I had the pleasure of living and hunting in Germany for five years and have hunted there, Austria, and Spain a bit since. Our hunting traditions come from two very different traditions. European traditions trace their roots to the notions of high game restricted to the nobility; of all game belonging to the land owner; and of a tenant farming and labor class available to serve the local Lord as beaters for the early elaborate driven hunts, and the smaller, but still very regimented hunts one finds throughout Northern and Central Europe today. Obviously, the hunters are no longer strictly blooded aristocracy, but they do tend to represent the wealthier classes. No longer bound to the land per se, the beaters are modern, local working class folks who participate in the drive as beaters for a stipend and also for the fun of it. On one drive hunt in which I participated many years ago, the beaters were veterinary classmates of the Revier (Lease) owner's son. A unique, I am sure, event for a number of urban young people from the Munich area - particularly when a sounder of wild boar broke through the beater line!
The formative traditions in North America were quite different in spite of so many colonists arriving from Europe - or perhaps, in part, because of it. For the better part of two-hundred years, hunting had little to do with sport and everything to do with survival. Everyone on the advancing frontier participated - there were no fences and no game keepers. Game animals were part of the environment; not someone's property. All that began to change in the mid-19th century as the frontier gradually disappeared and fences began to go up. Hunting for the larder remained important but often not absolutely necessary; giving greater importance to the "sporting" aspects of the chase. Regrettably, it was during this period that market hunting blossomed, decimating or worse game stocks across the continent. Fortunately, with enlightened national political leadership by people such as Theodore Roosevelt and hundreds of concerned hunters on the local level, game laws were gradually put in place and most species began to recover.
Still, the notion of game belonging to people had been firmly planted in the North American soul. Huge tracts, largely game-managed by the individual states or provinces were set aside for public hunting access. In most areas, up until thirty or forty years ago, many private land owners readily granted access to hunters following a polite knock at the door. That is, unfortunately, changing at a blistering pace, particularly in the US. On the one side, urban liberals, who have never seen a national wildlife refuge or federally designated wilderness area, push to limit public access in general and hunting specifically in those areas. At the same time, private land owners have learned the value of the game on their property, particularly whitetail deer, and the lease system has spread all through their range. The same thing has occurred in coastal areas with respect to wildfowl.
However, the notion of hunting being the "right" of everyone is still quite strong. Which is a very long way around to explaining why we do not do driven hunts with beaters in this country. Pheasants are often "driven" in the Midwest. But there the dozen or so guns are divided between "blockers" and those pushing the field. All are armed and part of the hunt. Deer are still sometimes driven - particularly in the Northeast, but again these are small drives conducted by hunters - not beaters. In the South deer were driven by dogs. Finally, the class of country folks who would typically make up the beaters on a European drive hunt, are likely to be the most ardent hunters in a corresponding region of North America. I suspect that is changing at an ever accelerating pace as every bit of huntable ground is leased, but even in those cases, most of the lease holders are firmly working and middle class hunters.
One also sees that in the firearms that the typical North American hunter takes to the field. Quail hunting is one of the few areas where SxS's and OU's never gave way to pumps and semi-automatic shotguns. On a plantation in Georgia one could have seen fine, expensive "bird" guns at anytime over the last century. But until very recently, most hunters grew up a pump - mine was a Ted Williams built by Winchester and marketed by Sears. I have a little 20-bore model twelve that will still roll a dove cleaner than any fine English gun on the rack. That is another thing that is changing as opportunity has gradually lessened, and I suspect most North American hunters go afield with an OU of some form today (with the exception of waterfowl hunting).
Didn't mean for this to turn into a term paper, but our respective heritages often have European and North American hunters not fully understanding each other.