Yes, a CZ or Zastava which has been "breathed-on" by a good 'smith seems a good option. Though I do have a thing for FN commericials so maybe speak to M. Dumoulin of Liege...
Hello Scrumbag,
I too am quite fond of the FN Commercial Model 98 Mauser.
If your pitted barrel 9.3x62 is shooting well enough, in spite of the less than perfect bore, I definitely would just keep it as it is.
Also, you mentioned that it was not drilled for scope bases but instead is equipped with Rigby "peep sight".
Likewise, I'd just leave the sights as they are and bring it to Africa like that.
Regarding your avaiable choices for a first dangerous game rifle, if you are only planning to use factory ammunition, I think I would select whichever suitable cartridge is commonly available where you live.
That way you can practice enough to properly prepare for an African adventure.
If you are a hand-loader, then I would probably choose the .404 Jeffery.
This is presuming that live ammunition for it is as difficult to find where you are, as it is here where I am (Alaska).
Once you acquire some brass cartridges, all that is at issue will be projectiles and presumably those are not as heavily regulated there as live ammunition is.
(Mail order the projectiles, then powder and primers from local gun shop?)
I own a .416 Rigby and am generally speaking, very happy with it.
However, admittedly I hand-load it only to Pre-War .404 ballistics, because at full speed, the Rigby cartridge has very "sporting recoil" for a soft shouldered geezer like me.
So, I am burning more powder than I would like (, just to duplicate what the .404 has always done with less.
Therefore, if I had found a .404 rifle at an affordable price, I would have a .404 Jeffery instead of my otherwise excellent .416 Rigby (it is a somewhat Gunsmith modified CZ, Model 550 Magnum).
Last but not least, I also have a .458 Lott that, is likewise based on the large and robust CZ Magnum action.
And it is by all accounts, a very fine caliber for dangerous game (mine surely does kill the living daylights out of paper targets, here at my local rifle range).
As with my .416, I load this one down a bit as well.
Mine weighs about 11 pound, has a 23 inch barrel and dreaded "hog's-back" style walnut stock with Schnabel forend, aka; "Bavarian" style stock, aka: "South Africa Express" style stock, blah, blah, blah, snore.
I have fired it quite a bit with 480 and 500 grain bullet (whichever I happen to get a good price on) at just a tic over 2100 feet per second.
Recoil is stout but not brutal and accuracy is astounding on good days (when I'm not hung over - just kidding ... sort of).
Loaded with 400 grain bullet, the Lott will shoot flat enough so that hitting targets at a bit over 200 meters is not difficult in the slightest.
The cartridge is capable of 2400 fps with 400 grainers from said 23" barrel (but recoil begins to approach the "snappy" category, somewhere around the 2400 fps threshold).
Fact is, with some focused practice, one can learn even the 500 grain 2100 fps trajectory surprisingly well, for hunting antelope and swine, somewhat beyond "dangerous game distances".
Well anyway, at the end of the day, you can't go wrong if you ignore my tedious, rambling rant here and simply just do as Mr. Spike.T suggested.
Cheers,
Velo Dog.