Here are some articles on the .444 that might explain it better, and clear the air a little more.
History, performance, factory and hand load data
www.ballisticstudies.com
I, for one, realize that the .444 Marlin has had a bad reputation from unscrupulous hunters who think that short, 240 gr .44 Mag bullets are the best thing since sliced bread. I can honestly say, that those who use the .44 Mag bullets are destined for heartache and sorrow when it comes to hunting heavier game than the average deer.
Properly hand loaded, with heavier projectiles, and longer projectiles, that increase the SD of the .430 caliber are well suited to my Marlin 1895, with 1 in 20 inch Ballard Rifling. It will handle the longer, heavier bullets, from 300 gr to 400 gr with aplomb.
It will also shoot the same bullet weights in the .45-70 at the same velocities as the .45-70, if not a little faster.
For me, I am an ethical hunter. With saying that, I wouldn’t want my quarry to suffer unnecessarily.
So for me, going after the bigger animals, whether it be here in North America, or Africa, excluding Elephants, I would use the heavy for caliber hardcast 335 gr Bear Tooth gas check bullet, to 350 gr same bullet.
As what was said in The Ballistic Studies, what helps the newer rendition of the .444 Marlin chambering while using said heavyweight bullets, is the hydraulic effect of the speed of the bullet along with the frontal area of the bullet to create a 1.5 inch wound throughout a big animal.
I do know, from seeing my friend who uses his to hunt anything from mice to moose, that when he uses it within its limitations, and he shot a moose broadside, that when the moose was shot, it looked like it was hit on top of the head with a 25 pound sledge hammer. When we gutted the animal, the wound channel was excessive, and the bullet exited on the offside, and made a hole the size of 2 fists side by side. That was my fists, and I have big hands.
But, anyways, I digress.
Does any of this info change anyone else’s mind?
Hawk