Actually it more closely resembles a modern sidelock, but with the added feature of manual locks. In other words, I can have the gun loaded, cocked, and on safe approaching a covey of birds and it is in exactly the same firing condition as the Holland & Holland Royal my hunting partner is carrying. It is just that you can see the hammers of this gun while the Royal's are hidden by the side plates.
Picking this back up
@Red Leg :
I'm trying to figure the operations on such a modern hammer rifle:
- When the gun is loaded, hammers uncocked. In what position would the safety have to be, or it does not matter?
- in this position, irrespective if the safety is on or off, can you cock the hammer(s) anyway?
- Would the following series of operations be possible:
1. you get out of the truck, pluck two rounds from your belt, break the gun, and close the action. I suppose that the rifle now has the hammers cocked and safety off.
2. you carefully uncock the hammers one by one (by I suppose holding the hammer with the thumb and pulling the trigger?) As asked above, I do not know if the safety is supposed to be on or off by this stage?
3. You start the track for a few miles, with a loaded, but uncocked rifle (unknown safety). Once you get to the final yards where the magic happens, you pull back the hammers (one by one I suppose) and put the safety slide on (if not already the case).
4. Quarry is observed, safety is un-engaged and shots are fired.
5. As the (buffalo) is not feeling very cooperative today, more rounds are needed. So the double hammer gun is broken open, (I suppose automatic ejectors), two more rounds are dropped in, action is closed, hammers are cocked automatically by the closing of the action and the safety remains off (non-automatic safety) and two more rounds sail through the air, hopefully reaching their intended target.
I'm basically trying to figure out if a modern hammer double rifle would be a good alternative in its operations, compared to a Blaser S2, Krieghoff, Merkel, etc. Biggest disadvantage I see is that the cocking happens one by one. The advantages would be, a nicer looking rifle along the line of the British guns would be a possibility , where more attention to balance and handling can be applied than is the case for the aforementioned continental style double rifles. Also an added safety bonus is that everyone can see from afar if you are cocked or not. And for those with problems pushing the cockor forward on a Krieghoff/Blaser, the fact of cocking one by one, should halve the force necessary. As well as having more leverage I suppose.
Last thing, how silent is the cocking of the hammers on your example?
Thanks a lot!
Cheers,
V.