Here’s a slo-mo of me shooting a 570 grain TSX out of a Krieghoff Classic Big Five .500 NE. Keep your eye on my right shoulder for the push.
Last edited:
Some of the example numbers did come from the CH tables. But, there is a formula for figuring the recoil energy of any specific rifle. As you state, the weight of the rifle is a very important variable as is the weight of the bullet. Just adding the weight of a scope to a rifle will improve the felt recoil. Still many of the largest DG caliber rifles are deployed with only iron sights or a red dot for both aesthetics and to prevent getting scoped in the eye. The 458WM I was shooting is a CZ550 Safari and weigh just over 9lbs with irons only. I found it fairly tolerable. With irons it shot very well. One of our guys shot it for the first time and hit a std IPSC plate at 400y on the 1st shot (luck?). I tried a couple of times but aimed too high and shot over it and forgot that the rifle had folding leaf sights for longer shots and a set trigger. Nice rifle. I liked it a lot more than I thought I would.Did you take those recoil numbers from the Chuck Hawkes recoil table?
Rifle weight is an important factor here as the rifle you own may not line up with the weight used in the calculation in the table.
I personally own 375HH (9.6lb rifle), 416 Rigby (11.5lb rifle), 458 WM (8.6lb rifle) and a 470 NE (12.5lb rifle).
I really don’t know what Sako was thinking with those rifles. 9lbs would have been find for 375HH, but for 416 Rigby, 450 Rigby and 500 Jeffery they should have been 10-12lbs.A 416 Rigby in a Sako Brown bear was the WORST recoil I have ever felt. It absolutely rattled my chiclets.
I turned around and shot 2 double rifles in 470 Nitro, and a CZ 550 in 500 Mbogo without issues. I did not care for the Mbogo because of how long the recoil recovery was. The rifle weighed 9.25lbs and was loaded to 500 NE specs. I think 11lbs would have made it just about right.
You know, my 416 Rem Model 70 is 9lb naked, and it is still nowhere close to that rough. I think there must be something to the stock geometry that does not fit with me.I really don’t know what Sako was thinking with those rifles. 9lbs would have been find for 375HH, but for 416 Rigby, 450 Rigby and 500 Jeffery they should have been 10-12lbs.
If we're talking 416 RemMag V Rigby, the differential in case capacity and powder charge could be making all the difference in the same 9 lb rifle.You know, my 416 Rem Model 70 is 9lb naked, and it is still nowhere close to that rough. I think there must be something to the stock geometry that does not fit with me.
Thanks for sharing the calculator!If we're talking 416 RemMag V Rigby, the differential in case capacity and powder charge could be making all the difference in the same 9 lb rifle.
416 RemMag uses about 20% less powder for the same ballistics.
These are the numbers I get when running the numbers through this calculator.
1. 416 Rigby - 75.12 ft-lbs in a 9 lb rifle with 100 gr of powder.
2. 416 RemMag - 65.18 ft-lbs in a 9lb rifle with 80 gr of powder.
I always like to hear accounts like this, especially since the 350gr 458 bullet would have what many would consider to be an sub-par Sectional Density of 0.238.My hunting buddy loads his 458 win mag with 350 grain Barnes TSX bullets, he took a cape buffalo with one shot. The recoil with that load is very tolerable.