" (as a way of talking) of your shooting in Africa and like everything it needs to be learned. And I can also tell you that if I do not practice for a couple months, I better bring the 6", 8" and 10" plates at 100, 200, and 300 yards for 6, 4 and 3 MOA shots...