Any programs out there for designing cartridges?

Thanks for all the info!

@michael458 I was thinking of going with belted cases for both cartridges to avoid head spacing issues. I have a decent stock pile of 585 HE brass and cutting some of these down would be an inexpensive solution.

For the 50 caliber cartridge I would like to stick with a .510" bullet, mainly because of a large stock pile of .510" bullets (hundreds of A-frames!). Not sure what I'd use as a parent case... more research to be done.
 
Back to the original enquiry, CoW, 15th Ed lists three "wildcats" that might qualify: .500 Cyrus (using .500" bullets) and the .50 TAC, using .510 projectiles; both developed by Michael Cyrus of Cross Outdoors. They use minimal taper 450 Rigby cases, shortened, but with the rim turned down to .531". The latter most likely needs a "long" action.
The third option is called the .500 Belted Magnum; a shortened 460 Weatherby case (2.500") with an OAL of 3.25". Built on a P14 action.
I've debated such a build myself ...
As suggested, Michael458's 500B&M would be awesome !!!
 
I was actually just talking to a friend about shortening the 460 WBY case. Figured it would still be too wide for most actions.
 
As @michael458 said, I should really explain my goal for the cartridge (will focus on the 50 caliber first). My goal is a cartridge that can use my life-time supply of .510" 570gr bullets in an easily available modern action. As a secondary goal, I'd like a more efficient cartridge than the 500 Jeffery or the 505 Gibbs. I used to own a 505 Gibbs and one of its weak points was its huge case capacity.

-Matt
 
Data for it is around online the Parborg . He also got his own cartridge boxes and brass made for it
What's the bullet diameter? .358?
 
I find it interesting that Ed Hubel mentions eventually chambering a Remington and Savage in his .585HE. It still has the Gibbs .640 diameter bolt face. I don't know if a .532 bolt could be opened up to .640 with the enclosed bolt face on those? One could replace the bolt head on the Savage with a .640 if they made one? Interesting.
 
@PerH while that is a neat cartridge, the bullet diameter is a fair bit smaller than what we are talking about in this thread. :unsure:
 
I find it interesting that Ed Hubel mentions eventually chambering a Remington and Savage in his .585HE. It still has the Gibbs .640 diameter bolt face. I don't know if a .532 bolt could be opened up to .640 with the enclosed bolt face on those? One could replace the bolt head on the Savage with a .640 if they made one? Interesting.
On the 585nyati there are several different bolt faces used, I would try to keep it at least 600. I have a 640 and a 624.
 
@michael458 I was thinking of going with belted cases for both cartridges to avoid head spacing issues.
Lets consider "Head Space" for a few minutes and take into account something most do not consider.
It is the "Extractor" on control feed guns, that actually controls Head Space. Why is head space important, and what function does it serve? Head Space keeps the cartridge from going too far into the chamber for the firing pin to hit the primer, keeping the head of the cartridge in direct contact with the bolt face..... right? Basically.

Now comes this big claw extractor on control feed guns. Does anyone have a lot of experience with 1911 45 ACP handguns? Well, we know that these are control feed guns, the rim of the cartridge slides up under the extractor and controls feeding into the chamber. Now, what is the limiting factor of that cartridge going too far into the chamber? First, you will always hear that the 45 ACP head spaces on the mouth of the cartridge! That is the first answer, but that is not exactly correct. The cartridge cannot possibly go any further into the chamber, "than the extractor will allow it to"............ The rim cannot get past the extractor to go further into the chamber, the extractor holds the cartridge firmly against the bolt face so positive ignition is assured.

A Winchester M70 control feed rifle, with the big claw extractor serves exactly the same purpose, and that is regardless of whether it is belted, shoulder, mouth or other supposed method, it is actually the extractor that controls head space.

I love a 1911 45 ACP, always have. In 2005 when I designed the 50 B&M, a 2.240 inch RUM case, cut/trimmed, I never thought to use anything but a Winchester M70 Control Feed gun. This cartridge would head space off of the extractor, but like the 45 ACP, it could do so on the mouth of the case. Just behind the RUM 50, I designed a 50 B&M Super Short, a 1.65 inch WSM Case, and used a WSSM Win M70 Control feed gun for those, exactly like a Bolt gun version of 500 S&W, only we could hit 65000 PSI in the little bolt guns.

So now, we have a 2.240 inch RUM case and rifle, and we have a 1.65 inch case and rifle, both rimless, and to test the extractor head space, I decided to fire 50 rounds of the Super Short version in the RUM version chamber! Obviously Case Mouth with the 1.65 inch case, could not in any way head space on the mouth of a 2.240 inch chamber! Impossible.

Here you can see comparison between the .500s...........

DSC01628-L.jpg


So, off to the range with Winchester M70 Control feed 50 B&M..2.240 inch RUM case, and a box of 50 rounds of 50 B&M Super Short ammo............. I fired all 50 rounds, every round fired with zero issues.... accuracy at 50 yards was crap because of so much bullet jump, but without any issue at all the 1.65 inch case fired 100% reliably in the 2.240 inch chamber.

This is perhaps to me the most important reason to use nothing but a control feed gun for DG.

So what does actually control head space in a control feed gun...............

Now, I love other types of rifles as well, single shots, semi, levers and what have you. I had a few of those 1885 Winchester Single shots converted to various B&Ms as well, one of those is a 50 B&M. In this rifle the head space absolutely is on the case mouth. As long as I keep my cases trimmed properly, then all is 100%. I also have a Ruger #1 chambered in 50 Super Short, and again, it head spaces on the mouth. The only issue I have ever had with either of these guns is when I get too lazy to trim the cases properly after several firings and loadings, and it grows too long and will not chamber.

I have a big #1 chambered in 500 MDM. That is the big 2.8 inch RUM case. While it has a little ghost shoulder on it, it is a bolt gun cartridge using nothing but the extractor for head space. But I had this #1 and converted it regardless. The 500 MDM is one of the few B&Ms that needs to be crimped. So one day I am playing with the Ruger #1 with some standard 500 MDM ammo I loaded, with crimp! Low and behold, I experienced a few rounds that would not fire in the gun???? Since we needed the mouth to head space on in the Ruger #1, and I had CRIMPED these loads for the Bolt Guns....... well the cartridge slipped too far in the chamber to have reliable head space and be held against the bolt face......... After that, I had to remember loads for the #1 were not crimped.

I mentioned Semi guns, I have a .500 version in a semi, this cartridge is 2 inch RUM case, and yes, it head spaces on the mouth, since the semi is basically a push feed. Never ever an issue, except when I am too lazy to trim and a case gets too long to chamber, other wise zero issues......

Head Space is a very important part of deciding factors concerning the cartridge, I mean, if it won't fire, its a problem. But there are other things to consider beyond just the design of the case. In any control feed gun, it does not make a hill of beans how the cartridge head spaces, because it will always be the "Extractor" that controls that for you.
 
Michael458 is another of those individuals I would love to sit down with over a campfire, discussing cartridge and rifle design; another is Anthony George, of N T Gunsmiths; so much to learn from such men ...
 
A suggestion for you, search the lists of reamers made by various makers; e.g Clymer, Manson, et al; you may find what you're searching for there ...
 
Data for it is around online the Parborg . He also got his own cartridge boxes and brass made for it
Similar to the 9.3 Sisk (Charlie Sisk, of Dayton, TX; bases on the 8mm Rem Mag, necked up) Thumpers, both
 
As @michael458 said, I should really explain my goal for the cartridge (will focus on the 50 caliber first). My goal is a cartridge that can use my life-time supply of .510" 570gr bullets in an easily available modern action. As a secondary goal, I'd like a more efficient cartridge than the 500 Jeffery or the 505 Gibbs. I used to own a 505 Gibbs and one of its weak points was its huge case capacity.

-Matt

Most of my experiences that involve using a supply of components I have on hand. Usually ends in disappointment, I'm more time than not better off selling what I have and build to my needs.

Food for thought.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
57,897
Messages
1,242,458
Members
102,265
Latest member
SilasKeyne
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Grz63 wrote on Werty's profile.
(cont'd)
Rockies museum,
CM Russel museum and lewis and Clark interpretative center
Horseback riding in Summer star ranch
Charlo bison range and Garnet ghost town
Flathead lake, road to the sun and hiking in Glacier NP
and back to SLC (via Ogden and Logan)
Grz63 wrote on Werty's profile.
Good Morning,
I plan to visit MT next Sept.
May I ask you to give me your comments; do I forget something ? are my choices worthy ? Thank you in advance
Philippe (France)

Start in Billings, Then visit little big horn battlefield,
MT grizzly encounter,
a hot springs (do you have good spots ?)
Looking to buy a 375 H&H or .416 Rem Mag if anyone has anything they want to let go of
Erling Søvik wrote on dankykang's profile.
Nice Z, 1975 ?
Tintin wrote on JNevada's profile.
Hi Jay,

Hope you're well.

I'm headed your way in January.

Attending SHOT Show has been a long time bucket list item for me.

Finally made it happen and I'm headed to Vegas.

I know you're some distance from Vegas - but would be keen to catch up if it works out.

Have a good one.

Mark
 
Top